Prompting open-source and commercial language models for grammatical error correction of English learner text

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07702v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:19:47 GMT
• Title: Prompting open-source and commercial language models for grammatical error correction of English learner text
• Authors: Christopher Davis, Andrew Caines, {\O}istein Andersen, Shiva Taslimipoor, Helen Yannakoudakis, Zheng Yuan, Christopher Bryant, Marek Rei, Paula Buttery
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) can be prompt to produce texts which are fluent and grammatical. We evaluate how well LLMs can perform at grammatical error correction (GEC) by measuring their performance on established benchmark datasets. We find that several open-source models outperform commercial ones on minimal edit benchmarks, and that in some settings zero-shot prompting is just as competitive as few-shot prompting.
• Score: 19.192210777082053
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Thanks to recent advances in generative AI, we are able to prompt large language models (LLMs) to produce texts which are fluent and grammatical. In addition, it has been shown that we can elicit attempts at grammatical error correction (GEC) from LLMs when prompted with ungrammatical input sentences. We evaluate how well LLMs can perform at GEC by measuring their performance on established benchmark datasets. We go beyond previous studies, which only examined GPT* models on a selection of English GEC datasets, by evaluating seven open-source and three commercial LLMs on four established GEC benchmarks. We investigate model performance and report results against individual error types. Our results indicate that LLMs do not always outperform supervised English GEC models except in specific contexts -- namely commercial LLMs on benchmarks annotated with fluency corrections as opposed to minimal edits. We find that several open-source models outperform commercial ones on minimal edit benchmarks, and that in some settings zero-shot prompting is just as competitive as few-shot prompting.

Related papers

• Think Carefully and Check Again! Meta-Generation Unlocking LLMs for Low-Resource Cross-Lingual Summarization [108.6908427615402]
  Cross-lingual summarization ( CLS) aims to generate a summary for the source text in a different target language. Currently, instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) excel at various English tasks. Recent studies have shown that LLMs' performance on CLS tasks remains unsatisfactory even with few-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T00:39:44Z)
• Ungrammatical-syntax-based In-context Example Selection for Grammatical Error Correction [8.655807096424732]
  In this paper, we propose a novel ungrammatical-syntax-based in-context example selection strategy for grammatical error correction. Specifically, we measure similarity of sentences based on their syntactic structures with diverse algorithms, and identify optimal ICL examples sharing the most similar ill-formed syntax to the test input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T10:05:57Z)
• Native Language Identification with Large Language Models [60.80452362519818]
  We show that GPT models are proficient at NLI classification, with GPT-4 setting a new performance record of 91.7% on the benchmark11 test set in a zero-shot setting. We also show that unlike previous fully-supervised settings, LLMs can perform NLI without being limited to a set of known classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T00:52:15Z)
• LLM-augmented Preference Learning from Natural Language [19.700169351688768]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are equipped to deal with larger context lengths. LLMs can consistently outperform the SotA when the target text is large. Few-shot learning yields better performance than zero-shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T17:17:27Z)
• An Examination of the Compositionality of Large Generative Vision-Language Models [7.639748270719836]
  Generative Vision-Language Models (GVLMs) have been constructed via multimodal instruction tuning. In this paper, we examine both the evaluation metrics (VisualGPTScore, etc.) and current benchmarks for evaluating the compositionality of GVLMs. We identify the syntactical bias in current benchmarks, which is exploited by the linguistic capability of GVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T06:50:29Z)
• Evaluating the Capability of Large-scale Language Models on Chinese Grammatical Error Correction Task [10.597024796304016]
  Large-scale language models (LLMs) has shown remarkable capability in various of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. This report explores the how large language models perform on Chinese grammatical error correction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-08T13:10:59Z)
• Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars. We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English. Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
• Are Pre-trained Language Models Useful for Model Ensemble in Chinese Grammatical Error Correction? [10.302225525539003]
  We explore several ensemble strategies based on strong PLMs with four sophisticated single models. The performance does not improve but even gets worse after the PLM-based ensemble.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T14:18:52Z)
• A Unified Strategy for Multilingual Grammatical Error Correction with Pre-trained Cross-Lingual Language Model [100.67378875773495]
  We propose a generic and language-independent strategy for multilingual Grammatical Error Correction. Our approach creates diverse parallel GEC data without any language-specific operations. It achieves the state-of-the-art results on the NLPCC 2018 Task 2 dataset (Chinese) and obtains competitive performance on Falko-Merlin (German) and RULEC-GEC (Russian)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T02:10:32Z)
• LM-Critic: Language Models for Unsupervised Grammatical Error Correction [128.9174409251852]
  We show how to leverage a pretrained language model (LM) in defining an LM-Critic, which judges a sentence to be grammatical. We apply this LM-Critic and BIFI along with a large set of unlabeled sentences to bootstrap realistic ungrammatical / grammatical pairs for training a corrector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-14T17:06:43Z)
• Encoder-Decoder Models Can Benefit from Pre-trained Masked Language Models in Grammatical Error Correction [54.569707226277735]
  Previous methods have potential drawbacks when applied to an EncDec model. Our proposed method fine-tune a corpus and then use the output fine-tuned as additional features in the GEC model. The best-performing model state-of-the-art performances on the BEA 2019 and CoNLL-2014 benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-03T04:49:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.