Position Paper: Assessing Robustness, Privacy, and Fairness in Federated
Learning Integrated with Foundation Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01857v1
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 19:26:00 GMT
- Title: Position Paper: Assessing Robustness, Privacy, and Fairness in Federated
Learning Integrated with Foundation Models
- Authors: Xi Li, Jiaqi Wang
- Abstract summary: Integration of Foundation Models (FMs) into Federated Learning (FL) introduces novel issues in terms of robustness, privacy, and fairness.
We analyze the trade-offs involved, uncover the threats and issues introduced by this integration, and propose a set of criteria and strategies for navigating these challenges.
- Score: 39.86957940261993
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Federated Learning (FL), while a breakthrough in decentralized machine
learning, contends with significant challenges such as limited data
availability and the variability of computational resources, which can stifle
the performance and scalability of the models. The integration of Foundation
Models (FMs) into FL presents a compelling solution to these issues, with the
potential to enhance data richness and reduce computational demands through
pre-training and data augmentation. However, this incorporation introduces
novel issues in terms of robustness, privacy, and fairness, which have not been
sufficiently addressed in the existing research. We make a preliminary
investigation into this field by systematically evaluating the implications of
FM-FL integration across these dimensions. We analyze the trade-offs involved,
uncover the threats and issues introduced by this integration, and propose a
set of criteria and strategies for navigating these challenges. Furthermore, we
identify potential research directions for advancing this field, laying a
foundation for future development in creating reliable, secure, and equitable
FL systems.
Related papers
- Privacy in Federated Learning [0.0]
Federated Learning (FL) represents a significant advancement in distributed machine learning.
This chapter delves into the core privacy concerns within FL, including the risks of data reconstruction, model inversion attacks, and membership inference.
It examines the trade-offs between model accuracy and privacy, emphasizing the importance of balancing these factors in practical implementations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-12T18:41:58Z) - Advances and Open Challenges in Federated Foundation Models [34.37509703688661]
The integration of Foundation Models (FMs) with Federated Learning (FL) presents a transformative paradigm in Artificial Intelligence (AI)
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the emerging field of Federated Foundation Models (FedFM)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-23T09:44:58Z) - A Comprehensive Study on Model Initialization Techniques Ensuring
Efficient Federated Learning [0.0]
Federated learning(FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training machine learning models in a distributed and privacy-preserving manner.
The choice of methods used for models plays a crucial role in the performance, convergence speed, communication efficiency, privacy guarantees of federated learning systems.
Our research meticulously compares, categorizes, and delineates the merits and demerits of each technique, examining their applicability across diverse FL scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T23:26:58Z) - Privacy-preserving Federated Primal-dual Learning for Non-convex and Non-smooth Problems with Model Sparsification [51.04894019092156]
Federated learning (FL) has been recognized as a rapidly growing area, where the model is trained over clients under the FL orchestration (PS)
In this paper, we propose a novel primal sparification algorithm for and guarantee non-smooth FL problems.
Its unique insightful properties and its analyses are also presented.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T14:15:47Z) - A Survey of Federated Unlearning: A Taxonomy, Challenges and Future
Directions [71.16718184611673]
The evolution of privacy-preserving Federated Learning (FL) has led to an increasing demand for implementing the right to be forgotten.
The implementation of selective forgetting is particularly challenging in FL due to its decentralized nature.
Federated Unlearning (FU) emerges as a strategic solution to address the increasing need for data privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T01:34:33Z) - When Foundation Model Meets Federated Learning: Motivations, Challenges,
and Future Directions [47.00147534252281]
The intersection of the Foundation Model (FM) and Federated Learning (FL) provides mutual benefits.
FL expands the availability of data for FMs and enables computation sharing, distributing the training process and reducing the burden on FL participants.
On the other hand, FM, with its enormous size, pre-trained knowledge, and exceptional performance, serves as a robust starting point for FL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-27T15:15:55Z) - Deep Equilibrium Models Meet Federated Learning [71.57324258813675]
This study explores the problem of Federated Learning (FL) by utilizing the Deep Equilibrium (DEQ) models instead of conventional deep learning networks.
We claim that incorporating DEQ models into the federated learning framework naturally addresses several open problems in FL.
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to establish a connection between DEQ models and federated learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T22:51:40Z) - Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution
Shifts [49.58991359544005]
PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method.
We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.