Towards Practical Tool Usage for Continually Learning LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09339v1
• Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 19:45:47 GMT
• Title: Towards Practical Tool Usage for Continually Learning LLMs
• Authors: Jerry Huang, Prasanna Parthasarathi, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh, Sarath Chandar,
• Abstract summary: Large language models show an innate skill for solving language based tasks. But their knowledge, stored directly within their parameters, remains static in time. Tool use helps by offloading work to systems that the LLM can access through an interface. But LLMs that use them still must adapt to nonstationary environments for prolonged use.
• Score: 28.62382804829694
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) show an innate skill for solving language based tasks. But insights have suggested an inability to adjust for information or task-solving skills becoming outdated, as their knowledge, stored directly within their parameters, remains static in time. Tool use helps by offloading work to systems that the LLM can access through an interface, but LLMs that use them still must adapt to nonstationary environments for prolonged use, as new tools can emerge and existing tools can change. Nevertheless, tools require less specialized knowledge, therefore we hypothesize they are better suited for continual learning (CL) as they rely less on parametric memory for solving tasks and instead focus on learning when to apply pre-defined tools. To verify this, we develop a synthetic benchmark and follow this by aggregating existing NLP tasks to form a more realistic testing scenario. While we demonstrate scaling model size is not a solution, regardless of tool usage, continual learning techniques can enable tool LLMs to both adapt faster while forgetting less, highlighting their potential as continual learners.

Related papers

• Learning to Ask: When LLMs Meet Unclear Instruction [49.256630152684764]
  Large language models (LLMs) can leverage external tools for addressing a range of tasks unattainable through language skills alone. We evaluate the performance of LLMs tool-use under imperfect instructions, analyze the error patterns, and build a challenging tool-use benchmark called Noisy ToolBench. We propose a novel framework, Ask-when-Needed (AwN), which prompts LLMs to ask questions to users whenever they encounter obstacles due to unclear instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-31T23:06:12Z)
• WTU-EVAL: A Whether-or-Not Tool Usage Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models [31.742620965039517]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in NLP tasks, but still need external tools to extend their ability. We introduce the Whether-or-not tool usage Evaluation benchmark (WTU-Eval) to assess LLMs with eleven datasets. The results of eight LLMs on WTU-Eval reveal that LLMs frequently struggle to determine tool use in general datasets. Fine-tuning Llama2-7B results in a 14% average performance improvement and a 16.8% decrease in incorrect tool usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T12:07:38Z)
• Can Tool-augmented Large Language Models be Aware of Incomplete Conditions? [33.74511128798095]
  This study examines whether large language models can identify incomplete conditions and appropriately determine when to refrain from using tools. We confirm that most LLMs are challenged to identify the additional information required to utilize specific tools and the absence of appropriate tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T06:28:06Z)
• Chain of Tools: Large Language Model is an Automatic Multi-tool Learner [54.992464510992605]
  Automatic Tool Chain (ATC) is a framework that enables the large language models (LLMs) to act as a multi-tool user. To scale up the scope of the tools, we next propose a black-box probing method. For a comprehensive evaluation, we build a challenging benchmark named ToolFlow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T11:40:58Z)
• LLMs in the Imaginarium: Tool Learning through Simulated Trial and Error [54.954211216847135]
  Existing large language models (LLMs) only reach a correctness rate in the range of 30% to 60%. We propose a biologically inspired method for tool-augmented LLMs, simulated trial and error (STE) STE orchestrates three key mechanisms for successful tool use behaviors in the biological system: trial and error, imagination, and memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T18:50:51Z)
• Look Before You Leap: Towards Decision-Aware and Generalizable Tool-Usage for Large Language Models [26.28459880766842]
  We propose a decision-aware and generalizable tool-usage framework (DEER) Specifically, we first construct the tool-usage samples with multiple decision branches via an automatic generation pipeline. Our proposed DEER is effective and significantly outperforms baselines across various datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T16:11:03Z)
• EASYTOOL: Enhancing LLM-based Agents with Concise Tool Instruction [56.02100384015907]
  EasyTool is a framework transforming diverse and lengthy tool documentation into a unified and concise tool instruction. It can significantly reduce token consumption and improve the performance of tool utilization in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T15:45:11Z)
• MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Use [82.24774504584066]
  Large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention due to their impressive natural language processing (NLP) capabilities. We introduce MetaTool, a benchmark designed to evaluate whether LLMs have tool usage awareness and can correctly choose tools. We conduct experiments involving eight popular LLMs and find that the majority of them still struggle to effectively select tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T19:39:26Z)
• Large Language Models as Tool Makers [85.00361145117293]
  We introduce a closed-loop framework, referred to as LLMs A s Tool Makers (LATM), where LLMs create their own reusable tools for problem-solving. Our approach consists of two phases: 1) tool making: an LLM acts as the tool maker that crafts tools for a set of tasks. 2) tool using: another LLM acts as the tool user, which applies the tool built by the tool maker for problem-solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T17:50:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.