Dynamic Q&A of Clinical Documents with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10733v2
• Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:14:29 GMT
• Title: Dynamic Q&A of Clinical Documents with Large Language Models
• Authors: Ran Elgedawy, Ioana Danciu, Maria Mahbub, Sudarshan Srinivasan,
• Abstract summary: This work introduces a natural language interface using large language models (LLMs) for dynamic question-answering on clinical notes. Experiments, utilizing various embedding models and advanced LLMs, show Wizard Vicuna's superior accuracy, albeit with high compute demands.
• Score: 3.021316686584699
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Electronic health records (EHRs) house crucial patient data in clinical notes. As these notes grow in volume and complexity, manual extraction becomes challenging. This work introduces a natural language interface using large language models (LLMs) for dynamic question-answering on clinical notes. Our chatbot, powered by Langchain and transformer-based LLMs, allows users to query in natural language, receiving relevant answers from clinical notes. Experiments, utilizing various embedding models and advanced LLMs, show Wizard Vicuna's superior accuracy, albeit with high compute demands. Model optimization, including weight quantization, improves latency by approximately 48 times. Promising results indicate potential, yet challenges such as model hallucinations and limited diverse medical case evaluations remain. Addressing these gaps is crucial for unlocking the value in clinical notes and advancing AI-driven clinical decision-making.

Related papers

• Harmonising the Clinical Melody: Tuning Large Language Models for Hospital Course Summarisation in Clinical Coding [5.279406017862076]
  The challenge of summarising a hospital course remains an open area for further research and development. We adapted three pre trained LLMs, Llama 3, BioMistral, Mistral Instruct v0.1 for the hospital course summarisation task. The fine tuned models were evaluated using BERTScore and ROUGE metrics to assess the effectiveness of clinical domain fine tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T00:35:23Z)
• Improving Clinical Note Generation from Complex Doctor-Patient Conversation [20.2157016701399]
  We present three key contributions to the field of clinical note generation using large language models (LLMs) First, we introduce CliniKnote, a dataset consisting of 1,200 complex doctor-patient conversations paired with their full clinical notes. Second, we propose K-SOAP, which enhances traditional SOAPcitepodder20soap (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) notes by adding a keyword section at the top, allowing for quick identification of essential information. Third, we develop an automatic pipeline to generate K-SOAP notes from doctor-patient conversations and benchmark various modern LLMs using various
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T18:39:31Z)
• Dr-LLaVA: Visual Instruction Tuning with Symbolic Clinical Grounding [53.629132242389716]
  Vision-Language Models (VLM) can support clinicians by analyzing medical images and engaging in natural language interactions. VLMs often exhibit "hallucinogenic" behavior, generating textual outputs not grounded in contextual multimodal information. We propose a new alignment algorithm that uses symbolic representations of clinical reasoning to ground VLMs in medical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T23:19:28Z)
• AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments [2.567146936147657]
  We introduce AgentClinic, a multimodal agent benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLM) in simulated clinical environments. We find that solving MedQA problems in the sequential decision-making format of AgentClinic is considerably more challenging, resulting in diagnostic accuracies that can drop to below a tenth of the original accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T17:38:53Z)
• Large Language Models in the Clinic: A Comprehensive Benchmark [63.21278434331952]
  We build a benchmark ClinicBench to better understand large language models (LLMs) in the clinic. We first collect eleven existing datasets covering diverse clinical language generation, understanding, and reasoning tasks. We then construct six novel datasets and clinical tasks that are complex but common in real-world practice. We conduct an extensive evaluation of twenty-two LLMs under both zero-shot and few-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T15:51:06Z)
• AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
  We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs. This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios. We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z)
• TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
  Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials. We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z)
• SPeC: A Soft Prompt-Based Calibration on Performance Variability of Large Language Model in Clinical Notes Summarization [50.01382938451978]
  We introduce a model-agnostic pipeline that employs soft prompts to diminish variance while preserving the advantages of prompt-based summarization. Experimental findings indicate that our method not only bolsters performance but also effectively curbs variance for various language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T04:47:46Z)
• Do We Still Need Clinical Language Models? [15.023633270864675]
  We show that relatively small specialized clinical models substantially outperform all in-context learning approaches. We release the code and the models used under the PhysioNet Credentialed Health Data license and data use agreement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T05:08:34Z)
• Rationale production to support clinical decision-making [31.66739991129112]
  We apply InfoCal to the task of predicting hospital readmission using hospital discharge notes. We find each presented model with selected interpretability or feature importance methods yield varying results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T09:02:10Z)
• VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features, Explanations, and Data for Healthcare Models [85.4333256782337]
  VBridge is a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates machine learning explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow. We identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence. We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T17:34:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.