GeoEval: Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs and Multi-Modal Models on Geometry Problem-Solving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10104v2
• Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 11:42:09 GMT
• Title: GeoEval: Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs and Multi-Modal Models on Geometry Problem-Solving
• Authors: Jiaxin Zhang, Zhongzhi Li, Mingliang Zhang, Fei Yin, Chenglin Liu, Yashar Moshfeghi,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the GeoEval benchmark, a comprehensive collection that includes a main subset of 2,000 problems, a 750 problems subset focusing on backward reasoning, an augmented subset of 2,000 problems, and a hard subset of 300 problems. Our evaluation of ten LLMs and MMs across these varied subsets reveals that the WizardMath model excels, achieving a 55.67% accuracy rate on the main subset but only a 6.00% accuracy on the hard subset.
• Score: 40.46491587796371
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) and multi-modal models (MMs) have demonstrated their remarkable capabilities in problem-solving. Yet, their proficiency in tackling geometry math problems, which necessitates an integrated understanding of both textual and visual information, has not been thoroughly evaluated. To address this gap, we introduce the GeoEval benchmark, a comprehensive collection that includes a main subset of 2,000 problems, a 750 problems subset focusing on backward reasoning, an augmented subset of 2,000 problems, and a hard subset of 300 problems. This benchmark facilitates a deeper investigation into the performance of LLMs and MMs in solving geometry math problems. Our evaluation of ten LLMs and MMs across these varied subsets reveals that the WizardMath model excels, achieving a 55.67\% accuracy rate on the main subset but only a 6.00\% accuracy on the hard subset. This highlights the critical need for testing models against datasets on which they have not been pre-trained. Additionally, our findings indicate that GPT-series models perform more effectively on problems they have rephrased, suggesting a promising method for enhancing model capabilities.

Related papers

• Skywork-Math: Data Scaling Laws for Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models -- The Story Goes On [55.449818944278526]
  We introduce the Skywork-Math model series, supervised fine-tuned (SFT) on common 7B language models. Skywork-Math 7B has achieved impressive accuracies of 51.2% on the competition-level MATH benchmark. We provide several practical takeaways to enhance math reasoning abilities in LLMs for both research and industry applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T09:56:51Z)
• MathOdyssey: Benchmarking Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills in Large Language Models Using Odyssey Math Data [20.31528845718877]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language understanding and demonstrated strong problem-solving abilities. This paper investigates the mathematical problem-solving capabilities of LLMs using the newly developed "MathOdyssey" dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T13:02:35Z)
• MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time [51.5039731721706]
  MindStar is a purely inference-based searching method for large language models. It formulates reasoning tasks as searching problems and proposes two search ideas to identify the optimal reasoning paths. It significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of open-source models, such as Llama-2-13B and Mistral-7B, and achieves comparable performance to GPT-3.5 and Grok-1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T15:07:33Z)
• GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers [68.77382332826167]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various mathematical reasoning benchmarks. One essential and frequently occurring evidence is that when the math questions are slightly changed, LLMs can behave incorrectly. This motivates us to evaluate the robustness of LLMs' math reasoning capability by testing a wide range of question variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T15:26:14Z)
• MathGenie: Generating Synthetic Data with Question Back-translation for Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning of LLMs [39.769464414087935]
  MathGenie is a novel method for generating diverse and reliable math problems from a small-scale problem-solution dataset. Various pretrained models, ranging from 7B to 70B, are trained on the newly curated data to test the effectiveness of the proposed augmentation technique. MathGenieLM-InternLM2 achieves an accuracy of 87.7% on GSM8K and 55.7% on MATH, securing the best overall score among open-source language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T07:17:25Z)
• GeomVerse: A Systematic Evaluation of Large Models for Geometric Reasoning [17.61621287003562]
  We evaluate vision language models (VLMs) along various axes through the lens of geometry problems. We procedurally create a synthetic dataset of geometry questions with controllable difficulty levels along multiple axes. The empirical results obtained using our benchmark for state-of-the-art VLMs indicate that these models are not as capable in subjects like geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T15:25:39Z)
• G-LLaVA: Solving Geometric Problem with Multi-Modal Large Language Model [124.68242155098189]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable proficiency in human-level reasoning and generation capabilities. G-LLaVA demonstrates exceptional performance in solving geometric problems, significantly outperforming GPT-4-V on the MathVista benchmark with only 7B parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T17:36:20Z)
• GLUECons: A Generic Benchmark for Learning Under Constraints [102.78051169725455]
  In this work, we create a benchmark that is a collection of nine tasks in the domains of natural language processing and computer vision. We model external knowledge as constraints, specify the sources of the constraints for each task, and implement various models that use these constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T16:45:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.