Augmenting Math Word Problems via Iterative Question Composing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.09003v5
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 06:13:03 GMT
- Title: Augmenting Math Word Problems via Iterative Question Composing
- Authors: Haoxiong Liu, Yifan Zhang, Yifan Luo, Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,
- Abstract summary: We introduce the MMIQC dataset, comprising a mixture of processed web data and synthetic question-response pairs.<n>Qwen-72B-MMIQC achieves a 45.0% accuracy, exceeding the previous open-source state-of-the-art by 8.2% and outperforming the initial version GPT-4 released in 2023.
- Score: 7.493665644128088
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Despite the advancements in large language models (LLMs) for mathematical reasoning, solving competition-level math problems remains a significant challenge, especially for open-source LLMs without external tools. We introduce the MMIQC dataset, comprising a mixture of processed web data and synthetic question-response pairs, aimed at enhancing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of base language models. Models fine-tuned on MMIQC consistently surpass their counterparts in performance on the MATH benchmark across various model sizes. Notably, Qwen-72B-MMIQC achieves a 45.0% accuracy, exceeding the previous open-source state-of-the-art by 8.2% and outperforming the initial version GPT-4 released in 2023. Extensive evaluation results on Hungarian high school finals suggest that such improvement can generalize to unseen data. Our ablation study on MMIQC reveals that a large part of the improvement can be attributed to our novel augmentation method, Iterative Question Composing (IQC), which involves iteratively composing new questions from seed problems using an LLM and applying rejection sampling through another LLM.
Related papers
- Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Models [86.45058529521258]
OlymMATH is a novel Olympiad-level mathematical benchmark designed to rigorously test the complex reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
OlymMATH features 200 meticulously curated problems, each manually verified and available in parallel English and Chinese versions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T11:20:17Z) - Learning by Analogy: Enhancing Few-Shot Prompting for Math Word Problem Solving with Computational Graph-Based Retrieval [22.865124583257987]
We present how analogy from similarly structured questions can improve large language models' problem-solving capabilities.
Specifically, we rely on the retrieval of problems with similar computational graphs to the given question to serve as exemplars in the prompt.
Empirical results across six math word problem datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-25T15:01:25Z) - ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection [60.297079601066784]
We introduce ErrorRadar, the first benchmark designed to assess MLLMs' capabilities in error detection.
ErrorRadar evaluates two sub-tasks: error step identification and error categorization.
It consists of 2,500 high-quality multimodal K-12 mathematical problems, collected from real-world student interactions.
Results indicate significant challenges still remain, as GPT-4o with best performance is still around 10% behind human evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-06T14:59:09Z) - BEATS: Optimizing LLM Mathematical Capabilities with BackVerify and Adaptive Disambiguate based Efficient Tree Search [22.672130194493793]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited exceptional performance across a broad range of tasks and domains.
They still encounter difficulties in solving mathematical problems due to the rigorous and logical nature of mathematics.
We propose a novel approach, BEATS, to enhance mathematical problem-solving abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-26T15:47:42Z) - LLaMa-SciQ: An Educational Chatbot for Answering Science MCQ [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with tasks requiring mathematical reasoning, particularly multiple-choice questions (MCQs)
We developed LLaMa-SciQ to assist college students in solving and understanding MCQs in STEM fields.
For mathematical reasoning, LLaMa-SciQ achieved 74.5% accuracy on the GSM8k dataset and 30% on the MATH dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-25T09:41:46Z) - SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation.
Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z) - Skywork-Math: Data Scaling Laws for Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models -- The Story Goes On [55.449818944278526]
We introduce the Skywork-Math model series, supervised fine-tuned (SFT) on common 7B language models.
Skywork-Math 7B has achieved impressive accuracies of 51.2% on the competition-level MATH benchmark.
We provide several practical takeaways to enhance math reasoning abilities in LLMs for both research and industry applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-11T09:56:51Z) - Synthetic Multimodal Question Generation [60.33494376081317]
Multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation (MMRAG) is a powerful approach to question-answering over multimodal documents.
We propose SMMQG, a synthetic data generation framework that generates question and answer pairs directly from multimodal documents.
We use SMMQG to generate an MMRAG dataset of 1024 questions over Wikipedia documents and evaluate state-of-the-art models using it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T12:57:42Z) - Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraph [83.90988015005934]
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a critical component of machine learning (ML) applications.
We introduce a novel benchmark that implements a collection of state-of-the-art UQ baselines.
We conduct a large-scale empirical investigation of UQ and normalization techniques across nine tasks, and identify the most promising approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-21T20:06:31Z) - MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time [51.5039731721706]
MindStar is a purely inference-based searching method for large language models.
It formulates reasoning tasks as searching problems and proposes two search ideas to identify the optimal reasoning paths.
It significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of open-source models, such as Llama-2-13B and Mistral-7B, and achieves comparable performance to GPT-3.5 and Grok-1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-25T15:07:33Z) - MathGenie: Generating Synthetic Data with Question Back-translation for Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning of LLMs [38.127313175508746]
MathGenie is a novel method for generating diverse and reliable math problems from a small-scale problem-solution dataset.
Various pretrained models, ranging from 7B to 70B, are trained on the newly curated data to test the effectiveness of the proposed augmentation technique.
MathGenieLM-InternLM2 achieves an accuracy of 87.7% on GSM8K and 55.7% on MATH, securing the best overall score among open-source language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T07:17:25Z) - GeoEval: Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs and Multi-Modal Models on Geometry Problem-Solving [40.46491587796371]
We introduce the GeoEval benchmark, a comprehensive collection that includes a main subset of 2,000 problems, a 750 problems subset focusing on backward reasoning, an augmented subset of 2,000 problems, and a hard subset of 300 problems.
Our evaluation of ten LLMs and MMs across these varied subsets reveals that the WizardMath model excels, achieving a 55.67% accuracy rate on the main subset but only a 6.00% accuracy on the hard subset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T16:59:41Z) - MathCoder: Seamless Code Integration in LLMs for Enhanced Mathematical
Reasoning [52.97768001837269]
We present a method to fine-tune open-source language models, enabling them to use code for modeling and deriving math equations.
We propose a method of generating novel and high-quality datasets with math problems and their code-based solutions.
This approach yields the MathCoder models, a family of models capable of generating code-based solutions for solving challenging math problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T17:52:09Z) - Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For
Large Language Models [23.344490944210456]
We present 515Bench, a more challenging benchmark dataset for evaluating the problem solving abilities of large language models (LLMs)
We curate challenging pre-engineering mathematics, physics and chemistry problems from the highly competitive IIT-Advanced exam.
Our evaluation on various open-source and proprietary models reveals that the highest performance, even after using techniques like self-consistency, self-refinement and chain-of-thought prompting, is less than 40%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T11:55:59Z) - Logic-Guided Data Augmentation and Regularization for Consistent
Question Answering [55.05667583529711]
This paper addresses the problem of improving the accuracy and consistency of responses to comparison questions.
Our method leverages logical and linguistic knowledge to augment labeled training data and then uses a consistency-based regularizer to train the model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T17:03:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.