Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems: Automatic Dataset Creation, Evaluation and Boolean Agent Setup

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00820v1
• Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:56:17 GMT
• Title: Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems: Automatic Dataset Creation, Evaluation and Boolean Agent Setup
• Authors: Tristan Kenneweg and Philip Kenneweg and Barbara Hammer
• Abstract summary: Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have seen huge popularity in augmenting Large-Language Model (LLM) outputs with domain specific and time sensitive data. In this paper we present a rigorous dataset creation and evaluation workflow to quantitatively compare different RAG strategies.
• Score: 5.464952345664292
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have seen huge popularity in augmenting Large-Language Model (LLM) outputs with domain specific and time sensitive data. Very recently a shift is happening from simple RAG setups that query a vector database for additional information with every user input to more sophisticated forms of RAG. However, different concrete approaches compete on mostly anecdotal evidence at the moment. In this paper we present a rigorous dataset creation and evaluation workflow to quantitatively compare different RAG strategies. We use a dataset created this way for the development and evaluation of a boolean agent RAG setup: A system in which a LLM can decide whether to query a vector database or not, thus saving tokens on questions that can be answered with internal knowledge. We publish our code and generated dataset online.

Related papers

• BERGEN: A Benchmarking Library for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [26.158785168036662]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation allows to enhance Large Language Models with external knowledge. Inconsistent benchmarking poses a major challenge in comparing approaches and understanding the impact of each component in the pipeline. In this work, we study best practices that lay the groundwork for a systematic evaluation of RAG and present BERGEN, an end-to-end library for reproducible research standardizing RAG experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T09:09:27Z)
• RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a standard architectural pattern for domain-specific knowledge into user-facing chat applications. We introduce RAGBench: the first comprehensive, large-scale RAG benchmark dataset of 100k examples. We formalize the TRACe evaluation framework: a set of explainable and actionable RAG evaluation metrics applicable across all RAG domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T20:23:15Z)
• DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning Graph [70.79413606968814]
  We introduce Dynamic Evaluation of LLMs via Adaptive Reasoning Graph Evolvement (DARG) to dynamically extend current benchmarks with controlled complexity and diversity. Specifically, we first extract the reasoning graphs of data points in current benchmarks and then perturb the reasoning graphs to generate novel testing data. Such newly generated test samples can have different levels of complexity while maintaining linguistic diversity similar to the original benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T04:27:53Z)
• GenQA: Generating Millions of Instructions from a Handful of Prompts [67.54980063851605]
  Most public instruction finetuning datasets are relatively small compared to the closed source datasets used to train industry models. In this work, we study methods for generating large instruction datasets from a single prompt. Our dataset meets or exceeds both WizardLM and Ultrachat on both knowledge-intensive leaderboard tasks as well as conversational evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T17:44:08Z)
• Long-Span Question-Answering: Automatic Question Generation and QA-System Ranking via Side-by-Side Evaluation [65.16137964758612]
  We explore the use of long-context capabilities in large language models to create synthetic reading comprehension data from entire books. Our objective is to test the capabilities of LLMs to analyze, understand, and reason over problems that require a detailed comprehension of long spans of text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T20:15:10Z)
• ERATTA: Extreme RAG for Table To Answers with Large Language Models [1.3318204310917532]
  Large language models (LLMs) with retrieval augmented-generation (RAG) have been the optimal choice for scalable generative AI solutions. We propose a unique LLM-based system where multiple LLMs can be invoked to enable data authentication, user query routing, data retrieval and custom prompting. One prompt manages user-to-data authentication followed by three prompts to route, fetch data and generate a customizable prompt natural language responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T02:49:59Z)
• Blended RAG: Improving RAG (Retriever-Augmented Generation) Accuracy with Semantic Search and Hybrid Query-Based Retrievers [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a prevalent approach to infuse a private knowledge base of documents with Large Language Models (LLM) to build Generative Q&A (Question-Answering) systems. We propose the 'Blended RAG' method of leveraging semantic search techniques, such as Vector indexes and Sparse indexes, blended with hybrid query strategies. Our study achieves better retrieval results and sets new benchmarks for IR (Information Retrieval) datasets like NQ and TREC-COVID datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T17:13:46Z)
• RAGGED: Towards Informed Design of Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems [51.171355532527365]
  We introduce the RAGGED framework to analyze and optimize RAG systems. We study two classic sparse and dense retrievers, and four top-performing LMs in encoder-decoder and decoder-only architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T02:26:31Z)
• REAR: A Relevance-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Open-Domain Question Answering [122.62012375722124]
  In existing methods, large language models (LLMs) cannot precisely assess the relevance of retrieved documents. We propose REAR, a RElevance-Aware Retrieval-augmented approach for open-domain question answering (QA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T13:22:51Z)
• CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [49.16989035566899]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique that enhances the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge sources. This paper constructs a large-scale and more comprehensive benchmark, and evaluates all the components of RAG systems in various RAG application scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T14:25:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.