Interpretable Machine Learning for Weather and Climate Prediction: A Survey

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18864v1
• Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 14:23:35 GMT
• Title: Interpretable Machine Learning for Weather and Climate Prediction: A Survey
• Authors: Ruyi Yang, Jingyu Hu, Zihao Li, Jianli Mu, Tingzhao Yu, Jiangjiang Xia, Xuhong Li, Aritra Dasgupta, Haoyi Xiong,
• Abstract summary: We review current interpretable machine learning approaches applied to meteorological predictions. Design inherently interpretable models from scratch using architectures like tree ensembles and explainable neural networks. We discuss research challenges around achieving deeper mechanistic interpretations aligned with physical principles.
• Score: 24.028385794099435
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Advanced machine learning models have recently achieved high predictive accuracy for weather and climate prediction. However, these complex models often lack inherent transparency and interpretability, acting as "black boxes" that impede user trust and hinder further model improvements. As such, interpretable machine learning techniques have become crucial in enhancing the credibility and utility of weather and climate modeling. In this survey, we review current interpretable machine learning approaches applied to meteorological predictions. We categorize methods into two major paradigms: 1) Post-hoc interpretability techniques that explain pre-trained models, such as perturbation-based, game theory based, and gradient-based attribution methods. 2) Designing inherently interpretable models from scratch using architectures like tree ensembles and explainable neural networks. We summarize how each technique provides insights into the predictions, uncovering novel meteorological relationships captured by machine learning. Lastly, we discuss research challenges around achieving deeper mechanistic interpretations aligned with physical principles, developing standardized evaluation benchmarks, integrating interpretability into iterative model development workflows, and providing explainability for large foundation models.

Related papers

• Tackling the Accuracy-Interpretability Trade-off in a Hierarchy of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Extreme Heatwaves [41.94295877935867]
  We perform probabilistic forecasts of extreme heatwaves over France using a hierarchy of increasingly complex Machine Learning models. CNNs provide higher accuracy, but their black-box nature severely limits interpretability. ScatNet achieves similar performance to CNNs while providing greater transparency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T18:15:04Z)
• Deep Learning for Koopman Operator Estimation in Idealized Atmospheric Dynamics [2.2489531925874013]
  Deep learning is revolutionizing weather forecasting, with new data-driven models achieving accuracy on par with operational physical models for medium-term predictions. These models often lack interpretability, making their underlying dynamics difficult to understand and explain. This paper proposes methodologies to estimate the Koopman operator, providing a linear representation of complex nonlinear dynamics to enhance the transparency of data-driven models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T13:56:54Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Learning-Based Traffic Forecasting [42.31238891397725]
  This study aims to leverage an Explainable AI approach, counterfactual explanations, to enhance the explainability and usability of deep learning-based traffic forecasting models. The study first implements a deep learning model to predict traffic speed based on historical traffic data and contextual variables. Counterfactual explanations are then used to illuminate how alterations in these input variables affect predicted outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T11:26:31Z)
• Predictive Churn with the Set of Good Models [64.05949860750235]
  We study the effect of conflicting predictions over the set of near-optimal machine learning models. We present theoretical results on the expected churn between models within the Rashomon set. We show how our approach can be used to better anticipate, reduce, and avoid churn in consumer-facing applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:15:25Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• Towards Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Learning Models via Inverse Reinforcement Learning [27.841725567976315]
  We propose a novel framework utilizing Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning. This framework provides global explanations for decisions made by a Reinforcement Learning model. We capture intuitive tendencies that the model follows by summarizing the model's decision-making process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T17:01:59Z)
• Hessian-based toolbox for reliable and interpretable machine learning in physics [58.720142291102135]
  We present a toolbox for interpretability and reliability, extrapolation of the model architecture. It provides a notion of the influence of the input data on the prediction at a given test point, an estimation of the uncertainty of the model predictions, and an agnostic score for the model predictions. Our work opens the road to the systematic use of interpretability and reliability methods in ML applied to physics and, more generally, science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T16:32:59Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Generative Temporal Difference Learning for Infinite-Horizon Prediction [101.59882753763888]
  We introduce the $gamma$-model, a predictive model of environment dynamics with an infinite probabilistic horizon. We discuss how its training reflects an inescapable tradeoff between training-time and testing-time compounding errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T17:54:12Z)
• Deducing neighborhoods of classes from a fitted model [68.8204255655161]
  In this article a new kind of interpretable machine learning method is presented. It can help to understand the partitioning of the feature space into predicted classes in a classification model using quantile shifts. Basically, real data points (or specific points of interest) are used and the changes of the prediction after slightly raising or decreasing specific features are observed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-11T16:35:53Z)
• Introduction to Rare-Event Predictive Modeling for Inferential Statisticians -- A Hands-On Application in the Prediction of Breakthrough Patents [0.0]
  We introduce a machine learning (ML) approach to quantitative analysis geared towards optimizing the predictive performance. We discuss the potential synergies between the two fields against the backdrop of this, at first glance, target-incompatibility. We are providing a hands-on predictive modeling introduction for a quantitative social science audience while aiming at demystifying computer science jargon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-30T13:06:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.