Towards Lifecycle Unlearning Commitment Management: Measuring Sample-level Approximate Unlearning Completeness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12830v2
• Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 23:20:41 GMT
• Title: Towards Lifecycle Unlearning Commitment Management: Measuring Sample-level Approximate Unlearning Completeness
• Authors: Cheng-Long Wang, Qi Li, Zihang Xiang, Yinzhi Cao, Di Wang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the task of Lifecycle Unlearning Commitment Management (LUCM) for approximate unlearning. We propose an efficient metric designed to assess the sample-level unlearning completeness. We show that this metric is able to serve as a tool for monitoring unlearning anomalies throughout the unlearning lifecycle.
• Score: 30.596695293390415
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: By adopting a more flexible definition of unlearning and adjusting the model distribution to simulate training without the targeted data, approximate machine unlearning provides a less resource-demanding alternative to the more laborious exact unlearning methods. Yet, the unlearning completeness of target samples-even when the approximate algorithms are executed faithfully without external threats-remains largely unexamined, raising questions about those approximate algorithms' ability to fulfill their commitment of unlearning during the lifecycle. In this paper, we introduce the task of Lifecycle Unlearning Commitment Management (LUCM) for approximate unlearning and outline its primary challenges. We propose an efficient metric designed to assess the sample-level unlearning completeness. Our empirical results demonstrate its superiority over membership inference techniques in two key areas: the strong correlation of its measurements with unlearning completeness across various unlearning tasks, and its computational efficiency, making it suitable for real-time applications. Additionally, we show that this metric is able to serve as a tool for monitoring unlearning anomalies throughout the unlearning lifecycle, including both under-unlearning and over-unlearning. We apply this metric to evaluate the unlearning commitments of current approximate algorithms. Our analysis, conducted across multiple unlearning benchmarks, reveals that these algorithms inconsistently fulfill their unlearning commitments due to two main issues: 1) unlearning new data can significantly affect the unlearning utility of previously requested data, and 2) approximate algorithms fail to ensure equitable unlearning utility across different groups. These insights emphasize the crucial importance of LUCM throughout the unlearning lifecycle. We will soon open-source our newly developed benchmark.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Vision Language Model Unlearning via Fictitious Facial Identity Dataset [94.13848736705575]
  We introduce Facial Identity Unlearning Benchmark (FIUBench), a novel VLM unlearning benchmark designed to robustly evaluate the effectiveness of unlearning algorithms. We apply a two-stage evaluation pipeline that is designed to precisely control the sources of information and their exposure levels. Through the evaluation of four baseline VLM unlearning algorithms within FIUBench, we find that all methods remain limited in their unlearning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T23:26:10Z)
• Towards Understanding the Feasibility of Machine Unlearning [14.177012256360635]
  We present a set of novel metrics for quantifying the difficulty of unlearning. Specifically, we propose several metrics to assess the conditions necessary for a successful unlearning operation. We also present a ranking mechanism to identify the most challenging samples to unlearn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T23:41:42Z)
• Unlearning with Control: Assessing Real-world Utility for Large Language Model Unlearning [97.2995389188179]
  Recent research has begun to approach large language models (LLMs) unlearning via gradient ascent (GA) Despite their simplicity and efficiency, we suggest that GA-based methods face the propensity towards excessive unlearning. We propose several controlling methods that can regulate the extent of excessive unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• Continual Learning of Numerous Tasks from Long-tail Distributions [17.706669222987273]
  Continual learning focuses on developing models that learn and adapt to new tasks while retaining previously acquired knowledge. Existing continual learning algorithms usually involve a small number of tasks with uniform sizes and may not accurately represent real-world learning scenarios. We propose a method that reuses the states in Adam by maintaining a weighted average of the second moments from previous tasks. We demonstrate that our method, compatible with most existing continual learning algorithms, effectively reduces forgetting with only a small amount of additional computational or memory costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T13:56:33Z)
• Data-CUBE: Data Curriculum for Instruction-based Sentence Representation Learning [85.66907881270785]
  We propose a data curriculum method, namely Data-CUBE, that arranges the orders of all the multi-task data for training. In the task level, we aim to find the optimal task order to minimize the total cross-task interference risk. In the instance level, we measure the difficulty of all instances per task, then divide them into the easy-to-difficult mini-batches for training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-07T18:12:20Z)
• Resilient Constrained Learning [94.27081585149836]
  This paper presents a constrained learning approach that adapts the requirements while simultaneously solving the learning task. We call this approach resilient constrained learning after the term used to describe ecological systems that adapt to disruptions by modifying their operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T18:14:18Z)
• Offline Robot Reinforcement Learning with Uncertainty-Guided Human Expert Sampling [11.751910133386254]
  Recent advances in batch (offline) reinforcement learning have shown promising results in learning from available offline data. We propose a novel approach that uses uncertainty estimation to trigger the injection of human demonstration data. Our experiments show that this approach is more sample efficient when compared to a naive way of combining expert data with data collected from a sub-optimal agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-16T01:41:59Z)
• Learning Centric Wireless Resource Allocation for Edge Computing: Algorithm and Experiment [15.577056429740951]
  Edge intelligence is an emerging network architecture that integrates sensing, communication, computing components, and supports various machine learning applications. Existing methods ignore two important facts: 1) different models have heterogeneous demands on training data; 2) there is a mismatch between the simulated environment and the real-world environment. This paper proposes the learning centric wireless resource allocation scheme that maximizes the worst learning performance of multiple tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-29T06:20:40Z)
• Provable Meta-Learning of Linear Representations [114.656572506859]
  We provide fast, sample-efficient algorithms to address the dual challenges of learning a common set of features from multiple, related tasks, and transferring this knowledge to new, unseen tasks. We also provide information-theoretic lower bounds on the sample complexity of learning these linear features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T18:21:34Z)
• Scalable Multi-Task Imitation Learning with Autonomous Improvement [159.9406205002599]
  We build an imitation learning system that can continuously improve through autonomous data collection. We leverage the robot's own trials as demonstrations for tasks other than the one that the robot actually attempted. In contrast to prior imitation learning approaches, our method can autonomously collect data with sparse supervision for continuous improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T18:56:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.