CoderUJB: An Executable and Unified Java Benchmark for Practical Programming Scenarios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19287v1
• Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:19:18 GMT
• Title: CoderUJB: An Executable and Unified Java Benchmark for Practical Programming Scenarios
• Authors: Zhengran Zeng, Yidong Wang, Rui Xie, Wei Ye, Shikun Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce CoderUJB, a new benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) across diverse Java programming tasks. Our empirical study on this benchmark investigates the coding abilities of various open-source and closed-source LLMs. The findings indicate that while LLMs exhibit strong potential, challenges remain, particularly in non-functional code generation.
• Score: 25.085449990951034
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the evolving landscape of large language models (LLMs) tailored for software engineering, the need for benchmarks that accurately reflect real-world development scenarios is paramount. Current benchmarks are either too simplistic or fail to capture the multi-tasking nature of software development. To address this, we introduce CoderUJB, a new benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs across diverse Java programming tasks that are executable and reflective of actual development scenarios, acknowledging Java's prevalence in real-world software production. CoderUJB comprises 2,239 programming questions derived from 17 real open-source Java projects and spans five practical programming tasks. Our empirical study on this benchmark investigates the coding abilities of various open-source and closed-source LLMs, examining the effects of continued pre-training in specific programming languages code and instruction fine-tuning on their performance. The findings indicate that while LLMs exhibit strong potential, challenges remain, particularly in non-functional code generation (e.g., test generation and defect detection). Importantly, our results advise caution in the specific programming languages continued pre-training and instruction fine-tuning, as these techniques could hinder model performance on certain tasks, suggesting the need for more nuanced strategies. CoderUJB thus marks a significant step towards more realistic evaluations of programming capabilities in LLMs, and our study provides valuable insights for the future development of these models in software engineering.

Related papers

• SURGE: On the Potential of Large Language Models as General-Purpose Surrogate Code Executors [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code-related tasks, such as code understanding and code generation. However, an equally important yet underexplored question is whether LLMs can serve as general-purpose surrogate code executors. This study provides empirical insights into the feasibility of using LLMs as surrogate code executors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T15:38:19Z)
• Large Language Models for Code Generation: The Practitioners Perspective [4.946128083535776]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as coding assistants, capable of generating source code from natural language prompts. We propose and develop a multi-model unified platform to generate and execute code based on natural language prompts. We conducted a survey with 60 software practitioners from 11 countries across four continents to evaluate the usability, performance, strengths, and limitations of each model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T14:52:16Z)
• Studying and Benchmarking Large Language Models For Log Level Suggestion [49.176736212364496]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a focal point of research across various domains. This paper investigates the impact of characteristics and learning paradigms on the performance of 12 open-source LLMs in log level suggestion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T03:52:17Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [80.18342600996601]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions. We develop a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types. We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• CodeEditorBench: Evaluating Code Editing Capability of Large Language Models [49.387195629660994]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) for code are rapidly evolving, with code editing emerging as a critical capability. We introduce CodeEditorBench, an evaluation framework designed to rigorously assess the performance of LLMs in code editing tasks. We curate diverse coding challenges and scenarios from five sources, covering various programming languages, complexity levels, and editing tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:49:49Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Study [72.24266814625685]
  We explore the performance of large language models (LLMs) across the entire software development lifecycle with DevEval. DevEval features four programming languages, multiple domains, high-quality data collection, and carefully designed and verified metrics for each task. Empirical studies show that current LLMs, including GPT-4, fail to solve the challenges presented within DevEval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T15:13:44Z)
• Copilot Evaluation Harness: Evaluating LLM-Guided Software Programming [12.355284125578342]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a focal point in modern software development. LLMs offer the potential to significantly augment developer productivity by serving as intelligent, chat-driven programming assistants. However, each system requires the LLM to be honed to its set of workspaces to ensure the best performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T03:51:34Z)
• If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agents [81.60906807941188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a combination of natural language and formal language (code) Code translates high-level goals into executable steps, featuring standard syntax, logical consistency, abstraction, and modularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T16:51:20Z)
• CodeScope: An Execution-based Multilingual Multitask Multidimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Code Understanding and Generation [18.354576598908448]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on assisting humans in programming. Existing benchmarks for evaluating the code understanding and generation capacities of LLMs suffer from severe limitations. We introduce CodeScope, an execution-based, multilingual, multitask, multidimensional evaluation benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T23:18:52Z)
• L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.00201523306986]
  We present L2CEval, a systematic evaluation of the language-to-code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We analyze the factors that potentially affect their performance, such as model size, pretraining data, instruction tuning, and different prompting methods. In addition to assessing model performance, we measure confidence calibration for the models and conduct human evaluations of the output programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:57:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.