Fundamental Limitations of Alignment in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11082v6
• Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:19:16 GMT
• Title: Fundamental Limitations of Alignment in Large Language Models
• Authors: Yotam Wolf, Noam Wies, Oshri Avnery, Yoav Levine, Amnon Shashua,
• Abstract summary: An important aspect in developing language models that interact with humans is aligning their behavior to be useful and unharmful. This is usually achieved by tuning the model in a way that enhances desired behaviors and inhibits undesired ones. We propose a theoretical approach called Behavior Expectation Bounds (BEB) which allows us to formally investigate several inherent characteristics and limitations of alignment in large language models.
• Score: 16.393916864600193
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: An important aspect in developing language models that interact with humans is aligning their behavior to be useful and unharmful for their human users. This is usually achieved by tuning the model in a way that enhances desired behaviors and inhibits undesired ones, a process referred to as alignment. In this paper, we propose a theoretical approach called Behavior Expectation Bounds (BEB) which allows us to formally investigate several inherent characteristics and limitations of alignment in large language models. Importantly, we prove that within the limits of this framework, for any behavior that has a finite probability of being exhibited by the model, there exist prompts that can trigger the model into outputting this behavior, with probability that increases with the length of the prompt. This implies that any alignment process that attenuates an undesired behavior but does not remove it altogether, is not safe against adversarial prompting attacks. Furthermore, our framework hints at the mechanism by which leading alignment approaches such as reinforcement learning from human feedback make the LLM prone to being prompted into the undesired behaviors. This theoretical result is being experimentally demonstrated in large scale by the so called contemporary "chatGPT jailbreaks", where adversarial users trick the LLM into breaking its alignment guardrails by triggering it into acting as a malicious persona. Our results expose fundamental limitations in alignment of LLMs and bring to the forefront the need to devise reliable mechanisms for ensuring AI safety.

Related papers

• Compromising Honesty and Harmlessness in Language Models via Deception Attacks [0.04499833362998487]
  "Deception attacks" customize models to mislead users when prompted on chosen topics while remaining accurate on others. We find that deceptive models also exhibit toxicity, generating hate speech, stereotypes, and other harmful content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T11:02:59Z)
• Model Tampering Attacks Enable More Rigorous Evaluations of LLM Capabilities [49.09703018511403]
  Large language model (LLM) risks and capabilities are increasingly being incorporated into AI risk management and governance frameworks. Currently, most risk evaluations are conducted by designing inputs that elicit harmful behaviors from the system. We propose evaluating LLMs with model tampering attacks which allow for modifications to latent activations or weights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:59:16Z)
• Deception in LLMs: Self-Preservation and Autonomous Goals in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Recent advances in Large Language Models have incorporated planning and reasoning capabilities. This has reduced errors in mathematical and logical tasks while improving accuracy. Our study examines DeepSeek R1, a model trained to output reasoning tokens similar to OpenAI's o1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T21:26:37Z)
• Turning Logic Against Itself : Probing Model Defenses Through Contrastive Questions [51.51850981481236]
  We introduce POATE, a novel jailbreak technique that harnesses contrastive reasoning to provoke unethical responses. PoATE crafts semantically opposing intents and integrates them with adversarial templates, steering models toward harmful outputs with remarkable subtlety. To counter this, we propose Intent-Aware CoT and Reverse Thinking CoT, which decompose queries to detect malicious intent and reason in reverse to evaluate and reject harmful responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-03T15:40:03Z)
• Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Models [64.60765108418062]
  We introduce Deliberative Alignment, a new paradigm that teaches the model safety specifications and trains it to explicitly recall and accurately reason over the specifications before answering. We used this approach to align OpenAI's o-series models, and achieved highly precise adherence to OpenAI's safety policies, without requiring human-written chain-of-thoughts or answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T21:00:11Z)
• Tuning-Free Accountable Intervention for LLM Deployment -- A Metacognitive Approach [55.613461060997004]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have catalyzed transformative advances across a spectrum of natural language processing tasks. We propose an innovative textitmetacognitive approach, dubbed textbfCLEAR, to equip LLMs with capabilities for self-aware error identification and correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T19:18:53Z)
• DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Models [59.63643988872571]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are nowadays expected to generate content aligned with human preferences. We propose DeAL, a framework that allows the user to customize reward functions and enables Detime Alignment of LLMs. Our experiments show that we can DeAL with fine-grained trade-offs, improve adherence to alignment objectives, and address residual gaps in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T06:12:29Z)
• InferAligner: Inference-Time Alignment for Harmlessness through Cross-Model Guidance [56.184255657175335]
  We develop textbfInferAligner, a novel inference-time alignment method that utilizes cross-model guidance for harmlessness alignment. Experimental results show that our method can be very effectively applied to domain-specific models in finance, medicine, and mathematics. It significantly diminishes the Attack Success Rate (ASR) of both harmful instructions and jailbreak attacks, while maintaining almost unchanged performance in downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-20T10:41:03Z)
• Open Sesame! Universal Black Box Jailbreaking of Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are designed to provide helpful and safe responses. LLMs often rely on alignment techniques to align with user intent and social guidelines. We introduce a novel approach that employs a genetic algorithm (GA) to manipulate LLMs when model architecture and parameters are inaccessible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T08:54:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.