Compressed image quality assessment using stacking
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00993v1
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 20:12:26 GMT
- Title: Compressed image quality assessment using stacking
- Authors: S. Farhad Hosseini-Benvidi, Hossein Motamednia, Azadeh Mansouri,
Mohammadreza Raei, Ahmad Mahmoudi-Aznaveh
- Abstract summary: Generalization can be regarded as the major challenge in compressed image quality assessment.
Both semantic and low-level information are employed in the presented IQA to predict the human visual system.
The accuracy of the quality benchmark of the clic2024 perceptual image challenge was achieved 79.6%.
- Score: 4.971244477217376
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: It is well-known that there is no universal metric for image quality
evaluation. In this case, distortion-specific metrics can be more reliable. The
artifact imposed by image compression can be considered as a combination of
various distortions. Depending on the image context, this combination can be
different. As a result, Generalization can be regarded as the major challenge
in compressed image quality assessment. In this approach, stacking is employed
to provide a reliable method. Both semantic and low-level information are
employed in the presented IQA to predict the human visual system. Moreover, the
results of the Full-Reference (FR) and No-Reference (NR) models are aggregated
to improve the proposed Full-Reference method for compressed image quality
evaluation. The accuracy of the quality benchmark of the clic2024 perceptual
image challenge was achieved 79.6\%, which illustrates the effectiveness of the
proposed fusion-based approach.
Related papers
- Fine-grained subjective visual quality assessment for high-fidelity compressed images [4.787528476079247]
The JPEG standardization project AIC is developing a subjective image quality assessment methodology for high-fidelity images.
This paper presents the proposed assessment methods, a dataset of high-quality compressed images, and their corresponding crowdsourced visual quality ratings.
It also outlines a data analysis approach that reconstructs quality scale values in just noticeable difference (JND) units.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-12T11:37:19Z) - Less is More: Learning Reference Knowledge Using No-Reference Image
Quality Assessment [58.09173822651016]
We argue that it is possible to learn reference knowledge under the No-Reference Image Quality Assessment setting.
We propose a new framework to learn comparative knowledge from non-aligned reference images.
Experiments on eight standard NR-IQA datasets demonstrate the superior performance to the state-of-the-art NR-IQA methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-01T13:56:01Z) - BAND-2k: Banding Artifact Noticeable Database for Banding Detection and
Quality Assessment [52.1640725073183]
Banding, also known as staircase-like contours, frequently occurs in flat areas of images/videos processed by the compression or quantization algorithms.
We build the largest banding IQA database so far, named Banding Artifact Noticeable Database (BAND-2k), which consists of 2,000 banding images.
A dual convolutional neural network is employed to concurrently learn the feature representation from the high-frequency and low-frequency maps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-29T15:56:31Z) - ARNIQA: Learning Distortion Manifold for Image Quality Assessment [28.773037051085318]
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) aims to develop methods to measure image quality in alignment with human perception without the need for a high-quality reference image.
We propose a self-supervised approach named ARNIQA for modeling the image distortion manifold to obtain quality representations in an intrinsic manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T17:22:25Z) - PIQI: Perceptual Image Quality Index based on Ensemble of Gaussian
Process Regression [2.9412539021452715]
Perceptual Image Quality Index (PIQI) is proposed to assess the quality of digital images.
The performance of the PIQI is checked on six benchmark databases and compared with twelve state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-16T06:44:17Z) - Conformer and Blind Noisy Students for Improved Image Quality Assessment [80.57006406834466]
Learning-based approaches for perceptual image quality assessment (IQA) usually require both the distorted and reference image for measuring the perceptual quality accurately.
In this work, we explore the performance of transformer-based full-reference IQA models.
We also propose a method for IQA based on semi-supervised knowledge distillation from full-reference teacher models into blind student models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-27T10:21:08Z) - Confusing Image Quality Assessment: Towards Better Augmented Reality
Experience [96.29124666702566]
We consider AR technology as the superimposition of virtual scenes and real scenes, and introduce visual confusion as its basic theory.
A ConFusing Image Quality Assessment (CFIQA) database is established, which includes 600 reference images and 300 distorted images generated by mixing reference images in pairs.
An objective metric termed CFIQA is also proposed to better evaluate the confusing image quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-11T07:03:06Z) - Image Quality Assessment using Contrastive Learning [50.265638572116984]
We train a deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using a contrastive pairwise objective to solve the auxiliary problem.
We show through extensive experiments that CONTRIQUE achieves competitive performance when compared to state-of-the-art NR image quality models.
Our results suggest that powerful quality representations with perceptual relevance can be obtained without requiring large labeled subjective image quality datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-25T21:01:00Z) - Learning Conditional Knowledge Distillation for Degraded-Reference Image
Quality Assessment [157.1292674649519]
We propose a practical solution named degraded-reference IQA (DR-IQA)
DR-IQA exploits the inputs of IR models, degraded images, as references.
Our results can even be close to the performance of full-reference settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-18T02:35:08Z) - Residual Networks based Distortion Classification and Ranking for
Laparoscopic Image Quality Assessment [12.374294852377382]
Laparoscopic images and videos are often affected by different types of distortion like noise, smoke, blur and nonuniform illumination.
We propose in this paper to formulate the image quality assessment task as a multi-label classification problem taking into account both the type as well as the severity level (or rank) of distortions.
The obtained results on a laparoscopic image dataset show the efficiency of the proposed approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-12T14:26:11Z) - Deep Perceptual Image Quality Assessment for Compression [12.868773445948507]
We propose the largest image compression quality dataset to date with human perceptual preferences.
We show that the proposed model can effectively learn from thousands of examples available in the new dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-01T16:31:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.