Is Relevance Propagated from Retriever to Generator in RAG?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15025v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:21:46 GMT
- Title: Is Relevance Propagated from Retriever to Generator in RAG?
- Abstract summary: RAG is a framework for incorporating external knowledge, usually in the form of a set of documents retrieved from a collection.<n>We empirically investigate whether a RAG context comprised of topically relevant documents leads to improved downstream performance.
- Score: 21.82171240511567
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is a framework for incorporating external knowledge, usually in the form of a set of documents retrieved from a collection, as a part of a prompt to a large language model (LLM) to potentially improve the performance of a downstream task, such as question answering. Different from a standard retrieval task's objective of maximising the relevance of a set of top-ranked documents, a RAG system's objective is rather to maximise their total utility, where the utility of a document indicates whether including it as a part of the additional contextual information in an LLM prompt improves a downstream task. Existing studies investigate the role of the relevance of a RAG context for knowledge-intensive language tasks (KILT), where relevance essentially takes the form of answer containment. In contrast, in our work, relevance corresponds to that of topical overlap between a query and a document for an information seeking task. Specifically, we make use of an IR test collection to empirically investigate whether a RAG context comprised of topically relevant documents leads to improved downstream performance. Our experiments lead to the following findings: (a) there is a small positive correlation between relevance and utility; (b) this correlation decreases with increasing context sizes (higher values of k in k-shot); and (c) a more effective retrieval model generally leads to better downstream RAG performance.
Related papers
- NaviRAG: Towards Active Knowledge Navigation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [50.16741209529908]
NaviRAG is a novel framework that shifts from passive segment retrieval to active knowledge navigation.<n>We show that NaviRAG consistently improves both retrieval recall and end-to-end answer performance over conventional RAG baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T14:07:01Z) - Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage [89.58253972744531]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems combine document retrieval with a generative model to address complex information seeking tasks like report generation.<n>We investigate whether upstream retrieval metrics can serve as reliable early indicators of the final generated response's information coverage.<n>Our findings demonstrate strong correlations between coverage-based retrieval metrics and nugget coverage in generated responses at both topic and system levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-09T18:20:20Z) - Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z) - ReAG: Reasoning-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering [54.72902502486611]
ReAG is a Reasoning-Augmented Multimodal RAG approach that combines coarse- and fine-grained retrieval with a critic model that filters irrelevant passages.<n>ReAG significantly outperforms prior methods, improving answer accuracy and providing interpretable reasoning grounded in retrieved evidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T19:01:02Z) - Query Decomposition for RAG: Balancing Exploration-Exploitation [83.79639293409802]
RAG systems address complex user requests by decomposing them into subqueries, retrieving potentially relevant documents for each, and then aggregating them to generate an answer.<n>We formulate query decomposition and document retrieval in an exploitation-exploration setting, where retrieving one document at a time builds a belief about the utility of a given sub-queries.<n>Our main finding is that estimating document relevance using rank information and human judgments yields a 35% gain in document-level precision, 15% increase in alpha-nDCG, and better performance on the downstream task of long-form generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T13:37:11Z) - Controlled Retrieval-augmented Context Evaluation for Long-form RAG [58.14561461943611]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models by incorporating context retrieved from external knowledge sources.<n>We argue that providing a comprehensive retrieval-augmented context is important for long-form RAG tasks like report generation.<n>We introduce CRUX, a framework designed to directly assess retrieval-augmented contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-24T23:17:48Z) - Re-ranking the Context for Multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation [28.63893944806149]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge to generate a response within a context.
RAG systems face unique challenges: (i) the retrieval process may select irrelevant entries to user query (e.g., images, documents), and (ii) vision-language models or multi-modal language models like GPT-4o may hallucinate when processing these entries to generate RAG output.
We show that by using a more advanced relevancy measure, one can enhance the retrieval process by selecting more relevant pieces from the knowledge-base and eliminate
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-08T18:58:22Z) - Don't Do RAG: When Cache-Augmented Generation is All You Need for Knowledge Tasks [11.053340674721005]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has gained traction as a powerful approach for enhancing language models by integrating external knowledge sources.
This paper proposes an alternative paradigm, cache-augmented generation (CAG) that bypasses real-time retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-20T06:58:32Z) - Retriever-and-Memory: Towards Adaptive Note-Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation [72.70046559930555]
We propose a generic RAG approach called Adaptive Note-Enhanced RAG (Adaptive-Note) for complex QA tasks.
Specifically, Adaptive-Note introduces an overarching view of knowledge growth, iteratively gathering new information in the form of notes.
In addition, we employ an adaptive, note-based stop-exploration strategy to decide "what to retrieve and when to stop" to encourage sufficient knowledge exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T14:03:29Z) - Enhanced document retrieval with topic embeddings [0.0]
Document retrieval systems have experienced a revitalized interest with the advent of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
RAG architecture offers a lower hallucination rate than LLM-only applications.
We have devised a new vectorization method that takes into account the topic information of the document.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-19T22:01:45Z) - Iterative Utility Judgment Framework via LLMs Inspired by Relevance in Philosophy [66.95501113584541]
Utility and topical relevance are critical measures in information retrieval.
We propose an Iterative utiliTy judgmEnt fraMework to promote each step of the cycle of Retrieval-Augmented Generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T07:52:42Z) - DR-RAG: Applying Dynamic Document Relevance to Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question-Answering [4.364937306005719]
RAG has recently demonstrated the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the knowledge-intensive tasks such as Question-Answering (QA)
We have found that even though there is low relevance between some critical documents and query, it is possible to retrieve the remaining documents by combining parts of the documents with the query.
A two-stage retrieval framework called Dynamic-Relevant Retrieval-Augmented Generation (DR-RAG) is proposed to improve document retrieval recall and the accuracy of answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T15:15:33Z) - Blended RAG: Improving RAG (Retriever-Augmented Generation) Accuracy with Semantic Search and Hybrid Query-Based Retrievers [0.0]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a prevalent approach to infuse a private knowledge base of documents with Large Language Models (LLM) to build Generative Q&A (Question-Answering) systems.
We propose the 'Blended RAG' method of leveraging semantic search techniques, such as Vector indexes and Sparse indexes, blended with hybrid query strategies.
Our study achieves better retrieval results and sets new benchmarks for IR (Information Retrieval) datasets like NQ and TREC-COVID datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-22T17:13:46Z) - RAGGED: Towards Informed Design of Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems [51.171355532527365]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can significantly improve the performance of language models (LMs)
RAGGED is a framework for analyzing RAG configurations across various document-based question answering tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T02:26:31Z) - REAR: A Relevance-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Open-Domain Question Answering [115.72130322143275]
REAR is a RElevance-Aware Retrieval-augmented approach for open-domain question answering (QA)
We develop a novel architecture for LLM-based RAG systems, by incorporating a specially designed assessment module.
Experiments on four open-domain QA tasks show that REAR significantly outperforms previous a number of competitive RAG approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T13:22:51Z) - CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [49.16989035566899]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique that enhances the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge sources.
This paper constructs a large-scale and more comprehensive benchmark, and evaluates all the components of RAG systems in various RAG application scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T14:25:32Z) - Building Interpretable and Reliable Open Information Retriever for New
Domains Overnight [67.03842581848299]
Information retrieval is a critical component for many down-stream tasks such as open-domain question answering (QA)
We propose an information retrieval pipeline that uses entity/event linking model and query decomposition model to focus more accurately on different information units of the query.
We show that, while being more interpretable and reliable, our proposed pipeline significantly improves passage coverages and denotation accuracies across five IR and QA benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-09T07:47:17Z) - Augmenting Document Representations for Dense Retrieval with
Interpolation and Perturbation [49.940525611640346]
Document Augmentation for dense Retrieval (DAR) framework augments the representations of documents with their Dense Augmentation and perturbations.
We validate the performance of DAR on retrieval tasks with two benchmark datasets, showing that the proposed DAR significantly outperforms relevant baselines on the dense retrieval of both the labeled and unlabeled documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-15T09:07:38Z) - Generation-Augmented Retrieval for Open-domain Question Answering [134.27768711201202]
Generation-Augmented Retrieval (GAR) for answering open-domain questions.
We show that generating diverse contexts for a query is beneficial as fusing their results consistently yields better retrieval accuracy.
GAR achieves state-of-the-art performance on Natural Questions and TriviaQA datasets under the extractive QA setup when equipped with an extractive reader.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-17T23:08:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.