On the Design of Safe Continual RL Methods for Control of Nonlinear Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15922v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 20:34:40 GMT
• Title: On the Design of Safe Continual RL Methods for Control of Nonlinear Systems
• Authors: Austin Coursey, Marcos Quinones-Grueiro, Gautam Biswas,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning algorithms have been successfully applied to control tasks associated with unmanned aerial vehicles and robotics.<n>In recent years, safe RL has been proposed to allow the safe execution of RL algorithms in closed loops.<n>Continual adaptation on the system's safety is an understudied problem.
• Score: 2.4920094574814864
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms have been successfully applied to control tasks associated with unmanned aerial vehicles and robotics. In recent years, safe RL has been proposed to allow the safe execution of RL algorithms in industrial and mission-critical systems that operate in closed loops. However, if the system operating conditions change, such as when an unknown fault occurs in the system, typical safe RL algorithms are unable to adapt while retaining past knowledge. Continual reinforcement learning algorithms have been proposed to address this issue. However, the impact of continual adaptation on the system's safety is an understudied problem. In this paper, we study the intersection of safe and continual RL. First, we empirically demonstrate that a popular continual RL algorithm, online elastic weight consolidation, is unable to satisfy safety constraints in non-linear systems subject to varying operating conditions. Specifically, we study the MuJoCo HalfCheetah and Ant environments with velocity constraints and sudden joint loss non-stationarity. Then, we show that an agent trained using constrained policy optimization, a safe RL algorithm, experiences catastrophic forgetting in continual learning settings. With this in mind, we explore a simple reward-shaping method to ensure that elastic weight consolidation prioritizes remembering both safety and task performance for safety-constrained, non-linear, and non-stationary dynamical systems.

Related papers

• Implicit Safe Set Algorithm for Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning [7.349727826230864]
  We present a model-free safe control algorithm, the implicit safe set algorithm, for synthesizing safeguards for DRL agents. The proposed algorithm synthesizes a safety index (barrier certificate) and a subsequent safe control law solely by querying a black-box dynamic function. We validate the proposed algorithm on the state-of-the-art Safety Gym benchmark, where it achieves zero safety violations while gaining $95% pm 9%$ cumulative reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T20:59:06Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems [2.126171264016785]
  We propose Adaptive Regularization (RL-AR), an algorithm that enables safe RL exploration. RL-AR performs policy combination via a "focus module," which determines the appropriate combination depending on the state. In a series of critical control applications, we demonstrate that RL-AR not only ensures safety during training but also achieves a return competitive with the standards of model-free RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T16:35:14Z)
• Sampling-based Safe Reinforcement Learning for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems [15.863561935347692]
  We develop provably safe and convergent reinforcement learning algorithms for control of nonlinear dynamical systems. Recent advances at the intersection of control and RL follow a two-stage, safety filter approach to enforcing hard safety constraints. We develop a single-stage, sampling-based approach to hard constraint satisfaction that learns RL controllers enjoying classical convergence guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T19:39:20Z)
• Approximate Model-Based Shielding for Safe Reinforcement Learning [83.55437924143615]
  We propose a principled look-ahead shielding algorithm for verifying the performance of learned RL policies. Our algorithm differs from other shielding approaches in that it does not require prior knowledge of the safety-relevant dynamics of the system. We demonstrate superior performance to other safety-aware approaches on a set of Atari games with state-dependent safety-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T15:19:45Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Recursively Feasible Probabilistic Safe Online Learning with Control Barrier Functions [60.26921219698514]
  We introduce a model-uncertainty-aware reformulation of CBF-based safety-critical controllers. We then present the pointwise feasibility conditions of the resulting safety controller. We use these conditions to devise an event-triggered online data collection strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T05:02:09Z)
• Log Barriers for Safe Black-box Optimization with Application to Safe Reinforcement Learning [72.97229770329214]
  We introduce a general approach for seeking high dimensional non-linear optimization problems in which maintaining safety during learning is crucial. Our approach called LBSGD is based on applying a logarithmic barrier approximation with a carefully chosen step size. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on minimizing violation in policy tasks in safe reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T11:14:47Z)
• Model-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning with Time-Varying State and Control Constraints: An Application to Intelligent Vehicles [13.40143623056186]
  This paper proposes a safe RL algorithm for optimal control of nonlinear systems with time-varying state and control constraints. A multi-step policy evaluation mechanism is proposed to predict the policy's safety risk under time-varying safety constraints and guide the policy to update safely. The proposed algorithm outperforms several state-of-the-art RL algorithms in the simulated Safety Gym environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-18T10:45:31Z)
• Learning Barrier Certificates: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning with Zero Training-time Violations [64.39401322671803]
  This paper explores the possibility of safe RL algorithms with zero training-time safety violations. We propose an algorithm, Co-trained Barrier Certificate for Safe RL (CRABS), which iteratively learns barrier certificates, dynamics models, and policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T04:59:05Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Advantage-Based Intervention [45.79740561754542]
  Many sequential decision problems involve finding a policy that maximizes total reward while obeying safety constraints. We propose a new algorithm, SAILR, that uses an intervention mechanism based on advantage functions to keep the agent safe throughout training. Our method comes with strong guarantees on safety during both training and deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T20:28:56Z)
• Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Critic [72.00568333130391]
  A natural first approach toward safe RL is to manually specify constraints on the policy's behavior. We propose to learn how to be safe in one set of tasks and environments, and then use that learned intuition to constrain future behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T20:53:20Z)
• Chance-Constrained Trajectory Optimization for Safe Exploration and Learning of Nonlinear Systems [81.7983463275447]
  Learning-based control algorithms require data collection with abundant supervision for training. We present a new approach for optimal motion planning with safe exploration that integrates chance-constrained optimal control with dynamics learning and feedback control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-09T05:57:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.