Copyleft for Alleviating AIGC Copyright Dilemma: What-if Analysis,
Public Perception and Implications
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12216v1
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:20:35 GMT
- Title: Copyleft for Alleviating AIGC Copyright Dilemma: What-if Analysis,
Public Perception and Implications
- Authors: Xinwei Guo, Yujun Li, Yafeng Peng, Xuetao Wei
- Abstract summary: AIGC copyright dilemma can immensely stifle the development of AIGC and greatly cost the entire society.
Previous work advocated copyleft on AI governance but without substantive analysis.
Key findings include: a) people generally perceive the dilemma, b) they prefer to use authorized AIGC under loose restriction, and c) they are positive to copyleft in AIGC and willing to use it in the future.
- Score: 4.959125079708047
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As AIGC has impacted our society profoundly in the past years, ethical issues
have received tremendous attention. The most urgent one is the AIGC copyright
dilemma, which can immensely stifle the development of AIGC and greatly cost
the entire society. Given the complexity of AIGC copyright governance and the
fact that no perfect solution currently exists, previous work advocated
copyleft on AI governance but without substantive analysis. In this paper, we
take a step further to explore the feasibility of copyleft to alleviate the
AIGC copyright dilemma. We conduct a mixed-methods study from two aspects:
qualitatively, we use a formal what-if analysis to clarify the dilemma and
provide case studies to show the feasibility of copyleft; quantitatively, we
perform a carefully designed survey to find out how the public feels about
copylefting AIGC. The key findings include: a) people generally perceive the
dilemma, b) they prefer to use authorized AIGC under loose restriction, and c)
they are positive to copyleft in AIGC and willing to use it in the future.
Related papers
- AIGC-Chain: A Blockchain-Enabled Full Lifecycle Recording System for AIGC Product Copyright Management [30.690595004607385]
The current legal framework for copyright and intellectual property is grounded in the concept of human authorship.
In the creation of AIGC, human creators provide conceptual ideas, with AI independently responsible for the expressive elements.
It is imperative to reassess the intellectual contributions of all parties involved in the creation of AIGC to ensure a fair allocation of copyright ownership.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-21T08:22:39Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
Particip-AI is a framework to gather current and future AI use cases and their harms and benefits from non-expert public.
We gather responses from 295 demographically diverse participants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - Generative AI and Copyright: A Dynamic Perspective [0.0]
generative AI is poised to disrupt the creative industry.
The compensation to creators whose content has been used to train generative AI models (the fair use standard) and the eligibility of AI-generated content for copyright protection (AI-copyrightability) are key issues.
This paper aims to better understand the economic implications of these two regulatory issues and their interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T07:12:48Z) - Responsible AI Considerations in Text Summarization Research: A Review
of Current Practices [89.85174013619883]
We focus on text summarization, a common NLP task largely overlooked by the responsible AI community.
We conduct a multi-round qualitative analysis of 333 summarization papers from the ACL Anthology published between 2020-2022.
We focus on how, which, and when responsible AI issues are covered, which relevant stakeholders are considered, and mismatches between stated and realized research goals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-18T15:35:36Z) - AI Ethics and Ordoliberalism 2.0: Towards A 'Digital Bill of Rights' [0.0]
This article analyzes AI ethics from a distinct business ethics perspective, i.e., 'ordoliberalism 2.0'
It argues that the ongoing discourse on (generative) AI relies too much on corporate self-regulation and voluntary codes of conduct.
The paper suggests merging already existing AI guidelines with an ordoliberal-inspired regulatory and competition policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T10:26:12Z) - ChatGPT and Works Scholarly: Best Practices and Legal Pitfalls in
Writing with AI [9.550238260901121]
We offer approaches to evaluating whether or not such AI-writing violates copyright or falls within the safe harbor of fair use.
As AI is likely to grow more capable in the coming years, it is appropriate to begin integrating AI into scholarly writing activities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-04T15:38:20Z) - Training Is Everything: Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, and Fair
Training [9.653656920225858]
Authors: Companies that use such content to train their AI engine often believe such usage should be considered "fair use"
Authors: Copyright owners, as well as their supporters, consider the incorporation of copyrighted works into training sets for AI to constitute misappropriation of owners' intellectual property.
We identify both strong and spurious arguments on both sides of this debate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-04T04:01:00Z) - Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time.
We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups.
If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and
Stir" [76.44130385507894]
This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices.
Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z) - How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial
Intelligence [81.04070052740596]
Legal Artificial Intelligence (LegalAI) focuses on applying the technology of artificial intelligence, especially natural language processing, to benefit tasks in the legal domain.
This paper introduces the history, the current state, and the future directions of research in LegalAI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-25T14:45:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.