How to Evaluate Entity Resolution Systems: An Entity-Centric Framework with Application to Inventor Name Disambiguation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05622v1
• Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 15:53:29 GMT
• Title: How to Evaluate Entity Resolution Systems: An Entity-Centric Framework with Application to Inventor Name Disambiguation
• Authors: Olivier Binette, Youngsoo Baek, Siddharth Engineer, Christina Jones, Abel Dasylva, Jerome P. Reiter,
• Abstract summary: We propose an entity-centric data labeling methodology that integrates with a unified framework for monitoring summary statistics. These benchmark data sets can then be used for model training and a variety of evaluation tasks.
• Score: 1.7812428873698403
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Entity resolution (record linkage, microclustering) systems are notoriously difficult to evaluate. Looking for a needle in a haystack, traditional evaluation methods use sophisticated, application-specific sampling schemes to find matching pairs of records among an immense number of non-matches. We propose an alternative that facilitates the creation of representative, reusable benchmark data sets without necessitating complex sampling schemes. These benchmark data sets can then be used for model training and a variety of evaluation tasks. Specifically, we propose an entity-centric data labeling methodology that integrates with a unified framework for monitoring summary statistics, estimating key performance metrics such as cluster and pairwise precision and recall, and analyzing root causes for errors. We validate the framework in an application to inventor name disambiguation and through simulation studies. Software: https://github.com/OlivierBinette/er-evaluation/

Related papers

• Efficient Failure Pattern Identification of Predictive Algorithms [15.02620042972929]
  We propose a human-machine collaborative framework that consists of a team of human annotators and a sequential recommendation algorithm. The results empirically demonstrate the competitive performance of our framework on multiple datasets at various signal-to-noise ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T14:54:42Z)
• Revisiting the Evaluation of Image Synthesis with GANs [55.72247435112475]
  This study presents an empirical investigation into the evaluation of synthesis performance, with generative adversarial networks (GANs) as a representative of generative models. In particular, we make in-depth analyses of various factors, including how to represent a data point in the representation space, how to calculate a fair distance using selected samples, and how many instances to use from each set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T17:54:32Z)
• High-Level Synthetic Data Generation with Data Set Archetypes [4.13592995550836]
  Cluster analysis relies on effective benchmarks for evaluating and comparing different algorithms. We propose synthetic data generation based on data set archetypes. It is possible to set up benchmarks purely from verbal descriptions of the evaluation scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T23:45:27Z)
• Exploring validation metrics for offline model-based optimisation with diffusion models [50.404829846182764]
  In model-based optimisation (MBO) we are interested in using machine learning to design candidates that maximise some measure of reward with respect to a black box function called the (ground truth) oracle. While an approximation to the ground oracle can be trained and used in place of it during model validation to measure the mean reward over generated candidates, the evaluation is approximate and vulnerable to adversarial examples. This is encapsulated under our proposed evaluation framework which is also designed to measure extrapolation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T16:57:37Z)
• Entity Matching by Pool-based Active Learning [2.690502103971799]
  In this paper, we present an active learning method ALMatcher for the entity matching tasks. This method needs to manually label only a small number of valuable samples, and use these samples to build a model with high quality. The proposed method has been validated on seven data sets in different fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T07:31:43Z)
• CEREAL: Few-Sample Clustering Evaluation [4.569028973407756]
  We focus on the underexplored problem of estimating clustering quality with limited labels. We introduce CEREAL, a comprehensive framework for few-sample clustering evaluation. Our results show that CEREAL reduces the area under the absolute error curve by up to 57% compared to the best sampling baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T19:52:41Z)
• Object Type Clustering using Markov Directly-Follow Multigraph in Object-Centric Process Mining [2.3351527694849574]
  This paper introduces a new approach to cluster similar case notions based on Markov Directly-Follow Multigraph. A threshold tuning algorithm is also defined to identify sets of different clusters that can be discovered based on different levels of similarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T12:36:46Z)
• Few-Shot Named Entity Recognition: A Comprehensive Study [92.40991050806544]
  We investigate three schemes to improve the model generalization ability for few-shot settings. We perform empirical comparisons on 10 public NER datasets with various proportions of labeled data. We create new state-of-the-art results on both few-shot and training-free settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T23:43:16Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)
• Towards GAN Benchmarks Which Require Generalization [48.075521136623564]
  We argue that estimating the function must require a large sample from the model. We turn to neural network divergences (NNDs) which are defined in terms of a neural network trained to distinguish between distributions. The resulting benchmarks cannot be "won" by training set memorization, while still being perceptually correlated and computable only from samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-10T20:18:47Z)
• CONSAC: Robust Multi-Model Fitting by Conditional Sample Consensus [62.86856923633923]
  We present a robust estimator for fitting multiple parametric models of the same form to noisy measurements. In contrast to previous works, which resorted to hand-crafted search strategies for multiple model detection, we learn the search strategy from data. For self-supervised learning of the search, we evaluate the proposed algorithm on multi-homography estimation and demonstrate an accuracy that is superior to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-08T17:37:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.