Scenarios for the Transition to AGI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12107v1
• Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:22:28 GMT
• Title: Scenarios for the Transition to AGI
• Authors: Anton Korinek, Donghyun Suh,
• Abstract summary: We analyze how output and wages behave under different scenarios for technological progress. We assume that human work can be decomposed into atomistic tasks that differ in their complexity.
• Score: 0.24664305327044286
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We analyze how output and wages behave under different scenarios for technological progress that may culminate in Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), defined as the ability of AI systems to perform all tasks that humans can perform. We assume that human work can be decomposed into atomistic tasks that differ in their complexity. Advances in technology make ever more complex tasks amenable to automation. The effects on wages depend on a race between automation and capital accumulation. If the distribution of task complexity exhibits a sufficiently thick infinite tail, then there is always enough work for humans, and wages may rise forever. By contrast, if the complexity of tasks that humans can perform is bounded and full automation is reached, then wages collapse. But declines may occur even before if large-scale automation outpaces capital accumulation and makes labor too abundant. Automating productivity growth may lead to broad-based gains in the returns to all factors. By contrast, bottlenecks to growth from irreproducible scarce factors may exacerbate the decline in wages.

Related papers

• $π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control [77.32743739202543]
  We propose a novel flow matching architecture built on top of a pre-trained vision-language model (VLM) to inherit Internet-scale semantic knowledge. We evaluate our model in terms of its ability to perform tasks in zero shot after pre-training, follow language instructions from people, and its ability to acquire new skills via fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T17:22:30Z)
• COHERENT: Collaboration of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot System with Large Language Models [49.24666980374751]
  COHERENT is a novel LLM-based task planning framework for collaboration of heterogeneous multi-robot systems. A Proposal-Execution-Feedback-Adjustment mechanism is designed to decompose and assign actions for individual robots. The experimental results show that our work surpasses the previous methods by a large margin in terms of success rate and execution efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T15:53:41Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences. First, it is not sustainable, as its compute demands increase faster than model performance, leading to unreasonable economic requirements and a disproportionate environmental footprint. Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Towards the Terminator Economy: Assessing Job Exposure to AI through LLMs [10.844598404826355]
  One-third of U.S. employment is highly exposed to AI, primarily in high-skill jobs. This exposure correlates positively with employment and wage growth from 2019 to 2023.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-27T08:14:18Z)
• The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
  Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)
• Human Decision Makings on Curriculum Reinforcement Learning with Difficulty Adjustment [52.07473934146584]
  We guide the curriculum reinforcement learning results towards a preferred performance level that is neither too hard nor too easy via learning from the human decision process. Our system is highly parallelizable, making it possible for a human to train large-scale reinforcement learning applications. It shows reinforcement learning performance can successfully adjust in sync with the human desired difficulty level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-04T23:53:51Z)
• The Turing Trap: The Promise & Peril of Human-Like Artificial Intelligence [1.9143819780453073]
  The benefits of human-like artificial intelligence include soaring productivity, increased leisure, and perhaps most profoundly, a better understanding of our own minds. But not all types of AI are human-like. In fact, many of the most powerful systems are very different from humans. As machines become better substitutes for human labor, workers lose economic and political bargaining power. In contrast, when AI is focused on augmenting humans rather than mimicking them, then humans retain the power to insist on a share of the value created.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T21:07:17Z)
• Lifelong Robotic Reinforcement Learning by Retaining Experiences [61.79346922421323]
  Many multi-task reinforcement learning efforts assume the robot can collect data from all tasks at all times. In this work, we study a practical sequential multi-task RL problem motivated by the practical constraints of physical robotic systems. We derive an approach that effectively leverages the data and policies learned for previous tasks to cumulatively grow the robot's skill-set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-19T18:00:51Z)
• AI and Shared Prosperity [0.0]
  Future advances in AI that automate away human labor may have stark implications for labor markets and inequality. This paper proposes a framework to analyze the effects of specific types of AI systems on the labor market, based on how much labor demand they will create versus displace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-18T12:37:18Z)
• Hybrid Intelligence [4.508830262248694]
  We argue that the most likely paradigm for the division of labor between humans and machines in the next decades is Hybrid Intelligence. This concept aims at using the complementary strengths of human intelligence and AI, so that they can perform better than each of the two could separately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T08:56:09Z)
• Do's and Don'ts for Human and Digital Worker Integration [14.624340432672172]
  We argue for a broader view that incorporates the potential for multiple levels of autonomy and human involvement. We argue for a wider range of metrics beyond productivity when integrating digital workers into a business process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T13:30:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.