Insights into Alignment: Evaluating DPO and its Variants Across Multiple Tasks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14723v2
- Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:29:14 GMT
- Title: Insights into Alignment: Evaluating DPO and its Variants Across Multiple Tasks
- Authors: Amir Saeidi, Shivanshu Verma, Md Nayem Uddin, Chitta Baral,
- Abstract summary: This study evaluates Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and its variants for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences.
Our evaluation spans 13 benchmarks covering dialogue, reasoning, mathematical problem-solving, question answering, truthfulness, MT-Bench, Big Bench, and the Open LLM Leaderboard.
We find that alignment methods often achieve near optimal performance even with smaller subsets of training data.
- Score: 35.36615140853107
- License:
- Abstract: This study evaluates Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and its variants for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, testing three configurations: (1) with Supervised Fine Tuning (SFT), (2) without SFT, and (3) without SFT but using an instruction tuned model. We further investigate how training set size influences model performance. Our evaluation spans 13 benchmarks covering dialogue, reasoning, mathematical problem-solving, question answering, truthfulness, MT-Bench, Big Bench, and the Open LLM Leaderboard. We find that: (1) alignment methods often achieve near optimal performance even with smaller subsets of training data; (2) although they offer limited improvements on complex reasoning tasks, they enhance mathematical problem-solving; and (3) using an instruction tuned model improves truthfulness. These insights highlight the conditions under which alignment methods excel, as well as their limitations.
Related papers
- Teaching LLMs According to Their Aptitude: Adaptive Reasoning for Mathematical Problem Solving [55.895917967408586]
Existing approaches to mathematical reasoning with large language models rely on Chain-of-Thought (CoT) for generalizability or Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) for precise computation.
We propose TATA (Teaching LLMs According to Their Aptitude), an adaptive framework that enables LLMs to personalize their reasoning strategy spontaneously.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T16:56:23Z) - A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following [83.71180850955679]
We use a novel synthetic data generation pipeline to generate 48,000 instruction unique-following prompts.
With our synthetic prompts, we use two preference dataset curation methods - rejection sampling (RS) and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)
Experiments reveal that shared prefixes in preference pairs, as generated by MCTS, provide marginal but consistent improvements.
High-contrast preference pairs generally outperform low-contrast pairs; however, combining both often yields the best performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-18T15:38:39Z) - Autoformulation of Mathematical Optimization Models Using LLMs [50.030647274271516]
We develop an automated approach to creating optimization models from natural language descriptions for commercial solvers.
We identify the three core challenges of autoformulation: (1) defining the vast, problem-dependent hypothesis space, (2) efficiently searching this space under uncertainty, and (3) evaluating formulation correctness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-03T20:41:38Z) - Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness [27.43137305486112]
We propose a novel Self-supervised Preference Optimization (SPO) framework, which constructs a self-supervised preference degree loss combined with the alignment loss.
The results demonstrate that SPO can be seamlessly integrated with existing preference optimization methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-26T12:37:26Z) - ASFT: Aligned Supervised Fine-Tuning through Absolute Likelihood [14.512464277772194]
Aligned Supervised Fine-Tuning (ASFT) is an effective approach that better aligns Large Language Models with pair-wise datasets.
ASFT mitigates the issue where the DPO loss function decreases the probability of generating human-dispreferred data.
Extensive experiments demonstrate that ASFT is an effective alignment approach, consistently outperforming existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-14T11:39:13Z) - MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time [51.5039731721706]
MindStar is a purely inference-based searching method for large language models.
It formulates reasoning tasks as searching problems and proposes two search ideas to identify the optimal reasoning paths.
It significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of open-source models, such as Llama-2-13B and Mistral-7B, and achieves comparable performance to GPT-3.5 and Grok-1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-25T15:07:33Z) - Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Trees [119.57169648859707]
We introduce Eurus, a suite of large language models (LLMs) optimized for reasoning.
Eurus models achieve state-of-the-art results among open-source models on a diverse set of benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T16:25:30Z) - Mixture-of-Experts Meets Instruction Tuning:A Winning Combination for
Large Language Models [125.91897197446379]
We find that MoE models benefit more from instruction tuning than dense models.
Our most powerful model, FLAN-MOE-32B, surpasses the performance of FLAN-PALM-62B on four benchmark tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T04:22:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.