Combination of Weak Learners eXplanations to Improve Random Forest eXplicability Robustness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.19025v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:37:40 GMT
• Title: Combination of Weak Learners eXplanations to Improve Random Forest eXplicability Robustness
• Authors: Riccardo Pala and Esteban Garc\'ia-Cuesta
• Abstract summary: The notion of robustness in XAI refers to the observed variations in the explanation of the prediction of a learned model. We argue that a combination through discriminative averaging of ensembles weak learners explanations can improve the robustness of explanations in ensemble methods.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The notion of robustness in XAI refers to the observed variations in the explanation of the prediction of a learned model with respect to changes in the input leading to that prediction. Intuitively, if the input being explained is modified slightly subtly enough so as to not change the prediction of the model too much, then we would expect that the explanation provided for that new input does not change much either. We argue that a combination through discriminative averaging of ensembles weak learners explanations can improve the robustness of explanations in ensemble methods.This approach has been implemented and tested with post-hoc SHAP method and Random Forest ensemble with successful results. The improvements obtained have been measured quantitatively and some insights into the explicability robustness in ensemble methods are presented.

Related papers

• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for Gradient-based Explanations in Neural Networks [6.9060054915724]
  We propose a pipeline to ascertain the explanation uncertainty of neural networks. We use this pipeline to produce explanation distributions for the CIFAR-10, FER+, and California Housing datasets. We compute modified pixel insertion/deletion metrics to evaluate the quality of the generated explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T21:56:02Z)
• Identifying Drivers of Predictive Aleatoric Uncertainty [2.5311562666866494]
  We present a simple approach to explain predictive aleatoric uncertainties. We estimate uncertainty as predictive variance by adapting a neural network with a Gaussian output distribution. We quantify our findings with a nuanced benchmark analysis that includes real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T13:28:53Z)
• Explaining Predictive Uncertainty with Information Theoretic Shapley Values [6.49838460559032]
  We adapt the popular Shapley value framework to explain various types of predictive uncertainty. We implement efficient algorithms that perform well in a range of experiments on real and simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T07:43:46Z)
• Counterfactuals of Counterfactuals: a back-translation-inspired approach to analyse counterfactual editors [3.4253416336476246]
  We focus on the analysis of counterfactual, contrastive explanations. We propose a new back translation-inspired evaluation methodology. We show that by iteratively feeding the counterfactual to the explainer we can obtain valuable insights into the behaviour of both the predictor and the explainer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T16:04:28Z)
• Grouping Shapley Value Feature Importances of Random Forests for explainable Yield Prediction [0.8543936047647136]
  We explain the concept of Shapley values directly computed for groups of features and introduce an algorithm to compute them efficiently on tree structures. We provide a blueprint for designing swarm plots that combine many local explanations for global understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T13:03:33Z)
• Don't Explain Noise: Robust Counterfactuals for Randomized Ensembles [50.81061839052459]
  We formalize the generation of robust counterfactual explanations as a probabilistic problem. We show the link between the robustness of ensemble models and the robustness of base learners. Our method achieves high robustness with only a small increase in the distance from counterfactual explanations to their initial observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T17:28:54Z)
• Regularizing Variational Autoencoder with Diversity and Uncertainty Awareness [61.827054365139645]
  Variational Autoencoder (VAE) approximates the posterior of latent variables based on amortized variational inference. We propose an alternative model, DU-VAE, for learning a more Diverse and less Uncertain latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T07:58:13Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Learning Disentangled Representations with Latent Variation Predictability [102.4163768995288]
  This paper defines the variation predictability of latent disentangled representations. Within an adversarial generation process, we encourage variation predictability by maximizing the mutual information between latent variations and corresponding image pairs. We develop an evaluation metric that does not rely on the ground-truth generative factors to measure the disentanglement of latent representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-25T08:54:26Z)
• Efficient Ensemble Model Generation for Uncertainty Estimation with Bayesian Approximation in Segmentation [74.06904875527556]
  We propose a generic and efficient segmentation framework to construct ensemble segmentation models. In the proposed method, ensemble models can be efficiently generated by using the layer selection method. We also devise a new pixel-wise uncertainty loss, which improves the predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T16:08:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.