Synergising Human-like Responses and Machine Intelligence for Planning in Disaster Response

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09877v2
• Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 10:19:38 GMT
• Title: Synergising Human-like Responses and Machine Intelligence for Planning in Disaster Response
• Authors: Savvas Papaioannou, Panayiotis Kolios, Christos G. Panayiotou, Marios M. Polycarpou,
• Abstract summary: We propose an attention-based cognitive architecture inspired by Dual Process Theory (DPT) This framework integrates, in an online fashion, rapid yet (human-like) responses with the slow but optimized planning capabilities of machine intelligence.
• Score: 10.294618771570985
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the rapidly changing environments of disaster response, planning and decision-making for autonomous agents involve complex and interdependent choices. Although recent advancements have improved traditional artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, they often struggle in such settings, particularly when applied to agents operating outside their well-defined training parameters. To address these challenges, we propose an attention-based cognitive architecture inspired by Dual Process Theory (DPT). This framework integrates, in an online fashion, rapid yet heuristic (human-like) responses (System 1) with the slow but optimized planning capabilities of machine intelligence (System 2). We illustrate how a supervisory controller can dynamically determine in real-time the engagement of either system to optimize mission objectives by assessing their performance across a number of distinct attributes. Evaluated for trajectory planning in dynamic environments, our framework demonstrates that this synergistic integration effectively manages complex tasks by optimizing multiple mission objectives.

Related papers

• Agent-Oriented Planning in Multi-Agent Systems [54.429028104022066]
  We propose a novel framework for agent-oriented planning in multi-agent systems, leveraging a fast task decomposition and allocation process. We integrate a feedback loop into the proposed framework to further enhance the effectiveness and robustness of such a problem-solving process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T04:07:51Z)
• A Meta-Engine Framework for Interleaved Task and Motion Planning using Topological Refinements [51.54559117314768]
  Task And Motion Planning (TAMP) is the problem of finding a solution to an automated planning problem. We propose a general and open-source framework for modeling and benchmarking TAMP problems. We introduce an innovative meta-technique to solve TAMP problems involving moving agents and multiple task-state-dependent obstacles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-11T14:57:57Z)
• Online Pareto-Optimal Decision-Making for Complex Tasks using Active Inference [14.470714123175972]
  This paper introduces a novel framework for multi-objective reinforcement learning. It ensures safe task execution, optimize trade-offs between objectives, and adheres to user preferences. Case studies and benchmarks on both manipulation and mobile robots show that our framework outperforms other methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T18:03:45Z)
• Efficient Adaptation in Mixed-Motive Environments via Hierarchical Opponent Modeling and Planning [51.52387511006586]
  We propose Hierarchical Opponent modeling and Planning (HOP), a novel multi-agent decision-making algorithm. HOP is hierarchically composed of two modules: an opponent modeling module that infers others' goals and learns corresponding goal-conditioned policies. HOP exhibits superior few-shot adaptation capabilities when interacting with various unseen agents, and excels in self-play scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T08:48:06Z)
• Efficient Orchestrated AI Workflows Execution on Scale-out Spatial Architecture [17.516934379812994]
  We present "Orchestrated AIs," an approach that integrates various tasks with logic-driven decisions into dynamic, sophisticated AIs. We find that the intrinsic Dual Dynamicity of Orchestrated AIs can be effectively represented using the Orchestrated spatial Graph. Our evaluations demonstrate that significantly outperforms traditional architectures in handling the dynamic demands of Orchestrated AIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T14:09:31Z)
• Interactive Autonomous Navigation with Internal State Inference and Interactivity Estimation [58.21683603243387]
  We propose three auxiliary tasks with relational-temporal reasoning and integrate them into the standard Deep Learning framework. These auxiliary tasks provide additional supervision signals to infer the behavior patterns other interactive agents. Our approach achieves robust and state-of-the-art performance in terms of standard evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T18:57:42Z)
• CoPAL: Corrective Planning of Robot Actions with Large Language Models [8.209152055117283]
  We propose a system architecture that orchestrates a seamless interplay between cognitive levels, encompassing reasoning, planning, and motion generation. At its core lies a novel replanning strategy that handles physically grounded, logical, and semantic errors in the generated plans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T07:39:42Z)
• RED: A Systematic Real-Time Scheduling Approach for Robotic Environmental Dynamics [11.38746414146899]
  We introduce RED, a systematic real-time scheduling approach designed to support multi-task deep neural network workloads in resource-limited robotic systems. It is designed to adaptively manage the Robotic Environmental Dynamics (RED) while adhering to real-time constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T15:04:08Z)
• Optimal task and motion planning and execution for human-robot multi-agent systems in dynamic environments [54.39292848359306]
  We propose a combined task and motion planning approach to optimize sequencing, assignment, and execution of tasks. The framework relies on decoupling tasks and actions, where an action is one possible geometric realization of a symbolic task. We demonstrate the approach effectiveness in a collaborative manufacturing scenario, in which a robotic arm and a human worker shall assemble a mosaic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T01:50:45Z)
• Planning-oriented Autonomous Driving [60.93767791255728]
  We argue that a favorable framework should be devised and optimized in pursuit of the ultimate goal, i.e., planning of the self-driving car. We introduce Unified Autonomous Driving (UniAD), a comprehensive framework that incorporates full-stack driving tasks in one network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T10:47:53Z)
• Near-Optimal Reactive Synthesis Incorporating Runtime Information [28.25296947005914]
  We consider the problem of optimal reactive synthesis - compute a strategy that satisfies a mission specification in a dynamic environment. We incorporate task-critical information, that is only available at runtime, into the strategy synthesis in order to improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-31T14:41:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.