Cramming Contextual Bandits for On-policy Statistical Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07031v2
• Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 03:43:54 GMT
• Title: Cramming Contextual Bandits for On-policy Statistical Evaluation
• Authors: Zeyang Jia, Kosuke Imai, Michael Lingzhi Li,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the cram method as a general statistical framework for evaluating the final learned policy from a contextual bandit algorithm.<n>Cramming utilizes an entire bandit sequence through a single pass of data, leading to both statistically and computationally efficient evaluation.
• Score: 0.8192907805418583
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce the cram method as a general statistical framework for evaluating the final learned policy from a multi-armed contextual bandit algorithm, using the dataset generated by the same bandit algorithm. The proposed on-policy evaluation methodology differs from most existing methods that focus on off-policy performance evaluation of contextual bandit algorithms. Cramming utilizes an entire bandit sequence through a single pass of data, leading to both statistically and computationally efficient evaluation. We prove that if a bandit algorithm satisfies a certain stability condition, the resulting crammed evaluation estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal under mild regularity conditions. Furthermore, we show that this stability condition holds for commonly used linear contextual bandit algorithms, including epsilon-greedy, Thompson Sampling, and Upper Confidence Bound algorithms. Using both synthetic and publicly available datasets, we compare the empirical performance of cramming with the state-of-the-art methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed cram method reduces the evaluation standard error by approximately 40% relative to off-policy evaluation methods while preserving unbiasedness and valid confidence interval coverage.

Related papers

• Achieving $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ Regret in Average-Reward POMDPs with Known Observation Models [56.92178753201331]
  We tackle average-reward infinite-horizon POMDPs with an unknown transition model. We present a novel and simple estimator that overcomes this barrier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T22:29:41Z)
• Regret Minimization and Statistical Inference in Online Decision Making with High-dimensional Covariates [7.21848268647674]
  We integrate the $varepsilon$-greedy bandit algorithm for decision-making with a hard thresholding algorithm for estimating sparse bandit parameters. Under a margin condition, our method achieves either $O(T1/2)$ regret or classical $O(T1/2)$-consistent inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-10T01:47:11Z)
• Unlearning with Control: Assessing Real-world Utility for Large Language Model Unlearning [97.2995389188179]
  Recent research has begun to approach large language models (LLMs) unlearning via gradient ascent (GA) Despite their simplicity and efficiency, we suggest that GA-based methods face the propensity towards excessive unlearning. We propose several controlling methods that can regulate the extent of excessive unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• $K$-Nearest-Neighbor Resampling for Off-Policy Evaluation in Stochastic Control [0.6906005491572401]
  We propose a novel $K$-nearest neighbor reparametric procedure for estimating the performance of a policy from historical data. Our analysis allows for the sampling of entire episodes, as is common practice in most applications. Compared to other OPE methods, our algorithm does not require optimization, can be efficiently implemented via tree-based nearest neighbor search and parallelization, and does not explicitly assume a parametric model for the environment's dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T23:55:12Z)
• Real-Time Evaluation in Online Continual Learning: A New Hope [104.53052316526546]
  We evaluate current Continual Learning (CL) methods with respect to their computational costs. A simple baseline outperforms state-of-the-art CL methods under this evaluation. This surprisingly suggests that the majority of existing CL literature is tailored to a specific class of streams that is not practical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T12:21:10Z)
• Algorithms that Approximate Data Removal: New Results and Limitations [2.6905021039717987]
  We study the problem of deleting user data from machine learning models trained using empirical risk minimization. We develop an online unlearning algorithm that is both computationally and memory efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-25T17:20:33Z)
• Conformal Off-Policy Prediction in Contextual Bandits [54.67508891852636]
  Conformal off-policy prediction can output reliable predictive intervals for the outcome under a new target policy. We provide theoretical finite-sample guarantees without making any additional assumptions beyond the standard contextual bandit setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T10:39:33Z)
• Adaptive Sampling for Heterogeneous Rank Aggregation from Noisy Pairwise Comparisons [85.5955376526419]
  In rank aggregation problems, users exhibit various accuracy levels when comparing pairs of items. We propose an elimination-based active sampling strategy, which estimates the ranking of items via noisy pairwise comparisons. We prove that our algorithm can return the true ranking of items with high probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T13:51:55Z)
• A Boosting Approach to Reinforcement Learning [59.46285581748018]
  We study efficient algorithms for reinforcement learning in decision processes whose complexity is independent of the number of states. We give an efficient algorithm that is capable of improving the accuracy of such weak learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-22T16:00:45Z)
• Estimating leverage scores via rank revealing methods and randomization [50.591267188664666]
  We study algorithms for estimating the statistical leverage scores of rectangular dense or sparse matrices of arbitrary rank. Our approach is based on combining rank revealing methods with compositions of dense and sparse randomized dimensionality reduction transforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-23T19:21:55Z)
• Scalable Personalised Item Ranking through Parametric Density Estimation [53.44830012414444]
  Learning from implicit feedback is challenging because of the difficult nature of the one-class problem. Most conventional methods use a pairwise ranking approach and negative samplers to cope with the one-class problem. We propose a learning-to-rank approach, which achieves convergence speed comparable to the pointwise counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-11T03:38:16Z)
• Meta-Regularization: An Approach to Adaptive Choice of the Learning Rate in Gradient Descent [20.47598828422897]
  We propose textit-Meta-Regularization, a novel approach for the adaptive choice of the learning rate in first-order descent methods. Our approach modifies the objective function by adding a regularization term, and casts the joint process parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T13:13:34Z)
• DEALIO: Data-Efficient Adversarial Learning for Imitation from Observation [57.358212277226315]
  In imitation learning from observation IfO, a learning agent seeks to imitate a demonstrating agent using only observations of the demonstrated behavior without access to the control signals generated by the demonstrator. Recent methods based on adversarial imitation learning have led to state-of-the-art performance on IfO problems, but they typically suffer from high sample complexity due to a reliance on data-inefficient, model-free reinforcement learning algorithms. This issue makes them impractical to deploy in real-world settings, where gathering samples can incur high costs in terms of time, energy, and risk. We propose a more data-efficient IfO algorithm
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T23:46:32Z)
• Sparse PCA: Algorithms, Adversarial Perturbations and Certificates [9.348107805982604]
  We study efficient algorithms for Sparse PCA in standard statistical models. Our goal is to achieve optimal recovery guarantees while being resilient to small perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-12T18:58:51Z)
• Off-Policy Evaluation of Bandit Algorithm from Dependent Samples under Batch Update Policy [8.807587076209566]
  The goal of off-policy evaluation (OPE) is to evaluate a new policy using historical data obtained via a behavior policy. Because the contextual bandit updates the policy based on past observations, the samples are not independent and identically distributed. This paper tackles this problem by constructing an estimator from a martingale difference sequence (MDS) for the dependent samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T15:22:57Z)
• CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval Estimation [107.86876722777535]
  We study high-confidence behavior-agnostic off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning. We show in a variety of benchmarks that the confidence interval estimates are tighter and more accurate than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T12:39:11Z)
• Effective Proximal Methods for Non-convex Non-smooth Regularized Learning [27.775096437736973]
  We show that the independent sampling scheme tends to improve performance of the commonly-used uniform sampling scheme. Our new analysis also derives a speed for the sampling than best one available so far.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T16:41:32Z)
• Confidence Interval for Off-Policy Evaluation from Dependent Samples via Bandit Algorithm: Approach from Standardized Martingales [8.807587076209566]
  The goal of OPE is to evaluate a new policy using historical data obtained from behavior policies generated by the bandit algorithm. Because the bandit algorithm updates the policy based on past observations, the samples are not independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) Several existing methods for OPE do not take this issue into account and are based on the assumption that samples are i.i.d.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T07:48:04Z)
• Meta-learning with Stochastic Linear Bandits [120.43000970418939]
  We consider a class of bandit algorithms that implement a regularized version of the well-known OFUL algorithm, where the regularization is a square euclidean distance to a bias vector. We show both theoretically and experimentally, that when the number of tasks grows and the variance of the task-distribution is small, our strategies have a significant advantage over learning the tasks in isolation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T08:41:39Z)
• Stacked Generalizations in Imbalanced Fraud Data Sets using Resampling Methods [2.741266294612776]
  This study uses stacked generalization, which is a two-step process of combining machine learning methods, called meta or super learners, for improving the performance of algorithms. Building a test harness that accounts for all permutations of algorithm sample set pairs demonstrates that the complex, intrinsic data structures are all thoroughly tested.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-03T20:38:22Z)
• Is Temporal Difference Learning Optimal? An Instance-Dependent Analysis [102.29671176698373]
  We address the problem of policy evaluation in discounted decision processes, and provide Markov-dependent guarantees on the $ell_infty$error under a generative model. We establish both and non-asymptotic versions of local minimax lower bounds for policy evaluation, thereby providing an instance-dependent baseline by which to compare algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-16T17:15:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.