BiomedRAG: A Retrieval Augmented Large Language Model for Biomedicine

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00465v3
• Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 01:12:08 GMT
• Title: BiomedRAG: A Retrieval Augmented Large Language Model for Biomedicine
• Authors: Mingchen Li, Halil Kilicoglu, Hua Xu, Rui Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have swiftly emerged as vital resources for different applications in the biomedical and healthcare domains. textscBiomedRAG attains superior performance across 5 biomedical NLP tasks. textscBiomedRAG outperforms other triple extraction systems with micro-F1 scores of 81.42 and 88.83 on GIT and ChemProt corpora, respectively.
• Score: 19.861178160437827
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have swiftly emerged as vital resources for different applications in the biomedical and healthcare domains; however, these models encounter issues such as generating inaccurate information or hallucinations. Retrieval-augmented generation provided a solution for these models to update knowledge and enhance their performance. In contrast to previous retrieval-augmented LMs, which utilize specialized cross-attention mechanisms to help LLM encode retrieved text, BiomedRAG adopts a simpler approach by directly inputting the retrieved chunk-based documents into the LLM. This straightforward design is easily applicable to existing retrieval and language models, effectively bypassing noise information in retrieved documents, particularly in noise-intensive tasks. Moreover, we demonstrate the potential for utilizing the LLM to supervise the retrieval model in the biomedical domain, enabling it to retrieve the document that assists the LM in improving its predictions. Our experiments reveal that with the tuned scorer,\textsc{ BiomedRAG} attains superior performance across 5 biomedical NLP tasks, encompassing information extraction (triple extraction, relation extraction), text classification, link prediction, and question-answering, leveraging over 9 datasets. For instance, in the triple extraction task, \textsc{BiomedRAG} outperforms other triple extraction systems with micro-F1 scores of 81.42 and 88.83 on GIT and ChemProt corpora, respectively.

Related papers

• NeuroSym-BioCAT: Leveraging Neuro-Symbolic Methods for Biomedical Scholarly Document Categorization and Question Answering [0.14999444543328289]
  We introduce a novel approach that integrates an optimized topic modelling framework, OVB-LDA, with the BI-POP CMA-ES optimization technique for enhanced scholarly document abstract categorization. We employ the distilled MiniLM model, fine-tuned on domain-specific data, for high-precision answer extraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T14:45:12Z)
• Explainable Biomedical Hypothesis Generation via Retrieval Augmented Generation enabled Large Language Models [46.05020842978823]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools to navigate this complex data landscape. RAGGED is a comprehensive workflow designed to support investigators with knowledge integration and hypothesis generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T07:44:18Z)
• SeRTS: Self-Rewarding Tree Search for Biomedical Retrieval-Augmented Generation [50.26966969163348]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in the biomedical domain with the advancement of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) Existing retrieval-augmented approaches face challenges in addressing diverse queries and documents, particularly for medical knowledge queries. We propose Self-Rewarding Tree Search (SeRTS) based on Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and a self-rewarding paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T06:48:31Z)
• SciRIFF: A Resource to Enhance Language Model Instruction-Following over Scientific Literature [80.49349719239584]
  We present SciRIFF (Scientific Resource for Instruction-Following and Finetuning), a dataset of 137K instruction-following demonstrations for 54 tasks. SciRIFF is the first dataset focused on extracting and synthesizing information from research literature across a wide range of scientific fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T21:22:08Z)
• An Evaluation of Large Language Models in Bioinformatics Research [52.100233156012756]
  We study the performance of large language models (LLMs) on a wide spectrum of crucial bioinformatics tasks. These tasks include the identification of potential coding regions, extraction of named entities for genes and proteins, detection of antimicrobial and anti-cancer peptides, molecular optimization, and resolution of educational bioinformatics problems. Our findings indicate that, given appropriate prompts, LLMs like GPT variants can successfully handle most of these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T11:27:31Z)
• Graph-Based Retriever Captures the Long Tail of Biomedical Knowledge [2.2814097119704058]
  Large language models (LLMs) are transforming the way information is retrieved with vast amounts of knowledge being summarized and presented. LLMs are prone to highlight the most frequently seen pieces of information from the training set and to neglect the rare ones. We introduce a novel information-retrieval method that leverages a knowledge graph to downsample these clusters and mitigate the information overload problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T18:31:11Z)
• Improving Medical Reasoning through Retrieval and Self-Reflection with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [18.984165679347026]
  Self-BioRAG is a framework reliable for biomedical text that specializes in generating explanations, retrieving domain-specific documents, and self-reflecting generated responses. We utilize 84k filtered biomedical instruction sets to train Self-BioRAG that can assess its generated explanations with customized reflective tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-27T02:29:42Z)
• UMLS-KGI-BERT: Data-Centric Knowledge Integration in Transformers for Biomedical Entity Recognition [4.865221751784403]
  This work contributes a data-centric paradigm for enriching the language representations of biomedical transformer-encoder LMs by extracting text sequences from the UMLS. Preliminary results from experiments in the extension of pre-trained LMs as well as training from scratch show that this framework improves downstream performance on multiple biomedical and clinical Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T18:08:34Z)
• Interpretable Medical Diagnostics with Structured Data Extraction by Large Language Models [59.89454513692417]
  Tabular data is often hidden in text, particularly in medical diagnostic reports. We propose a novel, simple, and effective methodology for extracting structured tabular data from textual medical reports, called TEMED-LLM. We demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art text classification models in medical diagnostics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T09:12:28Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)
• Scientific Language Models for Biomedical Knowledge Base Completion: An Empirical Study [62.376800537374024]
  We study scientific LMs for KG completion, exploring whether we can tap into their latent knowledge to enhance biomedical link prediction. We integrate the LM-based models with KG embedding models, using a router method that learns to assign each input example to either type of model and provides a substantial boost in performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T17:55:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.