Unveiling the Potential of Robustness in Evaluating Causal Inference
Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18392v1
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:12:24 GMT
- Title: Unveiling the Potential of Robustness in Evaluating Causal Inference
Models
- Authors: Yiyan Huang, Cheuk Hang Leung, Siyi Wang, Yijun Li, Qi Wu
- Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel approach, the Distributionally Robust Metric (DRM) for CATE estimator selection.
The DRM eliminates the need to fit additional models and excels at selecting a robust CATE estimator.
Experimental studies demonstrate the efficacy of the DRM method.
- Score: 20.44182029097155
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: The growing demand for personalized decision-making has led to a surge of
interest in estimating the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE). The
intersection of machine learning and causal inference has yielded various
effective CATE estimators. However, deploying these estimators in practice is
often hindered by the absence of counterfactual labels, making it challenging
to select the desirable CATE estimator using conventional model selection
procedures like cross-validation. Existing approaches for CATE estimator
selection, such as plug-in and pseudo-outcome metrics, face two inherent
challenges. Firstly, they are required to determine the metric form and the
underlying machine learning models for fitting nuisance parameters or plug-in
learners. Secondly, they lack a specific focus on selecting a robust estimator.
To address these challenges, this paper introduces a novel approach, the
Distributionally Robust Metric (DRM), for CATE estimator selection. The
proposed DRM not only eliminates the need to fit additional models but also
excels at selecting a robust CATE estimator. Experimental studies demonstrate
the efficacy of the DRM method, showcasing its consistent effectiveness in
identifying superior estimators while mitigating the risk of selecting inferior
ones.
Related papers
- Causal Q-Aggregation for CATE Model Selection [24.094860486378167]
We propose a new CATE ensembling approach based on Qaggregation using the doubly robust loss.
Our main result shows that causal Q-aggregation achieves statistically optimal model selection regret rates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T19:27:05Z) - Hyperparameter Tuning and Model Evaluation in Causal Effect Estimation [2.7823528791601686]
This paper investigates the interplay between the four different aspects of model evaluation for causal effect estimation.
We find that most causal estimators are roughly equivalent in performance if tuned thoroughly enough.
We call for more research into causal model evaluation to unlock the optimum performance not currently being delivered even by state-of-the-art procedures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-02T17:03:02Z) - In Search of Insights, Not Magic Bullets: Towards Demystification of the
Model Selection Dilemma in Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation [92.51773744318119]
This paper empirically investigates the strengths and weaknesses of different model selection criteria.
We highlight that there is a complex interplay between selection strategies, candidate estimators and the data used for comparing them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-06T16:55:37Z) - Stochastic Methods for AUC Optimization subject to AUC-based Fairness
Constraints [51.12047280149546]
A direct approach for obtaining a fair predictive model is to train the model through optimizing its prediction performance subject to fairness constraints.
We formulate the training problem of a fairness-aware machine learning model as an AUC optimization problem subject to a class of AUC-based fairness constraints.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on real-world data under different fairness metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-23T22:29:08Z) - Out-of-sample scoring and automatic selection of causal estimators [0.0]
We propose novel scoring approaches for both the CATE case and an important subset of instrumental variable problems.
We implement that in an open source package that relies on DoWhy and EconML libraries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-20T08:29:18Z) - Exploring validation metrics for offline model-based optimisation with
diffusion models [50.404829846182764]
In model-based optimisation (MBO) we are interested in using machine learning to design candidates that maximise some measure of reward with respect to a black box function called the (ground truth) oracle.
While an approximation to the ground oracle can be trained and used in place of it during model validation to measure the mean reward over generated candidates, the evaluation is approximate and vulnerable to adversarial examples.
This is encapsulated under our proposed evaluation framework which is also designed to measure extrapolation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-19T16:57:37Z) - Empirical Analysis of Model Selection for Heterogeneous Causal Effect Estimation [24.65301562548798]
We study the problem of model selection in causal inference, specifically for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation.
We conduct an empirical analysis to benchmark the surrogate model selection metrics introduced in the literature, as well as the novel ones introduced in this work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-03T16:26:06Z) - Rethinking Missing Data: Aleatoric Uncertainty-Aware Recommendation [59.500347564280204]
We propose a new Aleatoric Uncertainty-aware Recommendation (AUR) framework.
AUR consists of a new uncertainty estimator along with a normal recommender model.
As the chance of mislabeling reflects the potential of a pair, AUR makes recommendations according to the uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-22T04:32:51Z) - Error-based Knockoffs Inference for Controlled Feature Selection [49.99321384855201]
We propose an error-based knockoff inference method by integrating the knockoff features, the error-based feature importance statistics, and the stepdown procedure together.
The proposed inference procedure does not require specifying a regression model and can handle feature selection with theoretical guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-09T01:55:59Z) - On the estimation of discrete choice models to capture irrational
customer behaviors [4.683806391173103]
We show how to use partially-ranked preferences to efficiently model rational and irrational customer types from transaction data.
An extensive set of experiments assesses the predictive accuracy of the proposed approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-08T19:19:51Z) - Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit
estimators [77.34726150561087]
Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties.
We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE)
When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.