Protecting Model Adaptation from Trojans in the Unlabeled Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06030v2
• Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 07:54:35 GMT
• Title: Protecting Model Adaptation from Trojans in the Unlabeled Data
• Authors: Lijun Sheng, Jian Liang, Ran He, Zilei Wang, Tieniu Tan,
• Abstract summary: This paper explores the potential trojan attacks on model adaptation launched by well-designed poisoning target data. We propose a plug-and-play method named DiffAdapt, which can be seamlessly integrated with existing adaptation algorithms.
• Score: 120.42853706967188
• License:
• Abstract: Model adaptation tackles the distribution shift problem with a pre-trained model instead of raw data, which has become a popular paradigm due to its great privacy protection. Existing methods always assume adapting to a clean target domain, overlooking the security risks of unlabeled samples. This paper for the first time explores the potential trojan attacks on model adaptation launched by well-designed poisoning target data. Concretely, we provide two trigger patterns with two poisoning strategies for different prior knowledge owned by attackers. These attacks achieve a high success rate while maintaining the normal performance on clean samples in the test stage. To defend against such backdoor injection, we propose a plug-and-play method named DiffAdapt, which can be seamlessly integrated with existing adaptation algorithms. Experiments across commonly used benchmarks and adaptation methods demonstrate the effectiveness of DiffAdapt. We hope this work will shed light on the safety of transfer learning with unlabeled data.

Related papers

• Backdoor Defense through Self-Supervised and Generative Learning [0.0]
  Training on such data injects a backdoor which causes malicious inference in selected test samples. This paper explores an approach based on generative modelling of per-class distributions in a self-supervised representation space. In both cases, we find that per-class generative models allow to detect poisoned data and cleanse the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T11:40:01Z)
• SEEP: Training Dynamics Grounds Latent Representation Search for Mitigating Backdoor Poisoning Attacks [53.28390057407576]
  Modern NLP models are often trained on public datasets drawn from diverse sources. Data poisoning attacks can manipulate the model's behavior in ways engineered by the attacker. Several strategies have been proposed to mitigate the risks associated with backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T14:50:09Z)
• DataElixir: Purifying Poisoned Dataset to Mitigate Backdoor Attacks via Diffusion Models [12.42597979026873]
  We propose DataElixir, a novel sanitization approach tailored to purify poisoned datasets. We leverage diffusion models to eliminate trigger features and restore benign features, thereby turning the poisoned samples into benign ones. Experiments conducted on 9 popular attacks demonstrates that DataElixir effectively mitigates various complex attacks while exerting minimal impact on benign accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T09:40:38Z)
• Exploring Model Dynamics for Accumulative Poisoning Discovery [62.08553134316483]
  We propose a novel information measure, namely, Memorization Discrepancy, to explore the defense via the model-level information. By implicitly transferring the changes in the data manipulation to that in the model outputs, Memorization Discrepancy can discover the imperceptible poison samples. We thoroughly explore its properties and propose Discrepancy-aware Sample Correction (DSC) to defend against accumulative poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T14:45:24Z)
• IMBERT: Making BERT Immune to Insertion-based Backdoor Attacks [45.81957796169348]
  Backdoor attacks are an insidious security threat against machine learning models. We introduce IMBERT, which uses either gradients or self-attention scores derived from victim models to self-defend against backdoor attacks. Our empirical studies demonstrate that IMBERT can effectively identify up to 98.5% of inserted triggers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T22:08:57Z)
• AdaptGuard: Defending Against Universal Attacks for Model Adaptation [129.2012687550069]
  We study the vulnerability to universal attacks transferred from the source domain during model adaptation algorithms. We propose a model preprocessing framework, named AdaptGuard, to improve the security of model adaptation algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-19T07:53:31Z)
• Versatile Weight Attack via Flipping Limited Bits [68.45224286690932]
  We study a novel attack paradigm, which modifies model parameters in the deployment stage. Considering the effectiveness and stealthiness goals, we provide a general formulation to perform the bit-flip based weight attack. We present two cases of the general formulation with different malicious purposes, i.e., single sample attack (SSA) and triggered samples attack (TSA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T03:24:58Z)
• Be Careful about Poisoned Word Embeddings: Exploring the Vulnerability of the Embedding Layers in NLP Models [27.100909068228813]
  Recent studies have revealed a security threat to natural language processing (NLP) models, called the Backdoor Attack. In this paper, we find that it is possible to hack the model in a data-free way by modifying one single word embedding vector. Experimental results on sentiment analysis and sentence-pair classification tasks show that our method is more efficient and stealthier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-29T12:19:45Z)
• How Robust are Randomized Smoothing based Defenses to Data Poisoning? [66.80663779176979]
  We present a previously unrecognized threat to robust machine learning models that highlights the importance of training-data quality. We propose a novel bilevel optimization-based data poisoning attack that degrades the robustness guarantees of certifiably robust classifiers. Our attack is effective even when the victim trains the models from scratch using state-of-the-art robust training methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-02T15:30:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.