Copyleft for Alleviating AIGC Copyright Dilemma: What-if Analysis, Public Perception and Implications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12216v1
• Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:20:35 GMT
• Title: Copyleft for Alleviating AIGC Copyright Dilemma: What-if Analysis, Public Perception and Implications
• Authors: Xinwei Guo, Yujun Li, Yafeng Peng, Xuetao Wei
• Abstract summary: AIGC copyright dilemma can immensely stifle the development of AIGC and greatly cost the entire society. Previous work advocated copyleft on AI governance but without substantive analysis. Key findings include: a) people generally perceive the dilemma, b) they prefer to use authorized AIGC under loose restriction, and c) they are positive to copyleft in AIGC and willing to use it in the future.
• Score: 4.959125079708047
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As AIGC has impacted our society profoundly in the past years, ethical issues have received tremendous attention. The most urgent one is the AIGC copyright dilemma, which can immensely stifle the development of AIGC and greatly cost the entire society. Given the complexity of AIGC copyright governance and the fact that no perfect solution currently exists, previous work advocated copyleft on AI governance but without substantive analysis. In this paper, we take a step further to explore the feasibility of copyleft to alleviate the AIGC copyright dilemma. We conduct a mixed-methods study from two aspects: qualitatively, we use a formal what-if analysis to clarify the dilemma and provide case studies to show the feasibility of copyleft; quantitatively, we perform a carefully designed survey to find out how the public feels about copylefting AIGC. The key findings include: a) people generally perceive the dilemma, b) they prefer to use authorized AIGC under loose restriction, and c) they are positive to copyleft in AIGC and willing to use it in the future.

Related papers

• SoK: On the Role and Future of AIGC Watermarking in the Era of Gen-AI [24.187726079290357]
  AIGC watermarks offer an effective solution to mitigate malicious activities. We provide a taxonomy based on the core properties of the watermark. We discuss the functionality and security threats of AIGC watermarking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T11:26:42Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• Problem Solving Through Human-AI Preference-Based Cooperation [74.39233146428492]
  We propose HAI-Co2, a novel human-AI co-construction framework. We formalize HAI-Co2 and discuss the difficult open research problems that it faces. We present a case study of HAI-Co2 and demonstrate its efficacy compared to monolithic generative AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:06:57Z)
• AIGC-Chain: A Blockchain-Enabled Full Lifecycle Recording System for AIGC Product Copyright Management [30.690595004607385]
  The current legal framework for copyright and intellectual property is grounded in the concept of human authorship. In the creation of AIGC, human creators provide conceptual ideas, with AI independently responsible for the expressive elements. It is imperative to reassess the intellectual contributions of all parties involved in the creation of AIGC to ensure a fair allocation of copyright ownership.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T08:22:39Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Generative AI and Copyright: A Dynamic Perspective [0.0]
  generative AI is poised to disrupt the creative industry. The compensation to creators whose content has been used to train generative AI models (the fair use standard) and the eligibility of AI-generated content for copyright protection (AI-copyrightability) are key issues. This paper aims to better understand the economic implications of these two regulatory issues and their interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T07:12:48Z)
• Responsible AI Considerations in Text Summarization Research: A Review of Current Practices [89.85174013619883]
  We focus on text summarization, a common NLP task largely overlooked by the responsible AI community. We conduct a multi-round qualitative analysis of 333 summarization papers from the ACL Anthology published between 2020-2022. We focus on how, which, and when responsible AI issues are covered, which relevant stakeholders are considered, and mismatches between stated and realized research goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T15:35:36Z)
• AI Ethics and Ordoliberalism 2.0: Towards A 'Digital Bill of Rights' [0.0]
  This article analyzes AI ethics from a distinct business ethics perspective, i.e., 'ordoliberalism 2.0' It argues that the ongoing discourse on (generative) AI relies too much on corporate self-regulation and voluntary codes of conduct. The paper suggests merging already existing AI guidelines with an ordoliberal-inspired regulatory and competition policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T10:26:12Z)
• ChatGPT and Works Scholarly: Best Practices and Legal Pitfalls in Writing with AI [9.550238260901121]
  We offer approaches to evaluating whether or not such AI-writing violates copyright or falls within the safe harbor of fair use. As AI is likely to grow more capable in the coming years, it is appropriate to begin integrating AI into scholarly writing activities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T15:38:20Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence [81.04070052740596]
  Legal Artificial Intelligence (LegalAI) focuses on applying the technology of artificial intelligence, especially natural language processing, to benefit tasks in the legal domain. This paper introduces the history, the current state, and the future directions of research in LegalAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-25T14:45:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.