Trustworthy human-centric based Automated Decision-Making Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06161v1
• Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 11:02:57 GMT
• Title: Trustworthy human-centric based Automated Decision-Making Systems
• Authors: Marcelino Cabrera and Carlos Cruz and Pavel Novoa-Hern\'andez and David A. Pelta and Jos\'e Luis Verdegay
• Abstract summary: Automated Decision-Making Systems (ADS) have become pervasive across various fields, activities, and occupations, to enhance performance. This research paper presents a thorough examination of the implications, distinctions, and ethical considerations associated with digitalization, digital transformation, and the utilization of ADS in contemporary society and future contexts.
• Score: 0.7048747239308888
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Automated Decision-Making Systems (ADS) have become pervasive across various fields, activities, and occupations, to enhance performance. However, this widespread adoption introduces potential risks, including the misuse of ADS. Such misuse may manifest when ADS is employed in situations where it is unnecessary or when essential requirements, conditions, and terms are overlooked, leading to unintended consequences. This research paper presents a thorough examination of the implications, distinctions, and ethical considerations associated with digitalization, digital transformation, and the utilization of ADS in contemporary society and future contexts. Emphasis is placed on the imperative need for regulation, transparency, and ethical conduct in the deployment of ADS.

Related papers

• Bridging Prediction and Intervention Problems in Social Systems [71.41519966787386]
  We consider the ways in which we must shift from a prediction-focused paradigm to an interventionist paradigm when considering the impact of automated decision systems (ADS)<n>We argue this requires a new default problem setup for ADS beyond prediction, to instead consider predictions as decision support, final decisions, and outcomes.<n>We highlight how this perspective unifies modern statistical frameworks and other tools to study the design, implementation, and evaluation of ADS systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T17:29:13Z)
• Moral Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems [11.716255501861388]
  Testing Autonomous Driving System (ADS) morality is nearly impossible due to the absence of universal moral principles.<n>This paper first extracts a set of moral meta-principles derived from existing moral experiments and well-established social science theories, aiming to capture widely recognized and common-sense moral values for ADSs.<n>We propose a metamorphic testing framework to systematically identify potential moral issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T16:29:58Z)
• A Systematic Literature Review on Safety of the Intended Functionality for Automated Driving Systems [0.0]
  Automated driving depends on sensing both the external and internal environments of a vehicle. ISO 21448 is the standard for Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF) that aims to ensure that the ADS operate safely within their intended functionality. The challenge lies in ensuring the safety of vehicles despite the limited availability of extensive and systematic literature on SOTIF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T11:04:36Z)
• Human Decision-making is Susceptible to AI-driven Manipulation [87.24007555151452]
  AI systems may exploit users' cognitive biases and emotional vulnerabilities to steer them toward harmful outcomes. This study examined human susceptibility to such manipulation in financial and emotional decision-making contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T15:56:22Z)
• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• How Could Generative AI Support Compliance with the EU AI Act? A Review for Safe Automated Driving Perception [4.075971633195745]
  Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have become central for the perception functions of autonomous vehicles. The European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act aims to address these challenges by establishing stringent norms and standards for AI systems. This review paper summarizes the requirements arising from the EU AI Act regarding DNN-based perception systems and systematically categorizes existing generative AI applications in AD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T12:01:06Z)
• Legitimate Power, Illegitimate Automation: The problem of ignoring legitimacy in automated decision systems [0.0]
  Machine learning and artificial intelligence have spurred the widespread adoption of automated decision systems (ADS) This paper shows that theorists often incorrectly conflate legitimacy with either public acceptance or other substantive values such as fairness, accuracy, expertise or efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T06:29:54Z)
• Online Decision Mediation [72.80902932543474]
  Consider learning a decision support assistant to serve as an intermediary between (oracle) expert behavior and (imperfect) human behavior. In clinical diagnosis, fully-autonomous machine behavior is often beyond ethical affordances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T05:59:43Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• Appropriate Fairness Perceptions? On the Effectiveness of Explanations in Enabling People to Assess the Fairness of Automated Decision Systems [0.0]
  We argue that for an effective explanation, perceptions of fairness should increase if and only if the underlying ADS is fair. In this in-progress work, we introduce the desideratum of appropriate fairness perceptions, propose a novel study design for evaluating it, and outline next steps towards a comprehensive experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-14T09:39:59Z)
• Overcoming Failures of Imagination in AI Infused System Development and Deployment [71.9309995623067]
  NeurIPS 2020 requested that research paper submissions include impact statements on "potential nefarious uses and the consequences of failure" We argue that frameworks of harms must be context-aware and consider a wider range of potential stakeholders, system affordances, as well as viable proxies for assessing harms in the widest sense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-26T18:09:52Z)
• A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospects [24.615500469071183]
  We focus on algorithmic recourse, which is concerned with providing explanations and recommendations to individuals who are unfavourably treated by automated decision-making systems. We perform an extensive literature review, and align the efforts of many authors by presenting unified definitions, formulations, and solutions to recourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T15:15:34Z)
• Towards robust sensing for Autonomous Vehicles: An adversarial perspective [82.83630604517249]
  It is of primary importance that the resulting decisions are robust to perturbations. Adversarial perturbations are purposefully crafted alterations of the environment or of the sensory measurements. A careful evaluation of the vulnerabilities of their sensing system(s) is necessary in order to build and deploy safer systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T05:25:15Z)
• The Visual Social Distancing Problem [99.69094590087408]
  We introduce the Visual Social Distancing problem, defined as the automatic estimation of the inter-personal distance from an image. We discuss how VSD relates with previous literature in Social Signal Processing and indicate which existing Computer Vision methods can be used to manage such problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-11T00:04:34Z)
• The Risk to Population Health Equity Posed by Automated Decision Systems: A Narrative Review [0.0]
  Automated decisions being made have significant consequences for individual and population health. Reports of issues arising from their use in health are already appearing. There is a significant risk that use of automated decision systems in health will exacerbate existing population health inequities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-18T06:52:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.