The Promises and Pitfalls of Using Language Models to Measure Instruction Quality in Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02444v1
• Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:15:29 GMT
• Title: The Promises and Pitfalls of Using Language Models to Measure Instruction Quality in Education
• Authors: Paiheng Xu, Jing Liu, Nathan Jones, Julie Cohen, Wei Ai,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents the first study that leverages Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to assess multiple high-inference instructional practices. We confront two challenges inherent in NLP-based instructional analysis, including noisy and long input data and highly skewed distributions of human ratings.
• Score: 3.967610895056427
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Assessing instruction quality is a fundamental component of any improvement efforts in the education system. However, traditional manual assessments are expensive, subjective, and heavily dependent on observers' expertise and idiosyncratic factors, preventing teachers from getting timely and frequent feedback. Different from prior research that mostly focuses on low-inference instructional practices on a singular basis, this paper presents the first study that leverages Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to assess multiple high-inference instructional practices in two distinct educational settings: in-person K-12 classrooms and simulated performance tasks for pre-service teachers. This is also the first study that applies NLP to measure a teaching practice that is widely acknowledged to be particularly effective for students with special needs. We confront two challenges inherent in NLP-based instructional analysis, including noisy and long input data and highly skewed distributions of human ratings. Our results suggest that pretrained Language Models (PLMs) demonstrate performances comparable to the agreement level of human raters for variables that are more discrete and require lower inference, but their efficacy diminishes with more complex teaching practices. Interestingly, using only teachers' utterances as input yields strong results for student-centered variables, alleviating common concerns over the difficulty of collecting and transcribing high-quality student speech data in in-person teaching settings. Our findings highlight both the potential and the limitations of current NLP techniques in the education domain, opening avenues for further exploration.

Related papers

• Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
  We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes. We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function. Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z)
• Human-AI Collaborative Essay Scoring: A Dual-Process Framework with LLMs [13.262711792955377]
  This study explores the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated essay scoring. We propose an open-source LLM-based AES system, inspired by the dual-process theory. We find that our system not only automates the grading process but also enhances the performance and efficiency of human graders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T07:50:10Z)
• Revealing Networks: Understanding Effective Teacher Practices in AI-Supported Classrooms using Transmodal Ordered Network Analysis [0.9187505256430948]
  The present study uses transmodal ordered network analysis to understand effective teacher practices in relationship to traditional metrics of in-system learning in a mathematics classroom working with AI tutors. Comparing teacher practices by student learning rates, we find that students with low learning rates exhibited more hint use after monitoring. Students with low learning rates showed learning behavior similar to their high learning rate peers, achieving repeated correct attempts in the tutor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T21:50:02Z)
• Mean BERTs make erratic language teachers: the effectiveness of latent bootstrapping in low-resource settings [5.121744234312891]
  latent bootstrapping is an alternative self-supervision technique for pretraining language models. We conduct experiments to assess how effective this approach is for acquiring linguistic knowledge from limited resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T10:31:32Z)
• A Hierarchy-based Analysis Approach for Blended Learning: A Case Study with Chinese Students [12.533646830917213]
  This paper proposes a hierarchy-based evaluation approach for blended learning evaluation. The results show that cognitive engagement and emotional engagement play a more important role in blended learning evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T00:09:00Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey [53.6014921995006]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive textual corpora have emerged as leading solutions for a broad array of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite their notable performance, these models are prone to certain limitations such as misunderstanding human instructions, generating potentially biased content, or factually incorrect information. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of these alignment technologies, including the following aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T17:44:58Z)
• Few-shot Named Entity Recognition with Cloze Questions [3.561183926088611]
  We propose a simple and intuitive adaptation of Pattern-Exploiting Training (PET), a recent approach which combines the cloze-questions mechanism and fine-tuning for few-shot learning. Our approach achieves considerably better performance than standard fine-tuning and comparable or improved results with respect to other few-shot baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-24T11:08:59Z)
• Towards Quantifiable Dialogue Coherence Evaluation [126.55560816209756]
  Quantifiable Dialogue Coherence Evaluation (QuantiDCE) is a novel framework aiming to train a quantifiable dialogue coherence metric. QuantiDCE includes two training stages, Multi-Level Ranking (MLR) pre-training and Knowledge Distillation (KD) fine-tuning. Experimental results show that the model trained by QuantiDCE presents stronger correlations with human judgements than the other state-of-the-art metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T14:11:17Z)
• Exploring Bayesian Deep Learning for Urgent Instructor Intervention Need in MOOC Forums [58.221459787471254]
  Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have become a popular choice for e-learning thanks to their great flexibility. Due to large numbers of learners and their diverse backgrounds, it is taxing to offer real-time support. With the large volume of posts and high workloads for MOOC instructors, it is unlikely that the instructors can identify all learners requiring intervention. This paper explores for the first time Bayesian deep learning on learner-based text posts with two methods: Monte Carlo Dropout and Variational Inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T15:12:13Z)
• The Challenges of Assessing and Evaluating the Students at Distance [77.34726150561087]
  The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a strong effect on higher education institutions with the closure of classroom teaching activities. This short essay aims to explore the challenges posed to Portuguese higher education institutions and to analyze the challenges posed to evaluation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-30T13:13:45Z)
• Neural Multi-Task Learning for Teacher Question Detection in Online Classrooms [50.19997675066203]
  We build an end-to-end neural framework that automatically detects questions from teachers' audio recordings. By incorporating multi-task learning techniques, we are able to strengthen the understanding of semantic relations among different types of questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-16T02:17:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.