Equity in Healthcare: Analyzing Disparities in Machine Learning Predictions of Diabetic Patient Readmissions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19057v1
• Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 23:49:22 GMT
• Title: Equity in Healthcare: Analyzing Disparities in Machine Learning Predictions of Diabetic Patient Readmissions
• Abstract summary: This study investigates how machine learning (ML) models can predict hospital readmissions for diabetic patients fairly and accurately across different demographics. We compared models like Deep Learning, Generalized Linear Models, Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), and Naive Bayes. GBM stood out with an F1-score of 84.3% and accuracy of 82.2%, accurately predicting readmissions across demographics.
• Score: 2.321323878201932
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study investigates how machine learning (ML) models can predict hospital readmissions for diabetic patients fairly and accurately across different demographics (age, gender, race). We compared models like Deep Learning, Generalized Linear Models, Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), and Naive Bayes. GBM stood out with an F1-score of 84.3% and accuracy of 82.2%, accurately predicting readmissions across demographics. A fairness analysis was conducted across all the models. GBM minimized disparities in predictions, achieving balanced results across genders and races. It showed low False Discovery Rates (FDR) (6-7%) and False Positive Rates (FPR) (5%) for both genders. Additionally, FDRs remained low for racial groups, such as African Americans (8%) and Asians (7%). Similarly, FPRs were consistent across age groups (4%) for both patients under 40 and those above 40, indicating its precision and ability to reduce bias. These findings emphasize the importance of choosing ML models carefully to ensure both accuracy and fairness for all patients. By showcasing effectiveness of various models with fairness metrics, this study promotes personalized medicine and the need for fair ML algorithms in healthcare. This can ultimately reduce disparities and improve outcomes for diabetic patients of all backgrounds.

Related papers

• PsychBench: Auditing Epidemiological Fidelity in Large Language Model Mental Health Simulations [0.0]
  Large language models are increasingly deployed to simulate patients for clinical training, research, and mental health tools.<n>We introduce PsychBench, the first epidemiological audit of LLM patient simulation.<n>We show that models produce clinically plausible individuals while misrepresenting the populations they are drawn from.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-19T10:05:25Z)
• Explainable Admission-Level Predictive Modeling for Prolonged Hospital Stay in Elderly Populations: Challenges in Low- and Middle-Income Countries [65.4286079244589]
  Prolonged length of stay (pLoS) is a significant factor associated with the risk of adverse in-hospital events.<n>We develop and explain a predictive model for pLos using admission-level patient and hospital administrative data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T23:35:24Z)
• Predicting Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease using Machine Learning Methods [0.8642326601683298]
  We developed a fair, rigorous, and reproducible MASLD prediction model.<n>MASLD affects 33% of U.S. adults and is the most common chronic liver disease.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-25T13:36:18Z)
• Predicting Length of Stay in Neurological ICU Patients Using Classical Machine Learning and Neural Network Models: A Benchmark Study on MIMIC-IV [49.1574468325115]
  This study explores multiple ML approaches for predicting LOS in ICU specifically for the patients with neurological diseases based on the MIMIC-IV dataset.<n>The evaluated models include classic ML algorithms (K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, XGBoost and CatBoost) and Neural Networks (LSTM, BERT and Temporal Fusion Transformer)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T14:06:42Z)
• Medical Hallucinations in Foundation Models and Their Impact on Healthcare [71.15392179084428]
  Hallucinations in foundation models arise from autoregressive training objectives.<n>Top-performing models exceeded 97% accuracy when augmented with chain-of-thought prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T02:30:44Z)
• Using Pre-training and Interaction Modeling for ancestry-specific disease prediction in UK Biobank [69.90493129893112]
  Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered the genetic basis of complex traits, but show an under-representation of non-European descent individuals. Here, we assess whether we can improve disease prediction across diverse ancestries using multiomic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T16:39:50Z)
• Fairness Evolution in Continual Learning for Medical Imaging [47.52603262576663]
  We study the behavior of Continual Learning (CL) strategies in medical imaging regarding classification performance. We evaluate the Replay, Learning without Forgetting (LwF), LwF, and Pseudo-Label strategies. LwF and Pseudo-Label exhibit optimal classification performance, but when including fairness metrics in the evaluation, it is clear that Pseudo-Label is less biased.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T09:48:52Z)
• FERI: A Multitask-based Fairness Achieving Algorithm with Applications to Fair Organ Transplantation [15.481475313958219]
  We introduce Fairness through the Equitable Rate of Improvement in Multitask Learning (FERI) algorithm for fair predictions of graft failure risk in liver transplant patients. FERI constrains subgroup loss by balancing learning rates and preventing subgroup dominance in the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T21:14:07Z)
• A Study of Age and Sex Bias in Multiple Instance Learning based Classification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Subtypes [44.077241051884926]
  We train multiple MIL models using different levels of sex imbalance in the training set and excluding certain age groups. We find a significant effect of sex and age bias on the performance of the model for AML subtype classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T09:32:46Z)
• Fair Patient Model: Mitigating Bias in the Patient Representation Learned from the Electronic Health Records [7.467693938220289]
  We applied the proposed model, called Fair Patient Model (FPM), to a sample of 34,739 patients from the MIMIC-III dataset. FPM outperformed the baseline models in terms of three fairness metrics: demographic parity, equality of opportunity difference, and equalized odds ratio.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T18:40:35Z)
• Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts [49.10233060774818]
  We show that learning realistic augmentations automatically from data is possible in a label-efficient manner using generative models. We demonstrate that these learned augmentations can surpass ones by making models more robust and statistically fair in- and out-of-distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T18:15:38Z)
• Fairness and bias correction in machine learning for depression prediction: results from four study populations [3.3136009643108038]
  We present a systematic study of bias in machine learning models designed to predict depression. We find that standard ML approaches show regularly biased behaviors. We also show that mitigation techniques, both standard and our own post-hoc method, can be effective in reducing the level of unfair bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T03:53:17Z)
• Deep Learning Discovery of Demographic Biomarkers in Echocardiography [0.3957768262206625]
  We test whether it is possible to predict age, race, and sex from cardiac ultrasound images using deep learning algorithms. We trained video-based convolutional neural networks to predict age, sex, and race. We found that deep learning models were able to identify age and sex, while unable to reliably predict race.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T16:48:49Z)
• Federated Learning Enables Big Data for Rare Cancer Boundary Detection [98.5549882883963]
  We present findings from the largest Federated ML study to-date, involving data from 71 healthcare institutions across 6 continents. We generate an automatic tumor boundary detector for the rare disease of glioblastoma. We demonstrate a 33% improvement over a publicly trained model to delineate the surgically targetable tumor, and 23% improvement over the tumor's entire extent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T17:27:00Z)
• Assessing Social Determinants-Related Performance Bias of Machine Learning Models: A case of Hyperchloremia Prediction in ICU Population [6.8473641147443995]
  We evaluated four classifiers built to predict Hyperchloremia, a condition that often results from aggressive fluids administration in the ICU population. We observed that adding social determinants features in addition to the lab-based ones improved model performance on all patients. We urge future researchers to design models that proactively adjust for potential biases and include subgroup reporting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T03:58:50Z)
• On the explainability of hospitalization prediction on a large COVID-19 patient dataset [45.82374977939355]
  We develop various AI models to predict hospitalization on a large (over 110$k$) cohort of COVID-19 positive-tested US patients. Despite high data unbalance, the models reach average precision 0.96-0.98 (0.75-0.85), recall 0.96-0.98 (0.74-0.85), and $F_score 0.97-0.98 (0.79-0.83) on the non-hospitalized (or hospitalized) class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-28T10:23:38Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.