Can We Trust the Unlabeled Target Data? Towards Backdoor Attack and Defense on Model Adaptation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06030v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:42:10 GMT
• Title: Can We Trust the Unlabeled Target Data? Towards Backdoor Attack and Defense on Model Adaptation
• Authors: Lijun Sheng, Jian Liang, Ran He, Zilei Wang, Tieniu Tan,
• Abstract summary: We explore the potential backdoor attacks on model adaptation launched by well-designed poisoning target data. We propose a plug-and-play method named MixAdapt, combining it with existing adaptation algorithms.
• Score: 120.42853706967188
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Model adaptation tackles the distribution shift problem with a pre-trained model instead of raw data, becoming a popular paradigm due to its great privacy protection. Existing methods always assume adapting to a clean target domain, overlooking the security risks of unlabeled samples. In this paper, we explore the potential backdoor attacks on model adaptation launched by well-designed poisoning target data. Concretely, we provide two backdoor triggers with two poisoning strategies for different prior knowledge owned by attackers. These attacks achieve a high success rate and keep the normal performance on clean samples in the test stage. To defend against backdoor embedding, we propose a plug-and-play method named MixAdapt, combining it with existing adaptation algorithms. Experiments across commonly used benchmarks and adaptation methods demonstrate the effectiveness of MixAdapt. We hope this work will shed light on the safety of learning with unlabeled data.

Related papers

• Backdoor Defense through Self-Supervised and Generative Learning [0.0]
  Training on such data injects a backdoor which causes malicious inference in selected test samples. This paper explores an approach based on generative modelling of per-class distributions in a self-supervised representation space. In both cases, we find that per-class generative models allow to detect poisoned data and cleanse the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T11:40:01Z)
• Wicked Oddities: Selectively Poisoning for Effective Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks [11.390175856652856]
  Clean-label attacks are a more stealthy form of backdoor attacks that can perform the attack without changing the labels of poisoned data. We study different strategies for selectively poisoning a small set of training samples in the target class to boost the attack success rate. Our threat model poses a serious threat in training machine learning models with third-party datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T15:38:21Z)
• SEEP: Training Dynamics Grounds Latent Representation Search for Mitigating Backdoor Poisoning Attacks [53.28390057407576]
  Modern NLP models are often trained on public datasets drawn from diverse sources. Data poisoning attacks can manipulate the model's behavior in ways engineered by the attacker. Several strategies have been proposed to mitigate the risks associated with backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T14:50:09Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• IMBERT: Making BERT Immune to Insertion-based Backdoor Attacks [45.81957796169348]
  Backdoor attacks are an insidious security threat against machine learning models. We introduce IMBERT, which uses either gradients or self-attention scores derived from victim models to self-defend against backdoor attacks. Our empirical studies demonstrate that IMBERT can effectively identify up to 98.5% of inserted triggers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T22:08:57Z)
• AdaptGuard: Defending Against Universal Attacks for Model Adaptation [129.2012687550069]
  We study the vulnerability to universal attacks transferred from the source domain during model adaptation algorithms. We propose a model preprocessing framework, named AdaptGuard, to improve the security of model adaptation algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-19T07:53:31Z)
• Hidden Backdoor Attack against Semantic Segmentation Models [60.0327238844584]
  The emphbackdoor attack intends to embed hidden backdoors in deep neural networks (DNNs) by poisoning training data. We propose a novel attack paradigm, the emphfine-grained attack, where we treat the target label from the object-level instead of the image-level. Experiments show that the proposed methods can successfully attack semantic segmentation models by poisoning only a small proportion of training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-06T05:50:29Z)
• Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attacks [74.88735178536159]
  Data poisoning is the number one concern among threats ranging from model stealing to adversarial attacks. We observe that data poisoning and backdoor attacks are highly sensitive to variations in the testing setup. We apply rigorous tests to determine the extent to which we should fear them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T18:34:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.