Diverse Randomized Value Functions: A Provably Pessimistic Approach for Offline Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06188v1
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:15:18 GMT
- Title: Diverse Randomized Value Functions: A Provably Pessimistic Approach for Offline Reinforcement Learning
- Authors: Xudong Yu, Chenjia Bai, Hongyi Guo, Changhong Wang, Zhen Wang,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a novel strategy employing diverse randomized value functions to estimate the posterior distribution of $Q$-values.
It provides robust uncertainty quantification and estimates lower confidence bounds (LCB) of $Q$-values.
We also emphasize on diversity within randomized value functions and enhance efficiency by introducing a diversity regularization method, reducing the requisite number of networks.
- Score: 11.304227281260896
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) faces distributional shift and unreliable value estimation, especially for out-of-distribution (OOD) actions. To address this, existing uncertainty-based methods penalize the value function with uncertainty quantification and demand numerous ensemble networks, posing computational challenges and suboptimal outcomes. In this paper, we introduce a novel strategy employing diverse randomized value functions to estimate the posterior distribution of $Q$-values. It provides robust uncertainty quantification and estimates lower confidence bounds (LCB) of $Q$-values. By applying moderate value penalties for OOD actions, our method fosters a provably pessimistic approach. We also emphasize on diversity within randomized value functions and enhance efficiency by introducing a diversity regularization method, reducing the requisite number of networks. These modules lead to reliable value estimation and efficient policy learning from offline data. Theoretical analysis shows that our method recovers the provably efficient LCB-penalty under linear MDP assumptions. Extensive empirical results also demonstrate that our proposed method significantly outperforms baseline methods in terms of performance and parametric efficiency.
Related papers
- Statistical Inference for Temporal Difference Learning with Linear Function Approximation [62.69448336714418]
Temporal Difference (TD) learning, arguably the most widely used for policy evaluation, serves as a natural framework for this purpose.
In this paper, we study the consistency properties of TD learning with Polyak-Ruppert averaging and linear function approximation, and obtain three significant improvements over existing results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T15:34:44Z) - Sample Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning via Uncertainty Estimation [12.415463205960156]
In model-free deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, using noisy value estimates to supervise policy evaluation and optimization is detrimental to the sample efficiency.
We provide a systematic analysis of the sources of uncertainty in the noisy supervision that occurs in RL.
We propose a method whereby two complementary uncertainty estimation methods account for both the Q-value and the environmentity to better mitigate the negative impacts of noisy supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-05T15:46:06Z) - Variance-Aware Off-Policy Evaluation with Linear Function Approximation [85.75516599931632]
We study the off-policy evaluation problem in reinforcement learning with linear function approximation.
We propose an algorithm, VA-OPE, which uses the estimated variance of the value function to reweight the Bellman residual in Fitted Q-Iteration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-22T17:58:46Z) - Uncertainty Weighted Actor-Critic for Offline Reinforcement Learning [63.53407136812255]
Offline Reinforcement Learning promises to learn effective policies from previously-collected, static datasets without the need for exploration.
Existing Q-learning and actor-critic based off-policy RL algorithms fail when bootstrapping from out-of-distribution (OOD) actions or states.
We propose Uncertainty Weighted Actor-Critic (UWAC), an algorithm that detects OOD state-action pairs and down-weights their contribution in the training objectives accordingly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-17T20:16:46Z) - Bootstrapping Statistical Inference for Off-Policy Evaluation [43.79456564713911]
We study the use of bootstrapping in off-policy evaluation (OPE)
We propose a bootstrapping FQE method for inferring the distribution of the policy evaluation error and show that this method is efficient and consistent for off-policy statistical inference.
We evaluate the bootrapping method in classical RL environments for confidence interval estimation, estimating the variance of off-policy evaluator, and estimating the correlation between multiple off-policy evaluators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-06T16:45:33Z) - CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval Estimation [107.86876722777535]
We study high-confidence behavior-agnostic off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning.
We show in a variety of benchmarks that the confidence interval estimates are tighter and more accurate than existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T12:39:11Z) - Cross Learning in Deep Q-Networks [82.20059754270302]
We propose a novel cross Q-learning algorithm, aim at alleviating the well-known overestimation problem in value-based reinforcement learning methods.
Our algorithm builds on double Q-learning, by maintaining a set of parallel models and estimate the Q-value based on a randomly selected network.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-29T04:58:17Z) - Distributional Robustness and Regularization in Reinforcement Learning [62.23012916708608]
We introduce a new regularizer for empirical value functions and show that it lower bounds the Wasserstein distributionally robust value function.
It suggests using regularization as a practical tool for dealing with $textitexternal uncertainty$ in reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-05T19:56:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.