Would You Trust an AI Doctor? Building Reliable Medical Predictions with Kernel Dropout Uncertainty

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10483v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:43:26 GMT
• Title: Would You Trust an AI Doctor? Building Reliable Medical Predictions with Kernel Dropout Uncertainty
• Authors: Ubaid Azam, Imran Razzak, Shelly Vishwakarma, Hakim Hacid, Dell Zhang, Shoaib Jameel,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a Bayesian Monte Carlo Dropout model with kernel modelling to enhance reliability on small medical datasets. We demonstrate significant improvements in reliability, even with limited data, offering a promising step towards building trust in AI-driven medical predictions.
• Score: 14.672477787408887
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The growing capabilities of AI raise questions about their trustworthiness in healthcare, particularly due to opaque decision-making and limited data availability. This paper proposes a novel approach to address these challenges, introducing a Bayesian Monte Carlo Dropout model with kernel modelling. Our model is designed to enhance reliability on small medical datasets, a crucial barrier to the wider adoption of AI in healthcare. This model leverages existing language models for improved effectiveness and seamlessly integrates with current workflows. We demonstrate significant improvements in reliability, even with limited data, offering a promising step towards building trust in AI-driven medical predictions and unlocking its potential to improve patient care.

Related papers

• Which Client is Reliable?: A Reliable and Personalized Prompt-based Federated Learning for Medical Image Question Answering [51.26412822853409]
  We present a novel personalized federated learning (pFL) method for medical visual question answering (VQA) models. Our method introduces learnable prompts into a Transformer architecture to efficiently train it on diverse medical datasets without massive computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T00:31:17Z)
• Detecting Bias and Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Large Language Models for Healthcare [0.2302001830524133]
  Biased AI-generated medical advice and misdiagnoses can jeopardize patient safety. This study introduces new resources designed to promote ethical and precise AI in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T06:00:05Z)
• Bayesian Kolmogorov Arnold Networks (Bayesian_KANs): A Probabilistic Approach to Enhance Accuracy and Interpretability [1.90365714903665]
  This study presents a novel framework called Bayesian Kolmogorov Arnold Networks (BKANs) BKANs combines the expressive capacity of Kolmogorov Arnold Networks with Bayesian inference. Our method provides useful insights into prediction confidence and decision boundaries and outperforms traditional deep learning models in terms of prediction accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T10:38:34Z)
• Integrating ChatGPT into Secure Hospital Networks: A Case Study on Improving Radiology Report Analysis [1.3624495460189863]
  This study demonstrates the first in-hospital adaptation of a cloud-based AI, similar to ChatGPT, into a secure model for analyzing radiology reports. By employing a unique sentence-level knowledge distillation method through contrastive learning, we achieve over 95% accuracy in detecting anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:02:24Z)
• Leveraging Generative AI for Clinical Evidence Summarization Needs to Ensure Trustworthiness [47.51360338851017]
  Evidence-based medicine promises to improve the quality of healthcare by empowering medical decisions and practices with the best available evidence. The rapid growth of medical evidence, which can be obtained from various sources, poses a challenge in collecting, appraising, and synthesizing the evidential information. Recent advancements in generative AI, exemplified by large language models, hold promise in facilitating the arduous task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-19T03:29:45Z)
• MedDiffusion: Boosting Health Risk Prediction via Diffusion-based Data Augmentation [58.93221876843639]
  This paper introduces a novel, end-to-end diffusion-based risk prediction model, named MedDiffusion. It enhances risk prediction performance by creating synthetic patient data during training to enlarge sample space. It discerns hidden relationships between patient visits using a step-wise attention mechanism, enabling the model to automatically retain the most vital information for generating high-quality data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T01:36:30Z)
• Advancing COVID-19 Diagnosis with Privacy-Preserving Collaboration in Artificial Intelligence [79.038671794961]
  We launch the Unified CT-COVID AI Diagnostic Initiative (UCADI), where the AI model can be distributedly trained and independently executed at each host institution. Our study is based on 9,573 chest computed tomography scans (CTs) from 3,336 patients collected from 23 hospitals located in China and the UK.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T00:43:41Z)
• MedPerf: Open Benchmarking Platform for Medical Artificial Intelligence using Federated Evaluation [110.31526448744096]
  We argue that unlocking this potential requires a systematic way to measure the performance of medical AI models on large-scale heterogeneous data. We are building MedPerf, an open framework for benchmarking machine learning in the medical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T18:09:41Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.