Data-Driven Goal Recognition Design for General Behavioral Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03054v2
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 20:45:56 GMT
• Title: Data-Driven Goal Recognition Design for General Behavioral Agents
• Authors: Robert Kasumba, Guanghui Yu, Chien-Ju Ho, Sarah Keren, William Yeoh,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a data-driven approach to goal recognition design that can account for agents with general behavioral models. We propose a gradient-based optimization framework that accommodates various constraints to optimize decision-making environments.
• Score: 14.750023724230774
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Goal recognition design aims to make limited modifications to decision-making environments with the goal of making it easier to infer the goals of agents acting within those environments. Although various research efforts have been made in goal recognition design, existing approaches are computationally demanding and often assume that agents are (near-)optimal in their decision-making. To address these limitations, we introduce a data-driven approach to goal recognition design that can account for agents with general behavioral models. Following existing literature, we use worst-case distinctiveness($\textit{wcd}$) as a measure of the difficulty in inferring the goal of an agent in a decision-making environment. Our approach begins by training a machine learning model to predict the $\textit{wcd}$ for a given environment and the agent behavior model. We then propose a gradient-based optimization framework that accommodates various constraints to optimize decision-making environments for enhanced goal recognition. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing methods in reducing $\textit{wcd}$ and enhancing runtime efficiency in conventional setup. Moreover, our approach also adapts to settings in which existing approaches do not apply, such as those involving flexible budget constraints, more complex environments, and suboptimal agent behavior. Finally, we have conducted human-subject experiments which confirm that our method can create environments that facilitate efficient goal recognition from real-world human decision-makers.

Related papers

• Policy Disruption in Reinforcement Learning:Adversarial Attack with Large Language Models and Critical State Identification [8.292056374554162]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved remarkable success in fields like robotics and autonomous driving.<n>Existing approaches often rely on modifying the environment or policy, limiting their practicality.<n>This paper proposes an adversarial attack method in which existing agents in the environment guide the target policy to output suboptimal actions without altering the environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T05:52:06Z)
• ORMind: A Cognitive-Inspired End-to-End Reasoning Framework for Operations Research [53.736407871322314]
  We introduce ORMind, a cognitive-inspired framework that enhances optimization through counterfactual reasoning.<n>Our approach emulates human cognition, implementing an end-to-end workflow that transforms requirements into mathematical models and executable code.<n>It is currently being tested internally in Lenovo's AI Assistant, with plans to enhance optimization capabilities for both business and consumer customers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T05:11:21Z)
• An Optimisation Framework for Unsupervised Environment Design [88.29733214939544]
  unsupervised environment design (UED) aims to maximise agent's general robustness.<n>We provide a provably convergent algorithm in the zero-sum setting.<n>We empirically verify the efficacy of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T03:07:26Z)
• Adaptive Target Localization under Uncertainty using Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning with Knowledge Transfer [15.605693371392212]
  This work proposes a novel MADRL-based method for target localization in uncertain environments. The observations of the agents are designed in an optimized manner to capture essential information in the environment. A Deep Learning model builds on the knowledge from the MADRL model to accurately estimating the target location if it is unreachable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-19T02:58:22Z)
• Towards Measuring Goal-Directedness in AI Systems [0.0]
  A key prerequisite for AI systems pursuing unintended goals is whether they will behave in a coherent and goal-directed manner. We propose a new family of definitions of the goal-directedness of a policy that analyze whether it is well-modeled as near-optimal for many reward functions. Our contribution is a definition of goal-directedness that is simpler and more easily computable in order to approach the question of whether AI systems could pursue dangerous goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T01:34:42Z)
• Metareasoning in uncertain environments: a meta-BAMDP framework [1.0923877073891441]
  This paper proposes a meta Bayes-Adaptive MDP framework to handle metareasoning in environments with unknown reward/transition distributions. As a first step, we apply the framework to two-armed Bernoulli bandit (TABB) tasks, which have often been used to study human decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:15:01Z)
• Satisficing Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learning [26.73584163318647]
  In complex environments that approach the vastness and scale of the real world, attaining optimal performance may in fact be an entirely intractable endeavor. Recent work has leveraged tools from information theory to design agents that deliberately forgo optimal solutions in favor of sufficiently-satisfying or satisficing solutions. We extend an agent that directly represents uncertainty over the optimal value function allowing it to both bypass the need for model-based planning and to learn satisficing policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T21:28:03Z)
• Modeling Boundedly Rational Agents with Latent Inference Budgets [56.24971011281947]
  We introduce a latent inference budget model (L-IBM) that models agents' computational constraints explicitly. L-IBMs make it possible to learn agent models using data from diverse populations of suboptimal actors. We show that L-IBMs match or outperform Boltzmann models of decision-making under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T03:55:51Z)
• Constrained Environment Optimization for Prioritized Multi-Agent Navigation [11.473177123332281]
  This paper aims to consider the environment as a decision variable in a system-level optimization problem. We propose novel problems of unprioritized and prioritized environment optimization. We show, through formal proofs, under which conditions the environment can change while guaranteeing completeness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T18:55:06Z)
• When Demonstrations Meet Generative World Models: A Maximum Likelihood Framework for Offline Inverse Reinforcement Learning [62.00672284480755]
  This paper aims to recover the structure of rewards and environment dynamics that underlie observed actions in a fixed, finite set of demonstrations from an expert agent. Accurate models of expertise in executing a task has applications in safety-sensitive applications such as clinical decision making and autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T04:14:20Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Diverse Human Preferences [68.4294547285359]
  This paper develops a method for crowd-sourcing preference labels and learning from diverse human preferences. The proposed method is tested on a variety of tasks in DMcontrol and Meta-world. It has shown consistent and significant improvements over existing preference-based RL algorithms when learning from diverse feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T15:18:54Z)
• Discrete Factorial Representations as an Abstraction for Goal Conditioned Reinforcement Learning [99.38163119531745]
  We show that applying a discretizing bottleneck can improve performance in goal-conditioned RL setups. We experimentally prove the expected return on out-of-distribution goals, while still allowing for specifying goals with expressive structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T03:31:43Z)
• Deciding What to Model: Value-Equivalent Sampling for Reinforcement Learning [21.931580762349096]
  We introduce an algorithm that computes an approximately-value-equivalent, lossy compression of the environment which an agent may feasibly target in lieu of the true model. We prove an information-theoretic, Bayesian regret bound for our algorithm that holds for any finite-horizon, episodic sequential decision-making problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T23:36:38Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with a Terminator [80.34572413850186]
  We learn the parameters of the TerMDP and leverage the structure of the estimation problem to provide state-wise confidence bounds. We use these to construct a provably-efficient algorithm, which accounts for termination, and bound its regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-30T18:40:28Z)
• Deceptive Decision-Making Under Uncertainty [25.197098169762356]
  We study the design of autonomous agents that are capable of deceiving outside observers about their intentions while carrying out tasks. By modeling the agent's behavior as a Markov decision process, we consider a setting where the agent aims to reach one of multiple potential goals. We propose a novel approach to model observer predictions based on the principle of maximum entropy and to efficiently generate deceptive strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-14T14:56:23Z)
• Online reinforcement learning with sparse rewards through an active inference capsule [62.997667081978825]
  This paper introduces an active inference agent which minimizes the novel free energy of the expected future. Our model is capable of solving sparse-reward problems with a very high sample efficiency. We also introduce a novel method for approximating the prior model from the reward function, which simplifies the expression of complex objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T10:03:36Z)
• Outcome-Driven Reinforcement Learning via Variational Inference [95.82770132618862]
  We discuss a new perspective on reinforcement learning, recasting it as the problem of inferring actions that achieve desired outcomes, rather than a problem of maximizing rewards. To solve the resulting outcome-directed inference problem, we establish a novel variational inference formulation that allows us to derive a well-shaped reward function. We empirically demonstrate that this method eliminates the need to design reward functions and leads to effective goal-directed behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-20T18:16:21Z)
• Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Person re-ID via k-Reciprocal Clustering and Large-Scale Heterogeneous Environment Synthesis [76.46004354572956]
  We introduce an unsupervised domain adaptation approach for person re-identification. Experimental results show that the proposed ktCUDA and SHRED approach achieves an average improvement of +5.7 mAP in re-identification performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-14T17:43:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.