Self-Supervised Visual Preference Alignment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10501v2
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 11:36:47 GMT
• Title: Self-Supervised Visual Preference Alignment
• Authors: Ke Zhu, Zheng Ge, Liang Zhao, Xiangyu Zhang,
• Abstract summary: This paper makes the first attempt towards unsupervised preference alignment in Vision-Language Models (VLMs). We generate chosen and rejected responses with regard to the original and augmented image pairs, and conduct preference alignment with direct preference optimization. It is based on a core idea: properly designed augmentation to the image input will induce VLM to generate false but hard negative responses, which helps the model to learn from and produce more robust and powerful answers.
• Score: 21.552415796397206
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper makes the first attempt towards unsupervised preference alignment in Vision-Language Models (VLMs). We generate chosen and rejected responses with regard to the original and augmented image pairs, and conduct preference alignment with direct preference optimization. It is based on a core idea: properly designed augmentation to the image input will induce VLM to generate false but hard negative responses, which helps the model to learn from and produce more robust and powerful answers. The whole pipeline no longer hinges on supervision from GPT-4 or human involvement during alignment, and is highly efficient with few lines of code. With only 8k randomly sampled unsupervised data, it achieves 90\% relative score to GPT-4 on complex reasoning in LLaVA-Bench, and improves LLaVA-7B/13B by 6.7\%/5.6\% score on complex multi-modal benchmark MM-Vet. Visualizations shows its improved ability to align with user-intentions. A series of ablations are firmly conducted to reveal the latent mechanism of the approach, which also indicates its potential towards further scaling. Code are available in https://github.com/Kevinz-code/SeVa.

Related papers

• GrAInS: Gradient-based Attribution for Inference-Time Steering of LLMs and VLMs [56.93583799109029]
  GrAInS is an inference-time steering approach that operates across both language-only and vision-language models and tasks.<n>During inference, GrAInS hidden activations at transformer layers guided by token-level attribution signals, and normalizes activations to preserve representational scale.<n>It consistently outperforms both fine-tuning and existing steering baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T02:34:13Z)
• SHAPE : Self-Improved Visual Preference Alignment by Iteratively Generating Holistic Winner [35.843587407696006]
  Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) increasingly rely on preference alignment to ensure reliability. We present projectname, a self-supervised framework capable of transforming the already abundant supervised text-image pairs into holistic preference triplets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T08:33:11Z)
• S*: Test Time Scaling for Code Generation [55.11863577956177]
  We propose S*, the first hybrid test-time scaling framework for code generation. S* substantially improves the coverage and selection accuracy of generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T09:18:53Z)
• MM-RLHF: The Next Step Forward in Multimodal LLM Alignment [59.536850459059856]
  We introduce MM-RLHF, a dataset containing $mathbf120k$ fine-grained, human-annotated preference comparison pairs. We propose several key innovations to improve the quality of reward models and the efficiency of alignment algorithms. Our approach is rigorously evaluated across $mathbf10$ distinct dimensions and $mathbf27$ benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T18:59:51Z)
• EACO: Enhancing Alignment in Multimodal LLMs via Critical Observation [58.546205554954454]
  We propose Enhancing Alignment in MLLMs via Critical Observation (EACO) EACO aligns MLLMs by self-generated preference data using only 5k images economically. EACO reduces the overall hallucinations by 65.6% on HallusionBench and improves the reasoning ability by 21.8% on MME-Cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T09:59:47Z)
• SelfCodeAlign: Self-Alignment for Code Generation [15.23960029671979]
  SelfCodeAlign is the first fully transparent and permissive pipeline for self-aligning code language models (LLMs) It first extracts diverse coding concepts from high-quality seed snippets to generate new tasks. It then samples multiple responses per task, pairs each with test cases, and validates them in a sandbox environment. Finetuning on this dataset leads to a model that achieves a 67.1 pass@1 on HumanEval+, surpassing CodeLlama-70B-Instruct despite being ten times smaller.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T17:55:13Z)
• Modality-Fair Preference Optimization for Trustworthy MLLM Alignment [11.796170286878056]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is effective for aligning large language models (LLMs) It often favors text over image information, leading to unreliable outputs and visual hallucinations. We propose Modality-Fair Preference Optimization (MFPO) to balance text and image preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T08:56:52Z)
• VLFeedback: A Large-Scale AI Feedback Dataset for Large Vision-Language Models Alignment [55.7956150385255]
  We investigate the efficacy of AI feedback to scale supervision for aligning vision-language models. We introduce VLFeedback, the first large-scale vision-language feedback dataset. We train Silkie, an LVLM fine-tuned via direct preference optimization on VLFeedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:56:47Z)
• RLAIF-V: Aligning MLLMs through Open-Source AI Feedback for Super GPT-4V Trustworthiness [94.03511733306296]
  We introduce RLAIF-V, a framework that aligns MLLMs in a fully open-source paradigm for super GPT-4V trustworthiness. RLAIF-V maximally exploits the open-source feedback from two perspectives, including high-quality feedback data and online feedback learning algorithm. Experiments show that RLAIF-V substantially enhances the trustworthiness of models without sacrificing performance on other tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T14:37:01Z)
• Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment [75.83359213697854]
  Recent advancements suggest that directly working with preference probabilities can yield a more accurate reflection of human preferences. We propose a self-play-based method for language model alignment, which treats the problem as a constant-sum two-player game. Our approach, dubbed Self-Play Preference Optimization (SPPO), utilizes iterative policy updates to provably approximate the Nash equilibrium.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T17:59:20Z)
• Aligning Modalities in Vision Large Language Models via Preference Fine-tuning [67.62925151837675]
  In this work, we frame the hallucination problem as an alignment issue, tackle it with preference tuning. Specifically, we propose POVID to generate feedback data with AI models. We use ground-truth instructions as the preferred response and a two-stage approach to generate dispreferred data. In experiments across broad benchmarks, we show that we can not only reduce hallucinations, but improve model performance across standard benchmarks, outperforming prior approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T00:56:16Z)
• Silkie: Preference Distillation for Large Visual Language Models [56.10697821410489]
  This paper explores preference distillation for large vision language models (LVLMs) We first build a vision-language feedback dataset utilizing AI annotation. We adopt GPT-4V to assess the generated outputs regarding helpfulness, visual faithfulness, and ethical considerations. The resulting model Silkie, achieves 6.9% and 9.5% relative improvement on the MME benchmark regarding the perception and cognition capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T09:44:27Z)
• Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment [59.03530095974505]
  We aim to produce a smaller language model that is aligned to user intent. Previous research has shown that applying supervised fine-tuning (dSFT) on larger models significantly improves task accuracy. We apply distilled direct preference optimization (dDPO) to learn a chat model with significantly improved intent alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T19:25:16Z)
• SupCL-Seq: Supervised Contrastive Learning for Downstream Optimized Sequence Representations [4.392337343771302]
  This paper introduces SupCL-Seq, which extends the supervised contrastive learning from computer vision to the optimization of sequence representations in NLP. We show that SupCL-Seq leads to large gains in many sequence classification tasks on the GLUE benchmark compared to a standard BERTbase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-15T16:51:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.