Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: Principles and Practice

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18539v2
• Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 10:07:21 GMT
• Title: Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: Principles and Practice
• Authors: Taku Yamagata, Raul Santos-Rodriguez,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning has shown remarkable success in solving relatively complex tasks. The deployment of RL systems in real-world scenarios poses significant challenges related to safety and robustness. This paper explores the main dimensions of the safe and robust RL landscape, encompassing algorithmic, ethical, and practical considerations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has shown remarkable success in solving relatively complex tasks, yet the deployment of RL systems in real-world scenarios poses significant challenges related to safety and robustness. This paper aims to identify and further understand those challenges thorough the exploration of the main dimensions of the safe and robust RL landscape, encompassing algorithmic, ethical, and practical considerations. We conduct a comprehensive review of methodologies and open problems that summarizes the efforts in recent years to address the inherent risks associated with RL applications. After discussing and proposing definitions for both safe and robust RL, the paper categorizes existing research works into different algorithmic approaches that enhance the safety and robustness of RL agents. We examine techniques such as uncertainty estimation, optimisation methodologies, exploration-exploitation trade-offs, and adversarial training. Environmental factors, including sim-to-real transfer and domain adaptation, are also scrutinized to understand how RL systems can adapt to diverse and dynamic surroundings. Moreover, human involvement is an integral ingredient of the analysis, acknowledging the broad set of roles that humans can take in this context. Importantly, to aid practitioners in navigating the complexities of safe and robust RL implementation, this paper introduces a practical checklist derived from the synthesized literature. The checklist encompasses critical aspects of algorithm design, training environment considerations, and ethical guidelines. It will serve as a resource for developers and policymakers alike to ensure the responsible deployment of RL systems in many application domains.

Related papers

• Towards Sample-Efficiency and Generalization of Transfer and Inverse Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Literature Review [50.67937325077047]
  This paper is devoted to a comprehensive review of realizing the sample efficiency and generalization of RL algorithms through transfer and inverse reinforcement learning (T-IRL) Our findings denote that a majority of recent research works have dealt with the aforementioned challenges by utilizing human-in-the-loop and sim-to-real strategies. Under the IRL structure, training schemes that require a low number of experience transitions and extension of such frameworks to multi-agent and multi-intention problems have been the priority of researchers in recent years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T15:18:57Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Inverse Constrained Reinforcement Learning: Definitions, Progress and Challenges [27.681999552782372]
  Inverse Constrained Reinforcement Learning (ICRL) is the task of inferring the implicit constraints followed by expert agents from their demonstration data. This article presents a categorical survey of the latest advances in ICRL. It serves as a comprehensive reference for machine learning researchers and practitioners, as well as starters seeking to comprehend the definitions, advancements, and important challenges in ICRL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T18:49:03Z)
• Analyzing Adversarial Inputs in Deep Reinforcement Learning [53.3760591018817]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of the characterization of adversarial inputs, through the lens of formal verification. We introduce a novel metric, the Adversarial Rate, to classify models based on their susceptibility to such perturbations. Our analysis empirically demonstrates how adversarial inputs can affect the safety of a given DRL system with respect to such perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T21:58:40Z)
• A Survey of Constraint Formulations in Safe Reinforcement Learning [15.593999581562203]
  Safety is critical when applying reinforcement learning to real-world problems. A prevalent safe RL approach is based on a constrained criterion, which seeks to maximize the expected cumulative reward. Despite recent effort to enhance safety in RL, a systematic understanding of the field remains difficult.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T04:40:31Z)
• Gradient Shaping for Multi-Constraint Safe Reinforcement Learning [31.297400160104853]
  Online safe reinforcement learning (RL) involves training a policy that maximizes task efficiency while satisfying constraints via interacting with the environments. We propose a unified framework designed for MC safe RL algorithms. We introduce the Gradient Shaping (GradS) method for general Lagrangian-based safe RL algorithms to improve the training efficiency in terms of both reward and constraint satisfaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-23T00:55:09Z)
• Modeling Risk in Reinforcement Learning: A Literature Mapping [0.0]
  We perform a systematic literature mapping with the objective to characterize risk in safe RL. Based on the obtained results, we present definitions, characteristics, and types of risk that hold on multiple application domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T18:26:08Z)
• Provably Efficient Iterated CVaR Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation and Human Feedback [57.6775169085215]
  Risk-sensitive reinforcement learning aims to optimize policies that balance the expected reward and risk. We present a novel framework that employs an Iterated Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective under both linear and general function approximations. We propose provably sample-efficient algorithms for this Iterated CVaR RL and provide rigorous theoretical analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T08:14:54Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Robotics via Scenario-Based Programming [64.07167316957533]
  It is crucial to optimize the performance of DRL-based agents while providing guarantees about their behavior. This paper presents a novel technique for incorporating domain-expert knowledge into a constrained DRL training loop. Our experiments demonstrate that using our approach to leverage expert knowledge dramatically improves the safety and the performance of the agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T07:19:38Z)
• Policy Information Capacity: Information-Theoretic Measure for Task Complexity in Deep Reinforcement Learning [83.66080019570461]
  We propose two environment-agnostic, algorithm-agnostic quantitative metrics for task difficulty. We show that these metrics have higher correlations with normalized task solvability scores than a variety of alternatives. These metrics can also be used for fast and compute-efficient optimizations of key design parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T17:49:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.