XRL-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating and Comparing Explainable Reinforcement Learning Techniques

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12685v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 03:20:37 GMT
• Title: XRL-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating and Comparing Explainable Reinforcement Learning Techniques
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has demonstrated substantial potential across diverse fields, yet understanding its decision-making process is an ongoing challenge. This paper delves in to Explainable RL (XRL), a subfield of Explainable AI (XAI) aimed at unravelling the complexities of RL models. Our focus rests on state-explaining techniques, a crucial subset within XRL methods, as they reveal the underlying factors influencing an agent's actions at any given time.
• Score: 36.28161138606551
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has demonstrated substantial potential across diverse fields, yet understanding its decision-making process, especially in real-world scenarios where rationality and safety are paramount, is an ongoing challenge. This paper delves in to Explainable RL (XRL), a subfield of Explainable AI (XAI) aimed at unravelling the complexities of RL models. Our focus rests on state-explaining techniques, a crucial subset within XRL methods, as they reveal the underlying factors influencing an agent's actions at any given time. Despite their significant role, the lack of a unified evaluation framework hinders assessment of their accuracy and effectiveness. To address this, we introduce XRL-Bench, a unified standardized benchmark tailored for the evaluation and comparison of XRL methods, encompassing three main modules: standard RL environments, explainers based on state importance, and standard evaluators. XRL-Bench supports both tabular and image data for state explanation. We also propose TabularSHAP, an innovative and competitive XRL method. We demonstrate the practical utility of TabularSHAP in real-world online gaming services and offer an open-source benchmark platform for the straightforward implementation and evaluation of XRL methods. Our contributions facilitate the continued progression of XRL technology.

Related papers

• Evaluating RL Explainability Methods by How Much They Help Fix Bugs in Agents [8.58480571859241]
  This paper outlines a benchmark for Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) methods.<n>We suggest evaluating XRL methods by how effectively their generated explanations help to diagnose and fix malfunctioning reinforcement learning (RL) agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T08:46:26Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning [93.00629872970364]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the dominant paradigm for improving the performance of language models on complex reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce SPARKLE, a fine-grained analytic framework to dissect the effects of RL across three key dimensions.<n>We study whether difficult problems -- those yielding no RL signals and mixed-quality reasoning traces -- can still be effectively used for training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:53:59Z)
• Beyond Markovian: Reflective Exploration via Bayes-Adaptive RL for LLM Reasoning [55.36978389831446]
  We recast reflective exploration within the Bayes-Adaptive RL framework.<n>Our resulting algorithm, BARL, instructs the LLM to stitch and switch strategies based on observed outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T22:51:00Z)
• Leveraging Reward Consistency for Interpretable Feature Discovery in Reinforcement Learning [69.19840497497503]
  It is argued that the commonly used action matching principle is more like an explanation of deep neural networks (DNNs) than the interpretation of RL agents. We propose to consider rewards, the essential objective of RL agents, as the essential objective of interpreting RL agents. We verify and evaluate our method on the Atari 2600 games as well as Duckietown, a challenging self-driving car simulator environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T09:09:54Z)
• A User Study on Explainable Online Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Systems [0.802904964931021]
  Online reinforcement learning (RL) is increasingly used for realizing adaptive systems in the presence of design time uncertainty. Deep RL gaining interest, the learned knowledge is no longer explicitly represented, but is represented as a neural network. XRL-DINE provides visual insights into why certain decisions were made at important time points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T05:12:42Z)
• A Survey on Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Concepts, Algorithms, Challenges [38.70863329476517]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a popular machine learning paradigm where intelligent agents interact with the environment to fulfill a long-term goal. Despite the encouraging results achieved, the deep neural network-based backbone is widely deemed as a black box that impedes practitioners to trust and employ trained agents in realistic scenarios where high security and reliability are essential. To alleviate this issue, a large volume of literature devoted to shedding light on the inner workings of the intelligent agents has been proposed, by constructing intrinsic interpretability or post-hoc explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T13:52:06Z)
• Mastering the Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning Benchmark from Pixels [112.63440666617494]
  Reinforcement learning algorithms can succeed but require large amounts of interactions between the agent and the environment. We propose a new method to solve it, using unsupervised model-based RL, for pre-training the agent. We show robust performance on the Real-Word RL benchmark, hinting at resiliency to environment perturbations during adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-24T14:22:29Z)
• LCRL: Certified Policy Synthesis via Logically-Constrained Reinforcement Learning [78.2286146954051]
  LCRL implements model-free Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms over unknown Decision Processes (MDPs) We present case studies to demonstrate the applicability, ease of use, scalability, and performance of LCRL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T13:21:00Z)
• Contextualize Me -- The Case for Context in Reinforcement Learning [49.794253971446416]
  Contextual Reinforcement Learning (cRL) provides a framework to model such changes in a principled manner. We show how cRL contributes to improving zero-shot generalization in RL through meaningful benchmarks and structured reasoning about generalization tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T15:01:59Z)
• Explainable Reinforcement Learning for Broad-XAI: A Conceptual Framework and Survey [0.7366405857677226]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods provide a potential backbone for the cognitive model required for the development of Broad-XAI. RL represents a suite of approaches that have had increasing success in solving a range of sequential decision-making problems. This paper aims to introduce a conceptual framework, called the Causal XRL Framework (CXF), that unifies the current XRL research and uses RL as a backbone to the development of Broad-XAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-20T05:18:50Z)
• Heuristic-Guided Reinforcement Learning [31.056460162389783]
  Tabula rasa RL algorithms require environment interactions or computation that scales with the horizon of the decision-making task. Our framework can be viewed as a horizon-based regularization for controlling bias and variance in RL under a finite interaction budget. In particular, we introduce the novel concept of an "improvable" -- a that allows an RL agent to extrapolate beyond its prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T00:04:09Z)
• RL Unplugged: A Suite of Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning [108.9599280270704]
  We propose a benchmark called RL Unplugged to evaluate and compare offline RL methods. RL Unplugged includes data from a diverse range of domains including games and simulated motor control problems. We will release data for all our tasks and open-source all algorithms presented in this paper.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T17:14:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.