Enhancing Q&A with Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning and Iterative Reasoning: A Comparative Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11792v2
• Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:28:16 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Q&A with Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning and Iterative Reasoning: A Comparative Study
• Authors: Zooey Nguyen, Anthony Annunziata, Vinh Luong, Sang Dinh, Quynh Le, Anh Hai Ha, Chanh Le, Hong An Phan, Shruti Raghavan, Christopher Nguyen,
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates the impact of domain-specific model fine-tuning and of reasoning mechanisms on the performance of question-answering (Q&A) systems powered by large language models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Using the FinanceBench SEC financial filings dataset, we observe that, for RAG, combining a fine-tuned embedding model with a fine-tuned LLM achieves better accuracy than generic models. We propose a structured technical design space capturing major technical components of Q&A AI, and provide recommendations for making high-impact technical choices for such components.
• Score: 0.3932300766934226
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates the impact of domain-specific model fine-tuning and of reasoning mechanisms on the performance of question-answering (Q&A) systems powered by large language models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Using the FinanceBench SEC financial filings dataset, we observe that, for RAG, combining a fine-tuned embedding model with a fine-tuned LLM achieves better accuracy than generic models, with relatively greater gains attributable to fine-tuned embedding models. Additionally, employing reasoning iterations on top of RAG delivers an even bigger jump in performance, enabling the Q&A systems to get closer to human-expert quality. We discuss the implications of such findings, propose a structured technical design space capturing major technical components of Q&A AI, and provide recommendations for making high-impact technical choices for such components. We plan to follow up on this work with actionable guides for AI teams and further investigations into the impact of domain-specific augmentation in RAG and into agentic AI capabilities such as advanced planning and reasoning.

Related papers

• A Survey on Post-training of Large Language Models [185.51013463503946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed natural language processing, making them indispensable across domains ranging from conversational systems to scientific exploration. These challenges necessitate advanced post-training language models (PoLMs) to address shortcomings, such as restricted reasoning capacities, ethical uncertainties, and suboptimal domain-specific performance. This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of PoLMs, systematically tracing their evolution across five core paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T05:41:42Z)
• A Survey of Query Optimization in Large Language Models [10.255235456427037]
  RAG mitigates the limitations of Large Language Models by dynamically retrieving and leveraging up-to-date relevant information. QO has emerged as a critical element, playing a pivotal role in determining the effectiveness of RAG's retrieval stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T13:26:04Z)
• A Survey on Inference Optimization Techniques for Mixture of Experts Models [50.40325411764262]
  Large-scale Mixture of Experts (MoE) models offer enhanced model capacity and computational efficiency through conditional computation. deploying and running inference on these models presents significant challenges in computational resources, latency, and energy efficiency. This survey analyzes optimization techniques for MoE models across the entire system stack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T14:11:15Z)
• Agentic AI-Driven Technical Troubleshooting for Enterprise Systems: A Novel Weighted Retrieval-Augmented Generation Paradigm [0.0]
  This paper presents a novel agentic AI solution built on a Weighted Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Framework tailored for enterprise technical troubleshooting. By dynamically weighting retrieval sources such as product manuals, internal knowledge bases, FAQ, and troubleshooting guides, the framework prioritizes the most relevant data. Preliminary evaluations on large enterprise datasets demonstrate the framework's efficacy in improving troubleshooting accuracy, reducing resolution times, and adapting to varied technical challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T17:32:38Z)
• Optimizing Sequential Recommendation Models with Scaling Laws and Approximate Entropy [104.48511402784763]
  Performance Law for SR models aims to theoretically investigate and model the relationship between model performance and data quality. We propose Approximate Entropy (ApEn) to assess data quality, presenting a more nuanced approach compared to traditional data quantity metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-30T10:56:30Z)
• Enhancing Question Answering Precision with Optimized Vector Retrieval and Instructions [1.2425910171551517]
  Question-answering (QA) is an important application of Information Retrieval (IR) and language models. We propose an innovative approach to improve QA task performances by integrating optimized vector retrievals and instruction methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T21:14:04Z)
• Aggregated Knowledge Model: Enhancing Domain-Specific QA with Fine-Tuned and Retrieval-Augmented Generation Models [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel approach to enhancing closed-domain Question Answering (QA) systems. It focuses on the specific needs of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBL) Science Information Technology (ScienceIT) domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T00:49:46Z)
• Leveraging the Domain Adaptation of Retrieval Augmented Generation Models for Question Answering and Reducing Hallucination [3.879723687090678]
  Retrieval Augmented Generation Model stands out to be highly effective on downstream applications like Question Answering. Recently, RAG-end2end model further optimized the architecture and achieved notable performance improvements on domain adaptation. In this paper, we investigated the performance of diverse RAG and RAG-like architectures through domain adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T11:32:46Z)
• On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision Making [52.128546842746246]
  Large pretrained models are showing increasingly better performance in reasoning and planning tasks. We evaluate their ability to produce decision-making policies, either directly, by generating actions, or indirectly. In environments with unfamiliar dynamics, we explore how fine-tuning LLMs with synthetic data can significantly improve their reward modeling capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T03:12:57Z)
• Reward-RAG: Enhancing RAG with Reward Driven Supervision [43.66966457772646]
  We introduce Reward-RAG, a novel approach designed to enhance the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) model through Reward-Driven Supervision. Unlike previous RAG methodologies, our method adapts retrieval information to specific domains by employing CriticGPT to train a dedicated reward model. This reward model generates synthesized datasets for fine-tuning the RAG, aligning its outputs more closely with human preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T15:26:50Z)
• A Knowledge-Centric Benchmarking Framework and Empirical Study for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [4.359511178431438]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances generative models by integrating retrieval mechanisms. Despite its advantages, RAG encounters significant challenges, particularly in effectively handling real-world queries. This paper proposes a novel RAG benchmark designed to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T03:31:37Z)
• KaPQA: Knowledge-Augmented Product Question-Answering [59.096607961704656]
  We introduce two product question-answering (QA) datasets focused on Adobe Acrobat and Photoshop products. We also propose a novel knowledge-driven RAG-QA framework to enhance the performance of the models in the product QA task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T22:14:56Z)
• GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models [56.63218531256961]
  We introduce GenBench, a benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models. GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies. We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T08:01:05Z)
• Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI [64.59151650272477]
  We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors. This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-04T17:44:58Z)
• Refined Mechanism Design for Approximately Structured Priors via Active Regression [50.71772232237571]
  We consider the problem of a revenue-maximizing seller with a large number of items for sale to $n$ strategic bidders. It is well-known that optimal and even approximately-optimal mechanisms for this setting are notoriously difficult to characterize or compute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T20:34:17Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.