An Active Inference Strategy for Prompting Reliable Responses from Large Language Models in Medical Practice

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21051v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 05:00:18 GMT
• Title: An Active Inference Strategy for Prompting Reliable Responses from Large Language Models in Medical Practice
• Authors: Roma Shusterman, Allison C. Waters, Shannon O`Neill, Phan Luu, Don M. Tucker,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are non-deterministic, may provide incorrect or harmful responses, and cannot be regulated to assure quality control. Our proposed framework refines LLM responses by restricting their primary knowledge base to domain-specific datasets containing validated medical information. We conducted a validation study where expert cognitive behaviour therapy for insomnia therapists evaluated responses from the LLM in a blind format.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Continuing advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) in artificial intelligence offer important capacities in intuitively accessing and using medical knowledge in many contexts, including education and training as well as assessment and treatment. Most of the initial literature on LLMs in medicine has emphasized that LLMs are unsuitable for medical use because they are non-deterministic, may provide incorrect or harmful responses, and cannot be regulated to assure quality control. If these issues could be corrected, optimizing LLM technology could benefit patients and physicians by providing affordable, point-of-care medical knowledge. Our proposed framework refines LLM responses by restricting their primary knowledge base to domain-specific datasets containing validated medical information. Additionally, we introduce an actor-critic LLM prompting protocol based on active inference principles of human cognition, where a Therapist agent initially responds to patient queries, and a Supervisor agent evaluates and adjusts responses to ensure accuracy and reliability. We conducted a validation study where expert cognitive behaviour therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) therapists evaluated responses from the LLM in a blind format. Experienced human CBT-I therapists assessed responses to 100 patient queries, comparing LLM-generated responses with appropriate and inappropriate responses crafted by experienced CBT-I therapists. Results showed that LLM responses received high ratings from the CBT-I therapists, often exceeding those of therapist-generated appropriate responses. This structured approach aims to integrate advanced LLM technology into medical applications, meeting regulatory requirements for establishing the safe and effective use of special purpose validated LLMs in medicine.

Related papers

• Demystifying Large Language Models for Medicine: A Primer [50.83806796466396]
  Large language models (LLMs) represent a transformative class of AI tools capable of revolutionizing various aspects of healthcare. This tutorial aims to equip healthcare professionals with the tools necessary to effectively integrate LLMs into clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T15:41:56Z)
• CBT-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Assisting Cognitive Behavior Therapy [67.23830698947637]
  We propose a new benchmark, CBT-BENCH, for the systematic evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) assistance. We include three levels of tasks in CBT-BENCH: I: Basic CBT knowledge acquisition, with the task of multiple-choice questions; II: Cognitive model understanding, with the tasks of cognitive distortion classification, primary core belief classification, and fine-grained core belief classification; III: Therapeutic response generation, with the task of generating responses to patient speech in CBT therapy sessions. Experimental results indicate that while LLMs perform well in reciting CBT knowledge, they fall short in complex real-world scenarios
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T04:52:57Z)
• PALLM: Evaluating and Enhancing PALLiative Care Conversations with Large Language Models [10.258261180305439]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer a new approach to assessing complex communication metrics. LLMs offer the potential to advance the field through integration into passive sensing and just-in-time intervention systems. This study explores LLMs as evaluators of palliative care communication quality, leveraging their linguistic, in-context learning, and reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T16:39:12Z)
• RuleAlign: Making Large Language Models Better Physicians with Diagnostic Rule Alignment [54.91736546490813]
  We introduce the RuleAlign framework, designed to align Large Language Models with specific diagnostic rules. We develop a medical dialogue dataset comprising rule-based communications between patients and physicians. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T17:44:40Z)
• A Survey on Large Language Models from General Purpose to Medical Applications: Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluations [5.265452667976959]
  This survey systematically summarizes how to train medical LLMs based on open-source general LLMs. It covers (a) how to acquire training corpus and construct customized medical training sets, (b) how to choose an appropriate training paradigm, and (d) existing challenges and promising research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T02:42:20Z)
• Towards Automatic Evaluation for LLMs' Clinical Capabilities: Metric, Data, and Algorithm [15.627870862369784]
  Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing interests to improve clinical efficiency for medical diagnosis. We propose an automatic evaluation paradigm tailored to assess the LLMs' capabilities in delivering clinical services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T06:17:54Z)
• Retrieval Augmented Thought Process for Private Data Handling in Healthcare [53.89406286212502]
  We introduce the Retrieval-Augmented Thought Process (RATP) RATP formulates the thought generation of Large Language Models (LLMs) On a private dataset of electronic medical records, RATP achieves 35% additional accuracy compared to in-context retrieval-augmented generation for the question-answering task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T17:17:50Z)
• LLM on FHIR -- Demystifying Health Records [0.32985979395737786]
  This study developed an app allowing users to interact with their health records using large language models (LLMs) The app effectively translated medical data into patient-friendly language and was able to adapt its responses to different patient profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T17:45:34Z)
• ChiMed-GPT: A Chinese Medical Large Language Model with Full Training Regime and Better Alignment to Human Preferences [51.66185471742271]
  We propose ChiMed-GPT, a benchmark LLM designed explicitly for Chinese medical domain. ChiMed-GPT undergoes a comprehensive training regime with pre-training, SFT, and RLHF. We analyze possible biases through prompting ChiMed-GPT to perform attitude scales regarding discrimination of patients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T12:25:32Z)
• An Automatic Evaluation Framework for Multi-turn Medical Consultations Capabilities of Large Language Models [22.409334091186995]
  Large language models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucinations, leading to overly confident but incorrect judgments. This paper introduces an automated evaluation framework that assesses the practical capabilities of LLMs as virtual doctors during multi-turn consultations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T09:24:48Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.