Tradeoffs Between Alignment and Helpfulness in Language Models with Representation Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16332v4
• Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 13:40:39 GMT
• Title: Tradeoffs Between Alignment and Helpfulness in Language Models with Representation Engineering
• Authors: Yotam Wolf, Noam Wies, Dorin Shteyman, Binyamin Rothberg, Yoav Levine, Amnon Shashua,
• Abstract summary: We study the tradeoff between the increase in alignment and decrease in helpfulness of the model. Under the conditions of our framework, alignment can be guaranteed with representation engineering. We show that helpfulness is harmed quadratically with the norm of the representation engineering vector.
• Score: 15.471566708181824
• License:
• Abstract: Language model alignment has become an important component of AI safety, allowing safe interactions between humans and language models, by enhancing desired behaviors and inhibiting undesired ones. It is often done by tuning the model or inserting preset aligning prompts. Recently, representation engineering, a method which alters the model's behavior via changing its representations post-training, was shown to be effective in aligning LLMs (Zou et al., 2023a). Representation engineering yields gains in alignment oriented tasks such as resistance to adversarial attacks and reduction of social biases, but was also shown to cause a decrease in the ability of the model to perform basic tasks. In this paper we study the tradeoff between the increase in alignment and decrease in helpfulness of the model. We propose a theoretical framework which provides bounds for these two quantities, and demonstrate their relevance empirically. First, we find that under the conditions of our framework, alignment can be guaranteed with representation engineering, and at the same time that helpfulness is harmed in the process. Second, we show that helpfulness is harmed quadratically with the norm of the representation engineering vector, while the alignment increases linearly with it, indicating a regime in which it is efficient to use representation engineering. We validate our findings empirically, and chart the boundaries to the usefulness of representation engineering for alignment.

Related papers

• A Timeline and Analysis for Representation Plasticity in Large Language Models [0.0]
  This paper aims to understand how "honesty" and model plasticity evolve by applying steering extracted at different fine-tuning stages. The findings are pivotal, showing that while early steering exhibits high plasticity, later stages have a surprisingly responsive critical window. These insights greatly contribute to the field of AI transparency, addressing a pressing lack of efficiency limiting our ability to effectively steer model behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:34:15Z)
• Stationary Representations: Optimally Approximating Compatibility and Implications for Improved Model Replacements [20.96380700548786]
  Learning compatible representations enables the interchangeable use of semantic features as models are updated over time. This is particularly relevant in search and retrieval systems where it is crucial to avoid reprocessing of the gallery images with the updated model. We show that the stationary representations learned by the $d$-Simplex fixed classifier optimally approximate compatibility representation according to the two inequality constraints of its formal definition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T06:31:38Z)
• Understanding the Learning Dynamics of Alignment with Human Feedback [17.420727709895736]
  This paper provides an attempt to theoretically analyze the learning dynamics of human preference alignment. We show how the distribution of preference datasets influences the rate of model updates and provide rigorous guarantees on the training accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T16:39:28Z)
• Learning reduced-order Quadratic-Linear models in Process Engineering using Operator Inference [7.471096682644106]
  This work addresses the challenge of efficiently modeling dynamical systems in process engineering. We use reduced-order model learning, specifically operator inference. The application in our study is carbon dioxide methanation, an important reaction within the Power-to-X framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T17:21:10Z)
• Intervention Lens: from Representation Surgery to String Counterfactuals [106.98481791980367]
  Interventions targeting the representation space of language models (LMs) have emerged as an effective means to influence model behavior. We give a method to convert representation counterfactuals into string counterfactuals. The resulting counterfactuals can be used to mitigate bias in classification through data augmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T18:12:02Z)
• InferAligner: Inference-Time Alignment for Harmlessness through Cross-Model Guidance [56.184255657175335]
  We develop textbfInferAligner, a novel inference-time alignment method that utilizes cross-model guidance for harmlessness alignment. Experimental results show that our method can be very effectively applied to domain-specific models in finance, medicine, and mathematics. It significantly diminishes the Attack Success Rate (ASR) of both harmful instructions and jailbreak attacks, while maintaining almost unchanged performance in downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-20T10:41:03Z)
• Fundamental Limitations of Alignment in Large Language Models [16.393916864600193]
  An important aspect in developing language models that interact with humans is aligning their behavior to be useful and unharmful. This is usually achieved by tuning the model in a way that enhances desired behaviors and inhibits undesired ones. We propose a theoretical approach called Behavior Expectation Bounds (BEB) which allows us to formally investigate several inherent characteristics and limitations of alignment in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T17:50:09Z)
• Fair Interpretable Representation Learning with Correction Vectors [60.0806628713968]
  We propose a new framework for fair representation learning that is centered around the learning of "correction vectors" We show experimentally that several fair representation learning models constrained in such a way do not exhibit losses in ranking or classification performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T11:19:23Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Fair Representations [50.95604482330149]
  Trained classification models can unintentionally lead to biased representations and predictions. Existing debiasing methods for classification models, such as adversarial training, are often expensive to train and difficult to optimise. We propose a method for mitigating bias by incorporating contrastive learning, in which instances sharing the same class label are encouraged to have similar representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T10:47:51Z)
• SLUA: A Super Lightweight Unsupervised Word Alignment Model via Cross-Lingual Contrastive Learning [79.91678610678885]
  We propose a super lightweight unsupervised word alignment model (SLUA) Experimental results on several public benchmarks demonstrate that our model achieves competitive, if not better, performance. Notably, we recognize our model as a pioneer attempt to unify bilingual word embedding and word alignments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T05:54:11Z)
• High-Fidelity Synthesis with Disentangled Representation [60.19657080953252]
  We propose an Information-Distillation Generative Adrial Network (ID-GAN) for disentanglement learning and high-fidelity synthesis. Our method learns disentangled representation using VAE-based models, and distills the learned representation with an additional nuisance variable to the separate GAN-based generator for high-fidelity synthesis. Despite the simplicity, we show that the proposed method is highly effective, achieving comparable image generation quality to the state-of-the-art methods using the disentangled representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T14:39:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.