Learning Decomposable and Debiased Representations via Attribute-Centric Information Bottlenecks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14140v1
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 05:33:49 GMT
- Title: Learning Decomposable and Debiased Representations via Attribute-Centric Information Bottlenecks
- Authors: Jinyung Hong, Eun Som Jeon, Changhoon Kim, Keun Hee Park, Utkarsh Nath, Yezhou Yang, Pavan Turaga, Theodore P. Pavlic,
- Abstract summary: Biased attributes, spuriously correlated with target labels in a dataset, can problematically lead to neural networks that learn improper shortcuts for classifications.
We propose a novel debiasing framework, Debiasing Global Workspace, introducing attention-based information bottlenecks for learning compositional representations of attributes.
We conduct comprehensive evaluations on biased datasets, along with both quantitative and qualitative analyses, to showcase our approach's efficacy.
- Score: 21.813755593742858
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Biased attributes, spuriously correlated with target labels in a dataset, can problematically lead to neural networks that learn improper shortcuts for classifications and limit their capabilities for out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization. Although many debiasing approaches have been proposed to ensure correct predictions from biased datasets, few studies have considered learning latent embedding consisting of intrinsic and biased attributes that contribute to improved performance and explain how the model pays attention to attributes. In this paper, we propose a novel debiasing framework, Debiasing Global Workspace, introducing attention-based information bottlenecks for learning compositional representations of attributes without defining specific bias types. Based on our observation that learning shape-centric representation helps robust performance on OOD datasets, we adopt those abilities to learn robust and generalizable representations of decomposable latent embeddings corresponding to intrinsic and biasing attributes. We conduct comprehensive evaluations on biased datasets, along with both quantitative and qualitative analyses, to showcase our approach's efficacy in attribute-centric representation learning and its ability to differentiate between intrinsic and bias-related features.
Related papers
- Prospector Heads: Generalized Feature Attribution for Large Models & Data [82.02696069543454]
We introduce prospector heads, an efficient and interpretable alternative to explanation-based attribution methods.
We demonstrate how prospector heads enable improved interpretation and discovery of class-specific patterns in input data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T23:01:28Z) - Causality and Independence Enhancement for Biased Node Classification [56.38828085943763]
We propose a novel Causality and Independence Enhancement (CIE) framework, applicable to various graph neural networks (GNNs)
Our approach estimates causal and spurious features at the node representation level and mitigates the influence of spurious correlations.
Our approach CIE not only significantly enhances the performance of GNNs but outperforms state-of-the-art debiased node classification methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-14T13:56:24Z) - Model Debiasing via Gradient-based Explanation on Representation [14.673988027271388]
We propose a novel fairness framework that performs debiasing with regard to sensitive attributes and proxy attributes.
Our framework achieves better fairness-accuracy trade-off on unstructured and structured datasets than previous state-of-the-art approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-20T11:57:57Z) - Semi-FairVAE: Semi-supervised Fair Representation Learning with
Adversarial Variational Autoencoder [92.67156911466397]
We propose a semi-supervised fair representation learning approach based on adversarial variational autoencoder.
We use a bias-aware model to capture inherent bias information on sensitive attribute.
We also use a bias-free model to learn debiased fair representations by using adversarial learning to remove bias information from them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-01T15:57:47Z) - General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space.
GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z) - Visual Recognition with Deep Learning from Biased Image Datasets [6.10183951877597]
We show how biasing models can be applied to remedy problems in the context of visual recognition.
Based on the (approximate) knowledge of the biasing mechanisms at work, our approach consists in reweighting the observations.
We propose to use a low dimensional image representation, shared across the image databases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-06T10:56:58Z) - Learning Bias-Invariant Representation by Cross-Sample Mutual
Information Minimization [77.8735802150511]
We propose a cross-sample adversarial debiasing (CSAD) method to remove the bias information misused by the target task.
The correlation measurement plays a critical role in adversarial debiasing and is conducted by a cross-sample neural mutual information estimator.
We conduct thorough experiments on publicly available datasets to validate the advantages of the proposed method over state-of-the-art approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-11T21:17:02Z) - Regularizing Models via Pointwise Mutual Information for Named Entity
Recognition [17.767466724342064]
We propose a Pointwise Mutual Information (PMI) to enhance generalization ability while outperforming an in-domain performance.
Our approach enables to debias highly correlated word and labels in the benchmark datasets.
For long-named and complex-structure entities, our method can predict these entities through debiasing on conjunction or special characters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-15T05:47:27Z) - Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
We consider fairness in the integration component of data management.
We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.