Exploring Human-AI Collaboration in Agile: Customised LLM Meeting Assistants

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14871v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:55:25 GMT
• Title: Exploring Human-AI Collaboration in Agile: Customised LLM Meeting Assistants
• Authors: Beatriz Cabrero-Daniel, Tomas Herda, Victoria Pichler, Martin Eder,
• Abstract summary: Action research study focuses on the integration of "AI assistants" in two Agile software development meetings. We discuss the critical drivers of success, and establish a link between the use of AI and team collaboration dynamics.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This action research study focuses on the integration of "AI assistants" in two Agile software development meetings: the Daily Scrum and a feature refinement, a planning meeting that is part of an in-house Scaled Agile framework. We discuss the critical drivers of success, and establish a link between the use of AI and team collaboration dynamics. We conclude with a list of lessons learnt during the interventions in an industrial context, and provide a assessment checklist for companies and teams to reflect on their readiness level. This paper is thus a road-map to facilitate the integration of AI tools in Agile setups.

Related papers

• Bridging HCI and AI Research for the Evaluation of Conversational SE Assistants [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in software engineering, recently in the form of conversational assistants. We advocate combining insights from human-computer interaction (HCI) and artificial intelligence (AI) research to enable human-centered automatic evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T21:09:24Z)
• From chalkboards to chatbots: SELAR assists teachers in embracing AI in the curriculum [41.94295877935867]
  SELAR is a framework designed to help teachers integrate artificial intelligence into their curriculum. In this paper, we assess the effectiveness of the framework through additional workshops organized with lecturers from the Hague University of Applied Sciences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T05:40:59Z)
• Using Agile Story Points and Game Theory Together: Better Software Planning and Development in Agile Software Development [0.0]
  This study integrates key concepts from Agile software development, Story Point estimation, and Game Theory. We propose the application of game theoretic strategies, notably the Vickrey Auction and Stag Hunt Game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T18:32:14Z)
• WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks? [83.19032025950986]
  We study the use of large language model-based agents for interacting with software via web browsers. WorkArena is a benchmark of 33 tasks based on the widely-used ServiceNow platform. BrowserGym is an environment for the design and evaluation of such agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T14:58:45Z)
• The Foundations of Computational Management: A Systematic Approach to Task Automation for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Existing Workflows [55.2480439325792]
  This article introduces Computational Management, a systematic approach to task automation. The article offers three easy step-by-step procedures to begin the process of implementing AI within a workflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T01:45:14Z)
• Experiential Co-Learning of Software-Developing Agents [83.34027623428096]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant changes to various domains, especially in software development. We introduce Experiential Co-Learning, a novel LLM-agent learning framework. Experiments demonstrate that the framework enables agents to tackle unseen software-developing tasks more effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T13:50:42Z)
• TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation [82.2932794189585]
  We introduce TaskBench, a framework to evaluate the capability of large language models (LLMs) in task automation. Specifically, task decomposition, tool selection, and parameter prediction are assessed. Our approach combines automated construction with rigorous human verification, ensuring high consistency with human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T18:02:44Z)
• AI for Agile development: a Meta-Analysis [0.0]
  This study explores the benefits and challenges of integrating Artificial Intelligence with Agile software development methodologies. The review helped identify critical challenges, such as the need for specialised socio-technical expertise. Further research is needed to better understand its impact on processes and practitioners, and to address the indirect challenges associated with its implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-14T08:10:40Z)
• Approach Intelligent Writing Assistants Usability with Seven Stages of Action [9.378355457555319]
  We adopt Norman's seven stages of action as a framework to approach the interaction design of intelligent writing assistants. We illustrate the framework's applicability to writing tasks by providing an example of software tutorial authoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T02:11:55Z)
• CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society [58.04479313658851]
  This paper explores the potential of building scalable techniques to facilitate autonomous cooperation among communicative agents. We propose a novel communicative agent framework named role-playing. Our contributions include introducing a novel communicative agent framework, offering a scalable approach for studying the cooperative behaviors and capabilities of multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T01:09:00Z)
• AANG: Automating Auxiliary Learning [110.36191309793135]
  We present an approach for automatically generating a suite of auxiliary objectives. We achieve this by deconstructing existing objectives within a novel unified taxonomy, identifying connections between them, and generating new ones based on the uncovered structure. This leads us to a principled and efficient algorithm for searching the space of generated objectives to find those most useful to a specified end-task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T16:32:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.