Advances and Open Challenges in Federated Foundation Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15381v4
• Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 09:38:11 GMT
• Title: Advances and Open Challenges in Federated Foundation Models
• Authors: Chao Ren, Han Yu, Hongyi Peng, Xiaoli Tang, Bo Zhao, Liping Yi, Alysa Ziying Tan, Yulan Gao, Anran Li, Xiaoxiao Li, Zengxiang Li, Qiang Yang,
• Abstract summary: The integration of Foundation Models (FMs) with Federated Learning (FL) presents a transformative paradigm in Artificial Intelligence (AI) This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the emerging field of Federated Foundation Models (FedFM)
• Score: 34.37509703688661
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The integration of Foundation Models (FMs) with Federated Learning (FL) presents a transformative paradigm in Artificial Intelligence (AI). This integration offers enhanced capabilities, while addressing concerns of privacy, data decentralization and computational efficiency. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the emerging field of Federated Foundation Models (FedFM), elucidating their synergistic relationship and exploring novel methodologies, challenges, and future directions that the FL research field needs to focus on in order to thrive in the age of FMs. A systematic multi-tiered taxonomy is proposed, categorizing existing FedFM approaches for model training, aggregation, trustworthiness, and incentivization. Key challenges, including how to enable FL to deal with high complexity of computational demands, privacy considerations, contribution evaluation, and communication efficiency, are thoroughly discussed. Moreover, this paper explores the intricate challenges of communication, scalability and security inherent in training/fine-tuning FMs via FL. It highlights the potential of quantum computing to revolutionize the processes of training, inference, optimization and security. This survey also introduces the implementation requirement of FedFM and some practical FedFM applications. It highlights lessons learned with a clear understanding of our findings for FedFM. Finally, this survey not only provides insights into the current state and challenges of FedFM, but also offers a blueprint for future research directions, emphasizing the need for developing trustworthy solutions. It serves as a foundational guide for researchers and practitioners interested in contributing to this interdisciplinary and rapidly advancing field.

Related papers

• Navigating the Future of Federated Recommendation Systems with Foundation Models [27.371579064251343]
  In recent years, the integration of federated learning (FL) and recommendation systems (RS), known as Federated Recommendation Systems (FRS), has attracted attention for preserving user privacy by keeping private data on client devices. However, FRS faces inherent limitations such as data heterogeneity and scarcity, due to the privacy requirements of FL and the typical data sparsity issues of RSs. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive review of FRSs with Foundation Models (FMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T04:15:05Z)
• Open Challenges and Opportunities in Federated Foundation Models Towards Biomedical Healthcare [14.399086205317358]
  Foundation models (FMs) are trained on vast datasets through methods including unsupervised pretraining, self-supervised learning, instructed fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning from human feedback. These models are crucial for biomedical applications that require processing diverse data forms such as clinical reports, diagnostic images, and multimodal patient interactions. The incorporation of FL with these sophisticated models presents a promising strategy to harness their analytical power while safeguarding the privacy of sensitive medical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:22:24Z)
• Position Paper: Assessing Robustness, Privacy, and Fairness in Federated Learning Integrated with Foundation Models [39.86957940261993]
  Integration of Foundation Models (FMs) into Federated Learning (FL) introduces novel issues in terms of robustness, privacy, and fairness. We analyze the trade-offs involved, uncover the threats and issues introduced by this integration, and propose a set of criteria and strategies for navigating these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T19:26:00Z)
• A Survey on Efficient Federated Learning Methods for Foundation Model Training [62.473245910234304]
  Federated Learning (FL) has become an established technique to facilitate privacy-preserving collaborative training across a multitude of clients. In the wake of Foundation Models (FM), the reality is different for many deep learning applications. We discuss the benefits and drawbacks of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) for FL applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T10:22:23Z)
• A Survey of Federated Unlearning: A Taxonomy, Challenges and Future Directions [71.16718184611673]
  The evolution of privacy-preserving Federated Learning (FL) has led to an increasing demand for implementing the right to be forgotten. The implementation of selective forgetting is particularly challenging in FL due to its decentralized nature. Federated Unlearning (FU) emerges as a strategic solution to address the increasing need for data privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T01:34:33Z)
• The Role of Federated Learning in a Wireless World with Foundation Models [59.8129893837421]
  Foundation models (FMs) are general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) models that have recently enabled multiple brand-new generative AI applications. Currently, the exploration of the interplay between FMs and federated learning (FL) is still in its nascent stage. This article explores the extent to which FMs are suitable for FL over wireless networks, including a broad overview of research challenges and opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T04:13:10Z)
• When Foundation Model Meets Federated Learning: Motivations, Challenges, and Future Directions [47.00147534252281]
  The intersection of the Foundation Model (FM) and Federated Learning (FL) provides mutual benefits. FL expands the availability of data for FMs and enables computation sharing, distributing the training process and reducing the burden on FL participants. On the other hand, FM, with its enormous size, pre-trained knowledge, and exceptional performance, serves as a robust starting point for FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T15:15:55Z)
• Deep Equilibrium Models Meet Federated Learning [71.57324258813675]
  This study explores the problem of Federated Learning (FL) by utilizing the Deep Equilibrium (DEQ) models instead of conventional deep learning networks. We claim that incorporating DEQ models into the federated learning framework naturally addresses several open problems in FL. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to establish a connection between DEQ models and federated learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T22:51:40Z)
• Towards Verifiable Federated Learning [15.758657927386263]
  Federated learning (FL) is an emerging paradigm of collaborative machine learning that preserves user privacy while building powerful models. Due to the nature of open participation by self-interested entities, FL needs to guard against potential misbehaviours by legitimate FL participants. Verifiable federated learning has become an emerging topic of research that has attracted significant interest from the academia and the industry alike.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T09:52:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.