Hyperparameters in Continual Learning: A Reality Check

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09066v3
• Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 22:44:23 GMT
• Title: Hyperparameters in Continual Learning: A Reality Check
• Authors: Sungmin Cha, Kyunghyun Cho,
• Abstract summary: Continual learning (CL) aims to train a model on a sequence of tasks while balancing the trade-off between plasticity (learning new tasks) and stability (retaining prior knowledge) The dominantly adopted conventional evaluation protocol for CL algorithms selects the best hyper parameters in a given scenario and then evaluates the algorithms in the same scenario. This protocol has significant shortcomings: it overestimates the CL capacity of algorithms and relies on unrealistic hyper parameter tuning. We argue that the evaluation of CL algorithms should focus on assessing the generalizability of their CL capacity to unseen scenarios.
• Score: 53.30082523545212
• License:
• Abstract: Continual learning (CL) aims to train a model on a sequence of tasks (i.e., a CL scenario) while balancing the trade-off between plasticity (learning new tasks) and stability (retaining prior knowledge). The dominantly adopted conventional evaluation protocol for CL algorithms selects the best hyperparameters within a given scenario and then evaluates the algorithms using these hyperparameters in the same scenario. However, this protocol has significant shortcomings: it overestimates the CL capacity of algorithms and relies on unrealistic hyperparameter tuning, which is not feasible for real-world applications. From the fundamental principles of evaluation in machine learning, we argue that the evaluation of CL algorithms should focus on assessing the generalizability of their CL capacity to unseen scenarios. Based on this, we propose a revised two-phase evaluation protocol consisting of a hyperparameter tuning phase and an evaluation phase. Both phases share the same scenario configuration (e.g., number of tasks) but are generated from different datasets. Hyperparameters of CL algorithms are tuned in the first phase and applied in the second phase to evaluate the algorithms. We apply this protocol to class-incremental learning, both with and without pretrained models. Across more than 8,000 experiments, our results show that most state-of-the-art algorithms fail to replicate their reported performance, highlighting that their CL capacity has been significantly overestimated in the conventional evaluation protocol.

Related papers

• ICL-TSVD: Bridging Theory and Practice in Continual Learning with Pre-trained Models [103.45785408116146]
  Continual learning (CL) aims to train a model that can solve multiple tasks presented sequentially. Recent CL approaches have achieved strong performance by leveraging large pre-trained models that generalize well to downstream tasks. However, such methods lack theoretical guarantees, making them prone to unexpected failures. We bridge this gap by integrating an empirically strong approach into a principled framework, designed to prevent forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T12:58:37Z)
• CLAP4CLIP: Continual Learning with Probabilistic Finetuning for Vision-Language Models [23.398619576886375]
  Continual learning (CL) aims to help deep neural networks learn new knowledge while retaining what has been learned. Our work proposes Continual LeArning with Probabilistic finetuning (CLAP) - a probabilistic modeling framework over visual-guided text features per task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T04:15:58Z)
• Optimizing Hyperparameters with Conformal Quantile Regression [7.316604052864345]
  We propose to leverage conformalized quantile regression which makes minimal assumptions about the observation noise. This translates to quicker HPO convergence on empirical benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T15:33:39Z)
• Computationally Budgeted Continual Learning: What Does Matter? [128.0827987414154]
  Continual Learning (CL) aims to sequentially train models on streams of incoming data that vary in distribution by preserving previous knowledge while adapting to new data. Current CL literature focuses on restricted access to previously seen data, while imposing no constraints on the computational budget for training. We revisit this problem with a large-scale benchmark and analyze the performance of traditional CL approaches in a compute-constrained setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T14:50:27Z)
• From MNIST to ImageNet and Back: Benchmarking Continual Curriculum Learning [9.104068727716294]
  Continual learning (CL) is one of the most promising trends in machine learning research. We introduce two novel CL benchmarks that involve multiple heterogeneous tasks from six image datasets. We additionally structure our benchmarks so that tasks are presented in increasing and decreasing order of complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T18:11:19Z)
• Real-Time Evaluation in Online Continual Learning: A New Hope [104.53052316526546]
  We evaluate current Continual Learning (CL) methods with respect to their computational costs. A simple baseline outperforms state-of-the-art CL methods under this evaluation. This surprisingly suggests that the majority of existing CL literature is tailored to a specific class of streams that is not practical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T12:21:10Z)
• Do Pre-trained Models Benefit Equally in Continual Learning? [25.959813589169176]
  Existing work on continual learning (CL) is primarily devoted to developing algorithms for models trained from scratch. Despite their encouraging performance on contrived benchmarks, these algorithms show dramatic performance drops in real-world scenarios. This paper advocates the systematic introduction of pre-training to CL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T18:03:37Z)
• Actor-Critic based Improper Reinforcement Learning [61.430513757337486]
  We consider an improper reinforcement learning setting where a learner is given $M$ base controllers for an unknown Markov decision process. We propose two algorithms: (1) a Policy Gradient-based approach; and (2) an algorithm that can switch between a simple Actor-Critic scheme and a Natural Actor-Critic scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T05:55:02Z)
• Using Representation Expressiveness and Learnability to Evaluate Self-Supervised Learning Methods [61.49061000562676]
  We introduce Cluster Learnability (CL) to assess learnability. CL is measured in terms of the performance of a KNN trained to predict labels obtained by clustering the representations with K-means. We find that CL better correlates with in-distribution model performance than other competing recent evaluation schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-02T19:05:13Z)
• Continual Learning for Recurrent Neural Networks: a Review and Empirical Evaluation [12.27992745065497]
  Continual Learning with recurrent neural networks could pave the way to a large number of applications where incoming data is non stationary. We organize the literature on CL for sequential data processing by providing a categorization of the contributions and a review of the benchmarks. We propose two new benchmarks for CL with sequential data based on existing datasets, whose characteristics resemble real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T19:25:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.