Cybersecurity Pathways Towards CE-Certified Autonomous Forestry Machines

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19643v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:44:57 GMT
• Title: Cybersecurity Pathways Towards CE-Certified Autonomous Forestry Machines
• Authors: Mazen Mohamad, Ramana Reddy Avula, Peter Folkesson, Pierre Kleberger, Aria Mirzai, Martin Skoglund, Marvin Damschen,
• Abstract summary: We identify challenges towards CE-certified autonomous forestry machines focusing on cybersecurity and safety. We discuss the relationship between safety and cybersecurity risk assessment and their relation to AI.
• Score: 0.1396038187727205
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The increased importance of cybersecurity in autonomous machinery is becoming evident in the forestry domain. Forestry worksites are becoming more complex with the involvement of multiple systems and system of systems. Hence, there is a need to investigate how to address cybersecurity challenges for autonomous systems of systems in the forestry domain. Using a literature review and adapting standards from similar domains, as well as collaborative sessions with domain experts, we identify challenges towards CE-certified autonomous forestry machines focusing on cybersecurity and safety. Furthermore, we discuss the relationship between safety and cybersecurity risk assessment and their relation to AI, highlighting the need for a holistic methodology for their assurance.

Related papers

• Generative AI Agents in Autonomous Machines: A Safety Perspective [9.02400798202199]
  generative AI agents provide unparalleled capabilities, but they also have unique safety concerns. This work investigates the evolving safety requirements when generative models are integrated as agents into physical autonomous machines. We recommend the development and implementation of comprehensive safety scorecards for the use of generative AI technologies in autonomous machines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T20:07:08Z)
• AI Risk Management Should Incorporate Both Safety and Security [185.68738503122114]
  We argue that stakeholders in AI risk management should be aware of the nuances, synergies, and interplay between safety and security. We introduce a unified reference framework to clarify the differences and interplay between AI safety and AI security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T21:00:47Z)
• Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
  We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Security Challenges in Autonomous Systems Design [1.864621482724548]
  With the independence from human control, cybersecurity of such systems becomes even more critical. With the independence from human control, cybersecurity of such systems becomes even more critical. This paper thoroughly discusses the state of the art, identifies emerging security challenges and proposes research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-05T09:17:39Z)
• Future Vision of Dynamic Certification Schemes for Autonomous Systems [3.151005833357807]
  We identify several issues with the current certification strategies that could pose serious safety risks. We highlight the inadequate reflection of software changes in constantly evolving systems and the lack of support for systems' cooperation. Other shortcomings include the narrow focus of awarded certification, neglecting aspects such as the ethical behavior of autonomous software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T19:06:57Z)
• Leveraging Traceability to Integrate Safety Analysis Artifacts into the Software Development Process [51.42800587382228]
  Safety assurance cases (SACs) can be challenging to maintain during system evolution. We propose a solution that leverages software traceability to connect relevant system artifacts to safety analysis models. We elicit design rationales for system changes to help safety stakeholders analyze the impact of system changes on safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T16:03:27Z)
• Rethinking Certification for Higher Trust and Ethical Safeguarding of Autonomous Systems [6.24907186790431]
  We discuss the motivation for the need to modify the current certification processes for autonomous driving systems. We identify a number of issues with the proposed certification strategies, which may impact the systems substantially.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T15:19:25Z)
• System Safety and Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  New applications of AI across societal domains come with new hazards. The field of system safety has dealt with accidents and harm in safety-critical systems. This chapter honors system safety pioneer Nancy Leveson.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T16:37:54Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)
• Trustworthy AI Inference Systems: An Industry Research View [58.000323504158054]
  We provide an industry research view for approaching the design, deployment, and operation of trustworthy AI inference systems. We highlight opportunities and challenges in AI systems using trusted execution environments. We outline areas of further development that require the global collective attention of industry, academia, and government researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T23:05:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.