Debunking Robot Rights Metaphysically, Ethically, and Legally

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10072v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:23:58 GMT
• Title: Debunking Robot Rights Metaphysically, Ethically, and Legally
• Authors: Abeba Birhane, Jelle van Dijk, Frank Pasquale,
• Abstract summary: We argue that machines are not the kinds of things that may be denied or granted rights. From a legal perspective, the best analogy to robot rights is not human rights but corporate rights.
• Score: 0.10241134756773229
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In this work we challenge arguments for robot rights on metaphysical, ethical and legal grounds. Metaphysically, we argue that machines are not the kinds of things that may be denied or granted rights. Building on theories of phenomenology and post-Cartesian approaches to cognitive science, we ground our position in the lived reality of actual humans in an increasingly ubiquitously connected, controlled, digitized, and surveilled society. Ethically, we argue that, given machines current and potential harms to the most marginalized in society, limits on (rather than rights for) machines should be at the centre of current AI ethics debate. From a legal perspective, the best analogy to robot rights is not human rights but corporate rights, a highly controversial concept whose most important effect has been the undermining of worker, consumer, and voter rights by advancing the power of capital to exercise outsized influence on politics and law. The idea of robot rights, we conclude, acts as a smoke screen, allowing theorists and futurists to fantasize about benevolently sentient machines with unalterable needs and desires protected by law. While such fantasies have motivated fascinating fiction and art, once they influence legal theory and practice articulating the scope of rights claims, they threaten to immunize from legal accountability the current AI and robotics that is fuelling surveillance capitalism, accelerating environmental destruction, and entrenching injustice and human suffering.

Related papers

• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences. First, it is not sustainable, as its compute demands increase faster than model performance, leading to unreasonable economic requirements and a disproportionate environmental footprint. Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• The Ethics of Automating Legal Actors [58.81546227716182]
  We argue that automating the role of the judge raises difficult ethical challenges, in particular for common law legal systems. Our argument follows from the social role of the judge in actively shaping the law, rather than merely applying it. Even in the case the models could achieve human-level capabilities, there would still be remaining ethical concerns inherent in the automation of the legal process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T13:48:46Z)
• Training Is Everything: Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, and Fair Training [9.653656920225858]
  Authors: Companies that use such content to train their AI engine often believe such usage should be considered "fair use" Authors: Copyright owners, as well as their supporters, consider the incorporation of copyrighted works into training sets for AI to constitute misappropriation of owners' intellectual property. We identify both strong and spurious arguments on both sides of this debate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T04:01:00Z)
• Artificial Influence: An Analysis Of AI-Driven Persuasion [0.0]
  We warn that ubiquitous highlypersuasive AI systems could alter our information environment so significantly so as to contribute to a loss of human control of our own future. We conclude that none of these solutions will be airtight, and that individuals and governments will need to take active steps to guard against the most pernicious effects of persuasive AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T16:05:11Z)
• Aligning Robot and Human Representations [50.070982136315784]
  We argue that current representation learning approaches in robotics should be studied from the perspective of how well they accomplish the objective of representation alignment. We mathematically define the problem, identify its key desiderata, and situate current methods within this formalism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T18:59:55Z)
• When to Make Exceptions: Exploring Language Models as Accounts of Human Moral Judgment [96.77970239683475]
  AI systems need to be able to understand, interpret and predict human moral judgments and decisions. A central challenge for AI safety is capturing the flexibility of the human moral mind. We present a novel challenge set consisting of rule-breaking question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T09:04:27Z)
• The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS-TRAITS [64.77385130665128]
  The aim of this workshop is to foster the exchange of insights on past and ongoing research towards effective and long-lasting collaborations between humans and robots. We particularly focus on AI techniques required to implement autonomous and proactive interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T11:12:45Z)
• Reasonable Machines: A Research Manifesto [0.0]
  A sound ecosystem of trust requires ways for autonomously justify their actions. Building on social reasoning models such as moral and legal philosophy. Enabling normative communication creates trust and opens new dimensions of AI application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-14T08:51:33Z)
• Collecting the Public Perception of AI and Robot Rights [10.791267046450077]
  The European Parliament proposed advanced robots could be granted "electronic personalities" This paper collects online users' first impressions of 11 possible rights that could be granted to autonomous electronic agents of the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T05:35:29Z)
• Hacia los Comit\'es de \'Etica en Inteligencia Artificial [68.8204255655161]
  It is priority to create the rules and specialized organizations that can oversight the following of such rules. This work proposes the creation, at the universities, of Ethical Committees or Commissions specialized on Artificial Intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-11T23:48:31Z)
• Robot Rights? Let's Talk about Human Welfare Instead [0.0]
  We argue that robots, as artifacts emerging out of and mediating human being, are the kinds of things that could be granted rights in the first place. We conclude that, if human being is our starting point and human welfare is the primary concern, the negative impacts emerging from machinic systems remain the most pressing ethical discussion in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-14T20:54:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.