Uncertain Boundaries: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Copyright Issues in Generative AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08221v1
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 22:10:01 GMT
- Title: Uncertain Boundaries: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Copyright Issues in Generative AI
- Authors: Jocelyn Dzuong, Zichong Wang, Wenbin Zhang,
- Abstract summary: The survey aims to stay abreast of the latest developments and open problems.
It will first outline methods of detecting copyright infringement in mediums such as text, image, and video.
Next, it will delve an exploration of existing techniques aimed at safeguarding copyrighted works from generative models.
- Score: 2.669847575321326
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: In the rapidly evolving landscape of generative artificial intelligence (AI), the increasingly pertinent issue of copyright infringement arises as AI advances to generate content from scraped copyrighted data, prompting questions about ownership and protection that impact professionals across various careers. With this in mind, this survey provides an extensive examination of copyright infringement as it pertains to generative AI, aiming to stay abreast of the latest developments and open problems. Specifically, it will first outline methods of detecting copyright infringement in mediums such as text, image, and video. Next, it will delve an exploration of existing techniques aimed at safeguarding copyrighted works from generative models. Furthermore, this survey will discuss resources and tools for users to evaluate copyright violations. Finally, insights into ongoing regulations and proposals for AI will be explored and compared. Through combining these disciplines, the implications of AI-driven content and copyright are thoroughly illustrated and brought into question.
Related papers
- Can Watermarking Large Language Models Prevent Copyrighted Text Generation and Hide Training Data? [62.72729485995075]
We investigate the effectiveness of watermarking as a deterrent against the generation of copyrighted texts.
We find that watermarking adversely affects the success rate of Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs)
We propose an adaptive technique to improve the success rate of a recent MIA under watermarking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-24T16:53:09Z) - Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Models [100.38129820325497]
Language models (LMs) derive their capabilities from extensive training on diverse data, including potentially copyrighted material.
This paper introduces the first evaluation of the feasibility and side effects of copyright takedowns for LMs.
We examine several strategies, including adding system prompts, decoding-time filtering interventions, and unlearning approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T18:09:46Z) - Evaluating and Mitigating IP Infringement in Visual Generative AI [54.24196167576133]
State-of-the-art visual generative models can generate content that bears a striking resemblance to characters protected by intellectual property rights.
This happens when the input prompt contains the character's name or even just descriptive details about their characteristics.
We develop a revised generation paradigm that can identify potentially infringing generated content and prevent IP infringement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T06:14:18Z) - U Can't Gen This? A Survey of Intellectual Property Protection Methods for Data in Generative AI [4.627725143147341]
We study the concerns regarding the intellectual property rights of training data.
We focus on the properties of generative models that enable misuse leading to potential IP violations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-22T09:09:21Z) - ©Plug-in Authorization for Human Content Copyright Protection in Text-to-Image Model [71.47762442337948]
State-of-the-art models create high-quality content without crediting original creators.
We propose the copyright Plug-in Authorization framework, introducing three operations: addition, extraction, and combination.
Extraction allows creators to reclaim copyright from infringing models, and combination enables users to merge different copyright plug-ins.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-18T07:48:00Z) - AI Royalties -- an IP Framework to Compensate Artists & IP Holders for AI-Generated Content [3.4410934027154996]
This article investigates how AI-generated content can disrupt central revenue streams of the creative industries.
It reviews the IP and copyright questions related to the input and output of generative AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-05T15:35:08Z) - Not All Similarities Are Created Equal: Leveraging Data-Driven Biases to Inform GenAI Copyright Disputes [20.237329910319293]
This paper introduces a novel approach that leverages the learning capacity of GenAI models for copyright legal analysis.
We propose a data-driven approach to identify the genericity of works created by GenAI.
The potential implications of measuring expressive genericity for copyright law are profound.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-26T13:32:32Z) - Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspective [58.84343394349887]
Generative AI has witnessed rapid advancement in recent years, expanding their capabilities to create synthesized content such as text, images, audio, and code.
The high fidelity and authenticity of contents generated by these Deep Generative Models (DGMs) have sparked significant copyright concerns.
This work delves into this issue by providing a comprehensive overview of copyright protection from a technical perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-04T04:00:33Z) - A Dataset and Benchmark for Copyright Infringement Unlearning from Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [52.49582606341111]
Copyright law confers creators the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and monetize their creative works.
Recent progress in text-to-image generation has introduced formidable challenges to copyright enforcement.
We introduce a novel pipeline that harmonizes CLIP, ChatGPT, and diffusion models to curate a dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-04T11:14:01Z) - Generative AI and US Intellectual Property Law [0.0]
It remains to be seen whether human content creators can retain their intellectual property rights against generative AI software.
Early signs from various courts are mixed as to whether and to what degree the results generated by AI models meet the legal standards of infringement under existing law.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-27T17:36:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.