Towards Adapting Open-Source Large Language Models for Expert-Level Clinical Note Generation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00715v6
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 14:58:40 GMT
- Title: Towards Adapting Open-Source Large Language Models for Expert-Level Clinical Note Generation
- Authors: Hanyin Wang, Chufan Gao, Bolun Liu, Qiping Xu, Guleid Hussein, Mohamad El Labban, Kingsley Iheasirim, Hariprasad Korsapati, Chuck Outcalt, Jimeng Sun,
- Abstract summary: This study presents a comprehensive domain- and task-specific adaptation process for the open-source LLaMA-2 13 billion parameter model.<n>Our process incorporates continued pretraining, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning from both AI and human feedback.<n>Our resulting model, LLaMA-Clinic, can generate clinical notes comparable in quality to those authored by physicians.
- Score: 19.08691249610632
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Proprietary Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 and Gemini have demonstrated promising capabilities in clinical text summarization tasks. However, due to patient data privacy concerns and computational costs, many healthcare providers prefer using small, locally-hosted models over external generic LLMs. This study presents a comprehensive domain- and task-specific adaptation process for the open-source LLaMA-2 13 billion parameter model, enabling it to generate high-quality clinical notes from outpatient patient-doctor dialogues. Our process incorporates continued pretraining, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning from both AI and human feedback. We introduced a new approach, DistillDirect, for performing on-policy reinforcement learning with Gemini 1.0 Pro as the teacher model. Our resulting model, LLaMA-Clinic, can generate clinical notes comparable in quality to those authored by physicians. In a blinded physician reader study, the majority (92.8%) of individual evaluations rated the notes generated by LLaMA-Clinic as "acceptable" or higher across three criteria: real-world readiness, completeness, and accuracy. In the more challenging "Assessment and Plan" section, LLaMA-Clinic matched physician-authored notes in real-world readiness score. We highlight key considerations for future clinical note-generation tasks, emphasizing the importance of pre-defining a "best practice" note format, rather than relying on LLMs to determine this for clinical practice.
Related papers
- Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions.<n>We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning.<n>Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z) - LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.
We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.
Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z) - A Comparative Study of Recent Large Language Models on Generating Hospital Discharge Summaries for Lung Cancer Patients [19.777109737517996]
This research aims to explore how large language models (LLMs) can alleviate the burden of manual summarization.
This study evaluates the performance of multiple LLMs, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-4o, and LLaMA 3 8b, in generating discharge summaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T10:02:50Z) - Demystifying Large Language Models for Medicine: A Primer [50.83806796466396]
Large language models (LLMs) represent a transformative class of AI tools capable of revolutionizing various aspects of healthcare.
This tutorial aims to equip healthcare professionals with the tools necessary to effectively integrate LLMs into clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T15:41:56Z) - Large Language Models for Medical OSCE Assessment: A Novel Approach to Transcript Analysis [0.0]
We analyzed 2,027 video-recorded OSCE examinations from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW)
We studied the performance of various LLM-based approaches for grading students on this summarization task based on their examination transcripts.
Our results show that frontier LLM models like GPT-4 achieved remarkable alignment with human graders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T19:16:03Z) - Improving Clinical Note Generation from Complex Doctor-Patient Conversation [20.2157016701399]
We present three key contributions to the field of clinical note generation using large language models (LLMs)<n>First, we introduce CliniKnote, a dataset consisting of 1,200 complex doctor-patient conversations paired with their full clinical notes.<n>Second, we propose K-SOAP, which enhances traditional SOAPcitepodder20soap (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) notes by adding a keyword section at the top, allowing for quick identification of essential information.<n>Third, we develop an automatic pipeline to generate K-SOAP notes from doctor-patient conversations and benchmark various modern LLMs using various
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-26T18:39:31Z) - Towards Evaluating and Building Versatile Large Language Models for Medicine [57.49547766838095]
We present MedS-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in clinical contexts.
MedS-Bench spans 11 high-level clinical tasks, including clinical report summarization, treatment recommendations, diagnosis, named entity recognition, and medical concept explanation.
MedS-Ins comprises 58 medically oriented language corpora, totaling 13.5 million samples across 122 tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T17:01:34Z) - Large Language Models in the Clinic: A Comprehensive Benchmark [63.21278434331952]
We build a benchmark ClinicBench to better understand large language models (LLMs) in the clinic.
We first collect eleven existing datasets covering diverse clinical language generation, understanding, and reasoning tasks.
We then construct six novel datasets and clinical tasks that are complex but common in real-world practice.
We conduct an extensive evaluation of twenty-two LLMs under both zero-shot and few-shot settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-25T15:51:06Z) - A Dataset and Benchmark for Hospital Course Summarization with Adapted Large Language Models [4.091402760759184]
Large language models (LLMs) depict remarkable capabilities in automating real-world tasks, but their capabilities for healthcare applications have not been shown.
We introduce a novel pre-processed dataset, the MIMIC-IV-BHC, encapsulating clinical note and brief hospital course (BHC) pairs to adapt LLMs for BHC.
Using clinical notes as input, we apply prompting-based (using in-context learning) and fine-tuning-based adaptation strategies to three open-source LLMs and two proprietary LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T23:17:55Z) - SoftTiger: A Clinical Foundation Model for Healthcare Workflows [5.181665205189493]
We introduce SoftTiger, a clinical large language model (CLaM) designed as a foundation model for healthcare.
We collect and annotate data for three subtasks, namely, international patient summary, clinical impression and medical encounter.
We supervised fine-tuned a state-of-the-art LLM using public and credentialed clinical data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-01T04:39:16Z) - Large Language Model Distilling Medication Recommendation Model [61.89754499292561]
We harness the powerful semantic comprehension and input-agnostic characteristics of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our research aims to transform existing medication recommendation methodologies using LLMs.
To mitigate this, we have developed a feature-level knowledge distillation technique, which transfers the LLM's proficiency to a more compact model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T08:25:22Z) - Natural Language Programming in Medicine: Administering Evidence Based Clinical Workflows with Autonomous Agents Powered by Generative Large Language Models [29.05425041393475]
Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) hold significant promise in healthcare.
This study assessed the potential of LLMs to function as autonomous agents in a simulated tertiary care medical center.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-05T15:09:57Z) - Distilling Large Language Models for Matching Patients to Clinical
Trials [3.4068841624198942]
The recent success of large language models (LLMs) has paved the way for their adoption in the high-stakes domain of healthcare.
This study presents the first systematic examination of the efficacy of both proprietary (GPT-3.5, and GPT-4) and open-source LLMs (LLAMA 7B,13B, and 70B) for the task of patient-trial matching.
Our findings reveal that open-source LLMs, when fine-tuned on this limited and synthetic dataset, demonstrate performance parity with their proprietary counterparts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T17:11:07Z) - Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarization [8.456700096020601]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in natural language processing (NLP), but their effectiveness on a diverse range of clinical summarization tasks remains unproven.
In this study, we apply adaptation methods to eight LLMs, spanning four distinct clinical summarization tasks.
A clinical reader study with ten physicians evaluates summary, completeness, correctness, and conciseness; in a majority of cases, summaries from our best adapted LLMs are either equivalent (45%) or superior (36%) compared to summaries from medical experts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-14T05:15:01Z) - Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on
Patient-Trial Matching [49.78442796596806]
We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM)
Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T03:14:00Z) - Retrieval-Augmented and Knowledge-Grounded Language Models for Faithful Clinical Medicine [68.7814360102644]
We propose the Re$3$Writer method with retrieval-augmented generation and knowledge-grounded reasoning.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in generating patient discharge instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-23T16:34:39Z) - Human Evaluation and Correlation with Automatic Metrics in Consultation
Note Generation [56.25869366777579]
In recent years, machine learning models have rapidly become better at generating clinical consultation notes.
We present an extensive human evaluation study where 5 clinicians listen to 57 mock consultations, write their own notes, post-edit a number of automatically generated notes, and extract all the errors.
We find that a simple, character-based Levenshtein distance metric performs on par if not better than common model-based metrics like BertScore.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-01T14:04:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.