Bridging or Breaking: Impact of Intergroup Interactions on Religious Polarization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11895v3
• Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 05:38:20 GMT
• Title: Bridging or Breaking: Impact of Intergroup Interactions on Religious Polarization
• Authors: Rochana Chaturvedi, Sugat Chaturvedi and Elena Zheleva
• Abstract summary: We examine whether intergroup interactions around important events affect polarization between majority and minority groups in social networks. We use data on the religious identity of nearly 700,000 Indian Twitter users engaging in COVID-19-related discourse during 2020. We find that for political and social events, intergroup interactions reduce polarization. This decline is weaker for individuals at the extreme who already exhibit high conformity to their group. In contrast, during communal events, intergroup interactions can increase group conformity.
• Score: 10.640364016644883
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While exposure to diverse viewpoints may reduce polarization, it can also have a backfire effect and exacerbate polarization when the discussion is adversarial. Here, we examine the question whether intergroup interactions around important events affect polarization between majority and minority groups in social networks. We compile data on the religious identity of nearly 700,000 Indian Twitter users engaging in COVID-19-related discourse during 2020. We introduce a new measure for an individual's group conformity based on contextualized embeddings of tweet text, which helps us assess polarization between religious groups. We then use a meta-learning framework to examine heterogeneous treatment effects of intergroup interactions on an individual's group conformity in the light of communal, political, and socio-economic events. We find that for political and social events, intergroup interactions reduce polarization. This decline is weaker for individuals at the extreme who already exhibit high conformity to their group. In contrast, during communal events, intergroup interactions can increase group conformity. Finally, we decompose the differential effects across religious groups in terms of emotions and topics of discussion. The results show that the dynamics of religious polarization are sensitive to the context and have important implications for understanding the role of intergroup interactions.

Related papers

• Greater than the sum of its parts: The role of minority and majority status in collaborative problem-solving communication [0.0]
  Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) is a vital skill used both in the workplace and in educational environments. Women and underrepresented minorities (URMs) often face obstacles during collaborative interactions that hinder their key participation in these problem-solving conversations. Here, we explored the communication patterns of minority and non-minority individuals working together in a CPS task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T17:17:20Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Evidence of Demographic rather than Ideological Segregation in News Discussion on Reddit [9.875731068651561]
  We evaluate homophily and heterophily among ideological and demographic groups in a typical opinion formation context. We analyze user interactions across five years in the r/news community on Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T11:37:12Z)
• Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
  We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
• Dimensions of Interpersonal Dynamics in Text: Group Membership and Fine-grained Interpersonal Emotion [27.125210491924243]
  This work aims to re-align the study of bias in NLP away from specific instances of bias to one which encapsulates the relationship between speaker, text, target and social dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-14T14:46:55Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
• Towards Group Robustness in the presence of Partial Group Labels [61.33713547766866]
  spurious correlations between input samples and the target labels wrongly direct the neural network predictions. We propose an algorithm that optimize for the worst-off group assignments from a constraint set. We show improvements in the minority group's performance while preserving overall aggregate accuracy across groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T22:04:48Z)
• SSAGCN: Social Soft Attention Graph Convolution Network for Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction [59.064925464991056]
  We propose one new prediction model named Social Soft Attention Graph Convolution Network (SSAGCN) SSAGCN aims to simultaneously handle social interactions among pedestrians and scene interactions between pedestrians and environments. Experiments on public available datasets prove the effectiveness of SSAGCN and have achieved state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-05T01:49:18Z)
• Perspective-taking to Reduce Affective Polarization on Social Media [11.379010432760241]
  We deploy a randomized field experiment through a browser extension to 1,611 participants on Twitter. We find that simply exposing participants to "outgroup" feeds enhances engagement, but not an understanding of why others hold their political views. framing the experience in familiar, empathic terms by prompting participants to recall a disagreement does not affect engagement, but does increase their ability to understand opposing views.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T20:25:10Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• Towards control of opinion diversity by introducing zealots into a polarised social group [7.9603223299524535]
  We explore a method to influence or even control the diversity of opinions within a polarised social group. We leverage the voter model in which users hold binary opinions and repeatedly update their beliefs based on others they connect with. We inject zealots into a polarised network in order to shift the average opinion towards any target value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T15:27:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.