Conformal Prediction Sets Improve Human Decision Making
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13744v3
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 01:12:10 GMT
- Title: Conformal Prediction Sets Improve Human Decision Making
- Authors: Jesse C. Cresswell, Yi Sui, Bhargava Kumar, Noël Vouitsis,
- Abstract summary: We study the usefulness of conformal prediction sets as an aid for human decision making.
We find that when humans are given conformal prediction sets their accuracy on tasks improves compared to fixed-size prediction sets with the same coverage guarantee.
- Score: 5.151594941369301
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In response to everyday queries, humans explicitly signal uncertainty and offer alternative answers when they are unsure. Machine learning models that output calibrated prediction sets through conformal prediction mimic this human behaviour; larger sets signal greater uncertainty while providing alternatives. In this work, we study the usefulness of conformal prediction sets as an aid for human decision making by conducting a pre-registered randomized controlled trial with conformal prediction sets provided to human subjects. With statistical significance, we find that when humans are given conformal prediction sets their accuracy on tasks improves compared to fixed-size prediction sets with the same coverage guarantee. The results show that quantifying model uncertainty with conformal prediction is helpful for human-in-the-loop decision making and human-AI teams.
Related papers
- Bin-Conditional Conformal Prediction of Fatalities from Armed Conflict [0.5312303275762104]
We introduce a novel extension to conformal prediction algorithm which we call bin-conditional conformal prediction.
This method allows users to obtain individual-level prediction intervals for any arbitrary prediction model.
We apply the bin-conditional conformal prediction algorithm to forecast fatalities from armed conflict.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T14:41:42Z) - Performative Prediction on Games and Mechanism Design [69.7933059664256]
We study a collective risk dilemma where agents decide whether to trust predictions based on past accuracy.
As predictions shape collective outcomes, social welfare arises naturally as a metric of concern.
We show how to achieve better trade-offs and use them for mechanism design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-09T16:03:44Z) - Towards Human-AI Complementarity with Prediction Sets [14.071862670474832]
Decision support systems based on prediction sets have proven to be effective at helping human experts solve classification tasks.
We show that the prediction sets constructed using conformal prediction are, in general, suboptimal in terms of average accuracy.
We introduce a greedy algorithm that, for a large class of expert models and non-optimal scores, is guaranteed to find prediction sets that provably offer equal or greater performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T18:00:00Z) - Efficient Normalized Conformal Prediction and Uncertainty Quantification
for Anti-Cancer Drug Sensitivity Prediction with Deep Regression Forests [0.0]
Conformal Prediction has emerged as a promising method to pair machine learning models with prediction intervals.
We propose a method to estimate the uncertainty of each sample by calculating the variance obtained from a Deep Regression Forest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T19:09:53Z) - Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation.
We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z) - CovarianceNet: Conditional Generative Model for Correct Covariance
Prediction in Human Motion Prediction [71.31516599226606]
We present a new method to correctly predict the uncertainty associated with the predicted distribution of future trajectories.
Our approach, CovariaceNet, is based on a Conditional Generative Model with Gaussian latent variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-07T09:38:24Z) - Test-time Collective Prediction [73.74982509510961]
Multiple parties in machine learning want to jointly make predictions on future test points.
Agents wish to benefit from the collective expertise of the full set of agents, but may not be willing to release their data or model parameters.
We explore a decentralized mechanism to make collective predictions at test time, leveraging each agent's pre-trained model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-22T18:29:58Z) - Optimized conformal classification using gradient descent approximation [0.2538209532048866]
Conformal predictors allow predictions to be made with a user-defined confidence level.
We consider an approach to train the conformal predictor directly with maximum predictive efficiency.
We test the method on several real world data sets and find that the method is promising.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-24T13:14:41Z) - Private Prediction Sets [72.75711776601973]
Machine learning systems need reliable uncertainty quantification and protection of individuals' privacy.
We present a framework that treats these two desiderata jointly.
We evaluate the method on large-scale computer vision datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-11T18:59:11Z) - When Does Uncertainty Matter?: Understanding the Impact of Predictive
Uncertainty in ML Assisted Decision Making [68.19284302320146]
We carry out user studies to assess how people with differing levels of expertise respond to different types of predictive uncertainty.
We found that showing posterior predictive distributions led to smaller disagreements with the ML model's predictions.
This suggests that posterior predictive distributions can potentially serve as useful decision aids which should be used with caution and take into account the type of distribution and the expertise of the human.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-12T02:23:53Z) - Fast, Optimal, and Targeted Predictions using Parametrized Decision
Analysis [0.0]
We develop a class of parametrized actions for Bayesian decision analysis that produce optimal, scalable, and simple targeted predictions.
Predictions are constructed for physical activity data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-23T15:55:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.