Marginal Causal Flows for Validation and Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01295v1
• Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 16:04:57 GMT
• Title: Marginal Causal Flows for Validation and Inference
• Authors: Daniel de Vassimon Manela, Laura Battaglia, Robin J. Evans,
• Abstract summary: Investigating the marginal causal effect of an intervention on an outcome from complex data remains challenging. We introduce Frugal Flows, a novel likelihood-based machine learning model that uses normalising flows to flexibly learn the data-generating process. We demonstrate the above with experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets.
• Score: 3.547529079746247
• License:
• Abstract: Investigating the marginal causal effect of an intervention on an outcome from complex data remains challenging due to the inflexibility of employed models and the lack of complexity in causal benchmark datasets, which often fail to reproduce intricate real-world data patterns. In this paper we introduce Frugal Flows, a novel likelihood-based machine learning model that uses normalising flows to flexibly learn the data-generating process, while also directly inferring the marginal causal quantities from observational data. We propose that these models are exceptionally well suited for generating synthetic data to validate causal methods. They can create synthetic datasets that closely resemble the empirical dataset, while automatically and exactly satisfying a user-defined average treatment effect. To our knowledge, Frugal Flows are the first generative model to both learn flexible data representations and also exactly parameterise quantities such as the average treatment effect and the degree of unobserved confounding. We demonstrate the above with experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets.

Related papers

• Synthetic Simplicity: Unveiling Bias in Medical Data Augmentation [0.7499722271664144]
  Synthetic data is becoming increasingly integral in data-scarce fields such as medical imaging. downstream neural networks often exploit spurious distinctions between real and synthetic data when there is a strong correlation between the data source and the task label. This exploitation manifests as textitsimplicity bias, where models overly rely on superficial features rather than genuine task-related complexities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T15:14:17Z)
• Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models [89.88010750772413]
  Synthetic data has been proposed as a solution to address the issue of high-quality data scarcity in the training of large language models (LLMs) Our work delves into these specific flaws associated with question-answer (Q-A) pairs, a prevalent type of synthetic data, and presents a method based on unlearning techniques to mitigate these flaws. Our work has yielded key insights into the effective use of synthetic data, aiming to promote more robust and efficient LLM training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T08:38:59Z)
• Mind the Gap Between Synthetic and Real: Utilizing Transfer Learning to Probe the Boundaries of Stable Diffusion Generated Data [2.6016285265085526]
  Student models show a significant drop in accuracy compared to models trained on real data. By training these layers using either real or synthetic data, we reveal that the drop mainly stems from the model's final layers. Our results suggest an improved trade-off between the amount of real training data used and the model's accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T07:51:13Z)
• Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models [56.84592466204185]
  This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop. We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models. We present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T02:08:09Z)
• Fake It Till Make It: Federated Learning with Consensus-Oriented Generation [52.82176415223988]
  We propose federated learning with consensus-oriented generation (FedCOG) FedCOG consists of two key components at the client side: complementary data generation and knowledge-distillation-based model training. Experiments on classical and real-world FL datasets show that FedCOG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T18:49:59Z)
• On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Data [56.153542044045224]
  We study the impact of training generative models on mixed datasets. We first prove the stability of iterative training under the condition that the initial generative models approximate the data distribution well enough. We empirically validate our theory on both synthetic and natural images by iteratively training normalizing flows and state-of-the-art diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T16:41:04Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• Causal-TGAN: Generating Tabular Data Using Causal Generative Adversarial Networks [7.232789848964222]
  We propose a causal model named Causal Tabular Generative Neural Network (Causal-TGAN) to generate synthetic data. Experiments on both simulated datasets and real datasets demonstrate the better performance of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-21T17:59:41Z)
• Training Deep Normalizing Flow Models in Highly Incomplete Data Scenarios with Prior Regularization [13.985534521589257]
  We propose a novel framework to facilitate the learning of data distributions in high paucity scenarios. The proposed framework naturally stems from posing the process of learning from incomplete data as a joint optimization task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-03T20:57:57Z)
• Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders. We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.