Cycling on the Freeway: The Perilous State of Open Source Neuroscience Software

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19394v1
• Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:11:09 GMT
• Title: Cycling on the Freeway: The Perilous State of Open Source Neuroscience Software
• Authors: Britta U. Westner, Daniel R. McCloy, Eric Larson, Alexandre Gramfort, Daniel S. Katz, Arfon M. Smith, invited co-signees,
• Abstract summary: We will argue that the existing ecosystem of neuroscientific open source software is brittle. In recent years there has been a shift toward relying on free, open-source scientific software (FOSSS) for neuroscience data analysis.
• Score: 46.83624918571962
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Most scientists need software to perform their research (Barker et al., 2020; Carver et al., 2022; Hettrick, 2014; Hettrick et al., 2014; Switters and Osimo, 2019), and neuroscientists are no exception. Whether we work with reaction times, electrophysiological signals, or magnetic resonance imaging data, we rely on software to acquire, analyze, and statistically evaluate the raw data we obtain - or to generate such data if we work with simulations. In recent years there has been a shift toward relying on free, open-source scientific software (FOSSS) for neuroscience data analysis (Poldrack et al., 2019), in line with the broader open science movement in academia (McKiernan et al., 2016) and wider industry trends (Eghbal, 2016). Importantly, FOSSS is typically developed by working scientists (not professional software developers) which sets up a precarious situation given the nature of the typical academic workplace (wherein academics, especially in their early careers, are on short and fixed term contracts). In this paper, we will argue that the existing ecosystem of neuroscientific open source software is brittle, and discuss why and how the neuroscience community needs to come together to ensure a healthy growth of our software landscape to the benefit of all.

Related papers

• Requirements Engineering for Research Software: A Vision [2.2217676348694213]
  Most researchers creating software for scientific purposes are not trained in Software Engineering. Research software is often developed ad hoc without following stringent processes. We describe how researchers elicit, document, and analyze requirements for research software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T14:25:01Z)
• Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results [60.26891446026707]
  Large language models (LLMs) forecast novel results better than human experts. BrainBench is a benchmark for predicting neuroscience results. Our approach is not neuroscience-specific and is transferable to other knowledge-intensive endeavors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T15:27:59Z)
• A Review of Neuroscience-Inspired Machine Learning [58.72729525961739]
  Bio-plausible credit assignment is compatible with practically any learning condition and is energy-efficient. In this paper, we survey several vital algorithms that model bio-plausible rules of credit assignment in artificial neural networks. We conclude by discussing the future challenges that will need to be addressed in order to make such algorithms more useful in practical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T18:05:09Z)
• SciCat: A Curated Dataset of Scientific Software Repositories [4.77982299447395]
  We introduce the SciCat dataset -- a comprehensive collection of Free-Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects. Our approach involves selecting projects from a pool of 131 million deforked repositories from the World of Code data source. Our classification focuses on software designed for scientific purposes, research-related projects, and research support software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T13:46:33Z)
• Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 [73.06361680847708]
  In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI, but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI (many in computer science), but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. We conclude that the context of the current surge appears different, and that interdisciplinary AI application is likely to be sustained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T14:08:07Z)
• Spherical Fourier Neural Operators: Learning Stable Dynamics on the Sphere [53.63505583883769]
  We introduce Spherical FNOs (SFNOs) for learning operators on spherical geometries. SFNOs have important implications for machine learning-based simulation of climate dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T16:27:17Z)
• An overview of open source Deep Learning-based libraries for Neuroscience [0.0]
  This paper summarizes the main developments in Deep Learning and their relevance to Neuroscience. It then reviews neuroinformatic toolboxes and libraries, collected from the literature and from specific hubs of software projects oriented to neuroscience research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T09:09:40Z)
• Reflections on the Evolution of Computer Science Education [0.0]
  Until about a decade ago, theory of computation, algorithm design and system software dominated the curricula. This column analyses why this changed Circa 2010 when elective subjects across scores of topics become part of mainstream education. The goal of this experiential piece is to trigger a lively discussion on the past and future of Computer Science education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-09T07:07:12Z)
• Data science and Machine learning in the Clouds: A Perspective for the Future [0.0]
  Data driven science (the so called fourth science paradigm) is going to be the driving force in research and innovation. Huge amount of data to be processed under this new paradigm will be a major concern in the future. One will strongly require cloud based services in all the aspects of these computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T17:36:24Z)
• Interleaving Computational and Inferential Thinking: Data Science for Undergraduates at Berkeley [81.01051375191828]
  The undergraduate data science curriculum at the University of California, Berkeley is anchored in five new courses. These courses emphasize computational thinking, inferential thinking, and working on real-world problems. These courses have become some of the most popular on campus and have led to a surging interest in a new undergraduate major and minor program in data science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-13T22:51:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.