CURLS: Causal Rule Learning for Subgroups with Significant Treatment Effect

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01004v1
• Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 06:36:27 GMT
• Title: CURLS: Causal Rule Learning for Subgroups with Significant Treatment Effect
• Authors: Jiehui Zhou, Linxiao Yang, Xingyu Liu, Xinyue Gu, Liang Sun, Wei Chen,
• Abstract summary: In causal inference, estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) is critical for identifying how different subgroups respond to interventions. We propose CURLS, a novel rule learning method leveraging HTE, which can effectively describe subgroups with significant treatment effects.
• Score: 22.012322558109574
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In causal inference, estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) is critical for identifying how different subgroups respond to interventions, with broad applications in fields such as precision medicine and personalized advertising. Although HTE estimation methods aim to improve accuracy, how to provide explicit subgroup descriptions remains unclear, hindering data interpretation and strategic intervention management. In this paper, we propose CURLS, a novel rule learning method leveraging HTE, which can effectively describe subgroups with significant treatment effects. Specifically, we frame causal rule learning as a discrete optimization problem, finely balancing treatment effect with variance and considering the rule interpretability. We design an iterative procedure based on the minorize-maximization algorithm and solve a submodular lower bound as an approximation for the original. Quantitative experiments and qualitative case studies verify that compared with state-of-the-art methods, CURLS can find subgroups where the estimated and true effects are 16.1% and 13.8% higher and the variance is 12.0% smaller, while maintaining similar or better estimation accuracy and rule interpretability. Code is available at https://osf.io/zwp2k/.

Related papers

• Hierarchical and Density-based Causal Clustering [6.082022112101251]
  We propose plug-in estimators that are simple and readily implementable using off-the-shelf algorithms. We go on to study their rate of convergence, and show that the additional cost of causal clustering is essentially the estimation error of the outcome regression functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T14:01:04Z)
• Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Data [102.16105233826917]
  Learning from preference labels plays a crucial role in fine-tuning large language models. There are several distinct approaches for preference fine-tuning, including supervised learning, on-policy reinforcement learning (RL), and contrastive learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T17:20:18Z)
• Less is More: Fewer Interpretable Region via Submodular Subset Selection [54.07758302264416]
  This paper re-models the above image attribution problem as a submodular subset selection problem. We construct a novel submodular function to discover more accurate small interpretation regions. For correctly predicted samples, the proposed method improves the Deletion and Insertion scores with an average of 4.9% and 2.5% gain relative to HSIC-Attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T13:30:02Z)
• Causal Machine Learning for Moderation Effects [0.0]
  We propose a new parameter, the balanced group average treatment effect (BGATE) By taking the difference of two BGATEs, we can analyse heterogeneity more meaningfully than by comparing two GATEs. Adding additional identifying assumptions allows specific balanced differences in treatment effects between groups to be interpreted causally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T11:34:59Z)
• Statistical Performance Guarantee for Subgroup Identification with Generic Machine Learning [1.0878040851638]
  We develop uniform confidence bands for estimation of the group average treatment effect sorted by generic ML algorithm (GATES) We analyze a clinical trial of late-stage prostate cancer and find a relatively large proportion of exceptional responders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T01:41:47Z)
• Compound Batch Normalization for Long-tailed Image Classification [77.42829178064807]
  We propose a compound batch normalization method based on a Gaussian mixture. It can model the feature space more comprehensively and reduce the dominance of head classes. The proposed method outperforms existing methods on long-tailed image classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-02T07:31:39Z)
• Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects [62.44901952244514]
  The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is the best point prediction of individual causal effects. In aggregate analyses, this is usually addressed by measuring distributional treatment effect (DTE) We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a wide class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z)
• Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
  Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z)
• Robust Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Uncertainty Quantification [84.53697297858146]
  Subgroup analysis of treatment effects plays an important role in applications from medicine to public policy to recommender systems. Most of the current methods of subgroup analysis begin with a particular algorithm for estimating individualized treatment effects (ITE) This paper develops a new method for subgroup analysis, R2P, that addresses all these weaknesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T14:50:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.